Page 1 of 7 [ 111 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

benjimanbreeg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,515

06 Mar 2008, 2:30 pm

No offence to that new guy who just posted asking what it meant. Its been annoying me for a while now. We're all human beings, just different. Getting upset with people cause they're "normal" won't get you anywhere.



Lightning88
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Aug 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,890

06 Mar 2008, 3:00 pm

Thank you!! ! This has been totally annoying to me as well.



howzat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Aug 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,802
Location: Hornsey North London

06 Mar 2008, 3:08 pm

I never used dat word NT until i came across dis site but yeah i agree it is very annoyin n at da end of da day we r all human beings.



Social_Fantom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,907
Location: Trapped outside of the space time continuum

06 Mar 2008, 3:14 pm

I just said this in my last post, there is no such thing as a "normal" person. Therefore NT's are not normal either, they vary by the individual just like we do.


_________________
So simple, it's complicated


benjimanbreeg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,515

06 Mar 2008, 3:26 pm

Exactly, thanks. I've lived around people without AS and lived like I haven't got it most of my life. It pisses me off when people on this site talk about"nt's" like there some sort of monsters! :roll:



MissConstrue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,052
Location: MO

06 Mar 2008, 3:26 pm

I didn't know what it meant either but never asked. Now that I do, I use it in terms of those who don't have autism or aspergers. I really don't believe in normal.



IsThatAFact
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 86
Location: Australia

06 Mar 2008, 4:12 pm

Quote:
there is no such thing as a "normal" person


Of course there is a ‘normal’ if you like it’s the ‘average’ – normal is a measurement of central tendency (it is a range not a point) – simplistically it is the area where most of the measurement are, from there variations trend in both directions. Height is the easiest to imagine, if you measure 1000 people, typically most will be towards the centre, that is ‘normal’, less and less will occur towards the extremities (there are fewer really tall or really short people).

Hence NT is a term describing the people that are close to the middle of the measurement (of what is another question), AS people will be to one side of this normal range (and will also cover a range). Therefore, in my opinion there is nothing wrong with the term NT as a descriptive label, but, some people misuse it just like other labels (e.g., race and religon).



Joeker
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 9 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 361
Location: The Interwebs

06 Mar 2008, 4:13 pm

I never really saw what the point was. I guess it's just a label to affix. Mostly, it's not a good label, though, normally just one for angry people to attribute their problems to.

I happen to like them, myself. Some of them are even pretty cute. :wink:


_________________
1234
FOUR
Four is the only number which is itself has the same number of letters as it itself is.


benjimanbreeg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,515

06 Mar 2008, 4:16 pm

IsThatAFact wrote:
Quote:
there is no such thing as a "normal" person


Of course there is a ‘normal’ if you like it’s the ‘average’ – normal is a measurement of central tendency (it is a range not a point) – simplistically it is the area where most of the measurement are, from there variations trend in both directions. Height is the easiest to imagine, if you measure 1000 people, typically most will be towards the centre, that is ‘normal’, less and less will occur towards the extremities (there are fewer really tall or really short people).

Hence NT is a term describing the people that are close to the middle of the measurement (of what is another question), AS people will be to one side of this normal range (and will also cover a range). Therefore, in my opinion there is nothing wrong with the term NT as a descriptive label, but, some people misuse it just like other labels (e.g., race and religon).


how about just using their names?



Syd
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Dec 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,280

06 Mar 2008, 4:17 pm

I used to think that way, until I attended my first NT hunt with some experienced ASers. There's nothing like catching and mounting your first yuppie.



sarahstilettos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Sep 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 847

06 Mar 2008, 4:21 pm

It should just be a useful term to describe people who aren't autistic. Here, it seems to be short for 'those evil people'. Weird stuff.



benjimanbreeg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,515

06 Mar 2008, 4:26 pm

sarahstilettos wrote:
It should just be a useful term to describe people who aren't autistic. Here, it seems to be short for 'those evil people'. Weird stuff.


thats what i'm talking about. Its really silly!



richardbenson
Xfractor Card #351
Xfractor Card #351

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,553
Location: Leave only a footprint behind

06 Mar 2008, 5:19 pm

i agree with benji. i only use the word NT to piss off aspies i dont like by calling them NT. its very effective and quite mahvoulus :lol:


_________________
Winds of clarity. a universal understanding come and go, I've seen though the Darkness to understand the bounty of Light


angelgirl1224
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 537
Location: england

06 Mar 2008, 5:22 pm

agreed, i dont realy like using it eather!



SQ
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 5 Mar 2008
Age: 73
Gender: Female
Posts: 5
Location: Arizona

06 Mar 2008, 8:43 pm

benjimanbreeg wrote:
No offence to that new guy who just posted asking what it meant. Its been annoying me for a while now. We're all human beings, just different. Getting upset with people cause they're "normal" won't get you anywhere.


Hi, I'm SQ :tongue: I'm here because I've been doing some thinking about myself and believe there is a possibility I have AS. Would someone point me in the direction of a forum where someone might be willing to discuss this with me?

BTW - what is NT? I can't find the post by the new guy that was referred to here; so I can't find the answer. It appears that it's an negative (?) term for non-AS/Autism people? I hope not; if my thoughts are wrong, you'll all hate me. :(



Lightning88
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Aug 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,890

06 Mar 2008, 8:57 pm

SQ wrote:
BTW - what is NT? I can't find the post by the new guy that was referred to here; so I can't find the answer. It appears that it's an negative (?) term for non-AS/Autism people? I hope not; if my thoughts are wrong, you'll all hate me. :(

Actually, you're dead on with your answer. That's exactly what it means. And yeah, it's a pretty negative term, too, unfortunately.