9CatMom wrote:
I thought the book was very interesting. Although I can't relate to all of it, not being a synesthete, I found his descriptions interesting. Like Daniel Tammet, I credit my parents for most of my success.
I don't think my kids will credit their success to me--honstly, I'd rather they didn't. Their success is theirs alone. I'm merely a facilitator. It's all in the genes, good modeling--mostly genes, I think.
Honestly, that burden is too big for me--I don't want it. We enter the world alone and exit alone--what we do with ourselves is our personal map.
Parents, too often, are the blame for kids woes or success. I don't think it's fair, so I quit. (too old for that I suppose)--okay, I'm done. I used to enjoy quitting when things weren't going my way. I miss that.
Too much posting tonight. 437 posts so far...
I will pick up D. Tammet's book--haven't read it yet--am interested. I've never had such a fondness for numbers and disliked math. My son, too, is not so great with math but loves the sciences. I did like to count words on my hands and liked to reduce a sentence to five words (not sure why)--one word for each hand. I'm a reductionist I guess.
Nevertheless, the idea of associating numbers with colors and textures is intriguing. One of my characters (pretty much feral and nonverbal--autism in the 60's) does something somewhat similar so this would be helpful. According to my research, I discovered that autistic-savants are gifted in numbers. Makes sense. My son thinks of dots rather than the numbers when he's performing basic computations (so he tells me).
equinn