Roddanagh wrote:
Blech. I'm sort of bad at this stuff. Used to get lost in my highschool all four years I went there.
Buut.. this coincides pretty well with the
spatial IQ I was assigned by professional tests - 110.
It's just that, uh. That's only one part of the test.
So if you're either particularly good or particularly bad at spatial concepts, it won't be truly representative.
I scored 102.... not much different than my PIQ scores on the five WAIS tests i've taken in my life (82-94-100-102-111).
I've taken this test before and received the same score. I've taken the actual Raven's on one WAIS and scored 50%.
I also scored superior, average and low average on the "Matrix Reasoning" (modeled on Raven's) section I had on three of my WAIS tests.
All of my neuropsych evals suggest that I exhibit *classic* NVLD characteristics.... so my results here really aren't shocking
I'm sure there's enough people with *classic* NVLD profiles who perform well on Raven's-type tests.
My own particular nonverbal reasoning is pretty much non-existent though.
I read that Spearman considered Raven's to be the best measure of G. Assuming he was correct and that there's any legitimacy to G in the first place, then my own "general intelligence" would be perfectly mediocre.
*sighs*...no further comment.