"You can tell alot by looking into her eyes"...umm

Page 1 of 2 [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

johnnydangerous
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jul 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 157

01 Apr 2011, 8:55 am

Anyone else never quite "get this" whole concept? I hear people say all the time "man just look into her eyes and you'll know!!"

I've been on dates where her eyes looked pretty damn loving to me, but when I call for date 2 I get the "we didnt have a connection" speech. So obviously my EYE READING must really suck?!?!

"Eyes windows to the soul" what the F does that even mean? When I stare at a womans eyes I cant tell if she likes me, hates me, or is indifferent!! All looks the same to me...just...eyes!!

You know what I think? If a guy goes on a date, and it happens to work out, he says later "I knew when I looked in her eyes, she was the one!!"...only he fails to mention he said that about the previous 50 OTHER WOMEN AS WELL, and was wrong about it!! It just sounds nice AFTER to say "it was all in her eyes". Cmon.

Am I alone on this? Am I just incredibly bad at noticing things like that?



Callista
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,775
Location: Ohio, USA

01 Apr 2011, 9:07 am

"Reading someone's eyes" is actually short for reading their entire face, not just their eye movements. NTs are wired to do this very efficiently and use it for a great deal of their communication. So when an NT "looks into another person's eyes" (i.e., looks at and analyzes that person's face), they can get a lot of information from that person.

On the other hand, autistic people are better off communicating in words, much of the time--there are exceptions; there are some autistics around here who say they can dump the words and use face-reading just fine, especially with other autistics--but in general, words are best. If you are feeling something, say it in words. Ask what the other person is feeling--for example, you may simply ask, "What are you thinking about?" (Just asking "how are you" will produce the form response; just use that question for protocol--it's useless for getting information about what someone's feeling.)

I think you will probably do better if you just use the date to find out as much about her as you possibly can--what she likes to do, what her life is like, what she thinks is fun or annoying. Just try to find out if you have things in common, things you can do together that are fun. Establish a connection based on facts and common interests, if you can. I would find it awfully hard to connect with a total stranger on the first date (or even an acquaintance); but then, I'm asexual and my primary need for connection is intellectual and non-physical.

Far as I can tell, that first date is mostly for figuring out whether you have potential as a couple, and whether you want to give it a shot. So just try to learn from her who she is. Get a lot of information. And if you want to invite her to a second date, try something fun that you know she likes and that you also like. Dates don't have to be all about staring into each other's eyes. Having fun together is just as good, and takes the pressure off your weaker social skills. Or maybe you will find out that you have not found a potential romantic interest, but you have found a friend you like to spend time with. That's good too.


_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com

Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com


hill-o-beans
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 16 Mar 2011
Age: 114
Gender: Male
Posts: 281

01 Apr 2011, 9:09 am

I've always thought I had good intuition of people I will be friends with and who I will dislike.



aspie48
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,291
Location: up s**t creek with a fan as a paddle

01 Apr 2011, 10:16 am

i never date because i don't have the courage. i admire autistic people who have even started taking the first steps. sorry i don't have any advice



anbuend
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jul 2004
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,039

01 Apr 2011, 11:02 am

FWIW, when I dump the words, I don't use face-reading, I use movement-reading of the person's entire body. Very different process from the way NTs read people, with such different results that NTs have actually used me to ask me about certain things I could perceive about people.


_________________
"In my world it's a place of patterns and feel. In my world it's a haven for what is real. It's my world, nobody can steal it, but people like me, we live in the shadows." -Donna Williams


the_curmudge
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2010
Age: 74
Gender: Male
Posts: 612
Location: Florida

01 Apr 2011, 12:07 pm

Callista wrote:

I think you will probably do better if you just use the date to find out as much about her as you possibly can--what she likes to do, what her life is like, what she thinks is fun or annoying. Just try to find out if you have things in common, things you can do together that are fun. Establish a connection based on facts and common interests, if you can. I would find it awfully hard to connect with a total stranger on the first date (or even an acquaintance); but then, I'm asexual and my primary need for connection is intellectual and non-physical.

Far as I can tell, that first date is mostly for figuring out whether you have potential as a couple, and whether you want to give it a shot. So just try to learn from her who she is. Get a lot of information. And if you want to invite her to a second date, try something fun that you know she likes and that you also like. Dates don't have to be all about staring into each other's eyes. Having fun together is just as good, and takes the pressure off your weaker social skills. Or maybe you will find out that you have not found a potential romantic interest, but you have found a friend you like to spend time with. That's good too.


Wise words, Callista. I suspect eye- and face-reading contains a large percentage of projection, even for NT's. You have to know the person before you can "read" their mind. And if they're not compatible to begin with, why bother?



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,911
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

01 Apr 2011, 12:15 pm

I don't know how significant this is, but NTs(I suppose they are called here)...sometimes confuse my lack of eye contact for lack of intrest. When really its just harder for me to focus on what they say if I look them in the eye and its very uncomfortable unless I have known the person for long enough to be completly comfortable around them.

So I think anyone can make innaccurate assumptions about these kinds of things.



Callista
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,775
Location: Ohio, USA

02 Apr 2011, 11:58 pm

anbuend wrote:
FWIW, when I dump the words, I don't use face-reading, I use movement-reading of the person's entire body. Very different process from the way NTs read people, with such different results that NTs have actually used me to ask me about certain things I could perceive about people.
Hey, cool, that's how I read my cats! Not nearly as well as another cat could, though. I swear I've seen them getting annoyed with me when I don't get something that evidently ought to be obvious. But I like my furry roommates. They're very good company.


_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com

Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com


vetwithAS
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 4 Dec 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 165
Location: AZ

03 Apr 2011, 12:52 am

In my line of work (security) watching a person's eyes and hands tell me everything I need to know about their intentions. I have fairly well mastered it within this context. That being said, when it comes to reading a woman I'm interested in I'm unable to find the words to adequately describe how lost I am.



TeaEarlGreyHot
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 28,982
Location: California

03 Apr 2011, 12:58 am

anbuend wrote:
FWIW, when I dump the words, I don't use face-reading, I use movement-reading of the person's entire body. Very different process from the way NTs read people, with such different results that NTs have actually used me to ask me about certain things I could perceive about people.


This is how I read people, too. I still have difficulty, but it's better than trying to 'glimpse the soul in the eyes' or whatever it is people think eyes reveal. Eyes are completely devoid of any emotion/expression for me... when I actually look people in the eye.


_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.


Verdandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)

03 Apr 2011, 1:08 am

Callista wrote:
anbuend wrote:
FWIW, when I dump the words, I don't use face-reading, I use movement-reading of the person's entire body. Very different process from the way NTs read people, with such different results that NTs have actually used me to ask me about certain things I could perceive about people.
Hey, cool, that's how I read my cats! Not nearly as well as another cat could, though. I swear I've seen them getting annoyed with me when I don't get something that evidently ought to be obvious. But I like my furry roommates. They're very good company.


Yeah, I am pretty sure I can read cats and dogs at a level most NTs don't, although not necessarily as well as cats and dogs can. I know I usually have a much better sense that a dog is friendly than most people (who react as if threatened if they see a large dog). I also have an idea of body language that they respond to.

I bolded the one about getting annoyed because oh yes so much.



TeaEarlGreyHot
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 28,982
Location: California

03 Apr 2011, 1:14 am

I don't read animals any better than I read people. My cats are forever getting upset with me because of it.

Fickle animals, they are.


_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.


MooCow
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Feb 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 546
Location: Under your bed.

03 Apr 2011, 1:23 am

Verdandi wrote:
Callista wrote:
anbuend wrote:
FWIW, when I dump the words, I don't use face-reading, I use movement-reading of the person's entire body. Very different process from the way NTs read people, with such different results that NTs have actually used me to ask me about certain things I could perceive about people.
Hey, cool, that's how I read my cats! Not nearly as well as another cat could, though. I swear I've seen them getting annoyed with me when I don't get something that evidently ought to be obvious. But I like my furry roommates. They're very good company.


Yeah, I am pretty sure I can read cats and dogs at a level most NTs don't, although not necessarily as well as cats and dogs can. I know I usually have a much better sense that a dog is friendly than most people (who react as if threatened if they see a large dog). I also have an idea of body language that they respond to.

I bolded the one about getting annoyed because oh yes so much.


Same here, I can easily read a dog or cat, but with people I'm normally clueless. I think part of the reason I understand animals better is because they are a lot less complicated than humans, they have a fairly small pool of emotions compared to humans. also, they don't lie, they don't have ulterior motives.


_________________
I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it.
-Terry Pratchett


vetwithAS
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 4 Dec 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 165
Location: AZ

03 Apr 2011, 1:28 am

MooCow wrote:
, they don't have ulterior motives.


Either you haven't known many cats, or the ones we had when I was growing up were VERY unusual :lol:



TeaEarlGreyHot
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 28,982
Location: California

03 Apr 2011, 1:29 am

MooCow wrote:
they don't have ulterior motives.


You haven't met my cats... lol


_________________
Still looking for that blue jean baby queen, prettiest girl I've ever seen.


MooCow
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Feb 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 546
Location: Under your bed.

03 Apr 2011, 2:06 am

I don't know, all my cat's actions are motived by food, or killing me.


_________________
I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it.
-Terry Pratchett