I was "treated" with ECT when I was 16. I do not see the value for something that can be replaced with (more effective) intellectually oriented therapies, perhaps cognitive behavioral. It's exactly like what 2ukenkerl said, a kick to the t.v., hoping something good will happen. Some of my memories were destroyed, my personality was virtually non-existent afterward, and I lost some intellectual capacity. In a drastic emergency, perhaps it is an option. But there are always alternatives. I am not sure I understand the reasons behind treating ADHD with ECT; wouldn't that just make it worse?
gwenevyn wrote:
ECT is done for other people's benefit, not for the patient's benefit.
I agree. The "informed consent" principle for ECT is completely ridiculous. A patient being considered for this treatment isn't aware of their state of mind enough to know what is being presented to them.
Ernest Hemingway committed suicide after he was given ECT. He said, "It was a brilliant cure but we lost the patient..."