ToughDiamond wrote:
The first post of this topic
http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt96438.htmlsuggests that Simon has recommended a set of 10 criteria, all of which need to be met in order to be diagnosed positive for AS.......quite an unusual approach.
I was wondering if you noticed any evidence that he was actually using that method for your diagnosis, or whether he basically stuck to the standard DSM IV criteria?
Hmmm thats a tricky one. Well I'd submitted 3 questionnaires beforehand; the AQ, EQ and CAST which my sister filled out for me. The preliminanry screening form also asked how many of the 10 criteria i fullfilled.
During the assessment itself, he basically asked me to tell the story of why I'd referred myself. He then let me go on about social difficulties throughout school and university.
After a while,I guess he was convinced I fulfilled the social criteria so then said he wanted to change the direction of the assessment. He asked me to tell him about my obsessions and narrow interest. It was quite obvious that he was looking for signs of these at all stages of my life and even asked me what I current obsession is. He seemed quite impressed by my Rubik's cube solving and commented that it probably it isn't a conincidence that so many people he's assessed had cited it as their favourite toy.
When I was able to glance at the sheet of paper he was writing on, I did note some tickboxes which looked like he was filling out the AAA