ed wrote:
PhoenixWolf wrote:
Everywhere I know of in the US, the person changing lanes is 100% responsible to make sure it is safe to do so. If he hits you in the course of changing lanes, he is at fault no matter what.
How about if instead of deciding who's at fault we decide to prevent the accident from happening in the first place?
Because ours is a society predicated on finding fault. "Personal responsibility" (aka, fault) is the refrain of the masses to absolve themselves of responsibility.
Anyways, slowing down to let someone in is always a good idea. I've been driving for over a decade and have had no accidents yet, but it still scares me.
Also, I think that bit of legislation cited has more to do with merging on a highway than off a lane that is ending. Here's a thread from a U.S. police forum on the topic, stating that the onus is on the person merging to ensure a safe transition:
http://forums.officer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=74101
_________________
"The world is only as deep as we can see. This is why fools think themselves profound." - R. Scott Bakker, The Judging Eye