Superior fluid intelligence in children with Asperger's

Page 1 of 2 [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

monty
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Sep 2007
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,741

26 Dec 2007, 3:35 pm

Quote:
Brain Cogn. 2007 Nov 1
Superior fluid intelligence in children with Asperger's disorder.
Hayashi M, Kato M, Igarashi K, Kashima H.

Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.

Asperger's disorder is one of autistic spectrum disorders; sharing clinical features with autism, but without developmental delay in language acquisition. There have been some studies of intellectual functioning in autism so far, but very few in Asperger's disorder. In the present study, we investigated abstract reasoning ability, whose form of intelligence has been labeled fluid intelligence in the theory of Cattell [Cattell, R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 1-22.], in children with Asperger's disorder. A test of fluid intelligence, the Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices Test, was administered to 17 children with Asperger's disorder and 17 age-, gender-, and FIQ-matched normal children. The results showed that children with Asperger's disorder outperformed on the test of fluid reasoning than typically developing children. We suggest that individuals with Asperger's disorder have higher fluid reasoning ability than normal individuals, highlighting superior fluid intelligence.

PMID: 17980944



ouinon
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,939
Location: Europe

26 Dec 2007, 3:38 pm

Just going to hunt up tests/refs and descriptions of "fluid int".

:) :D 8)

" ability to find meaning in confusion, and solve new problems. Ability to draw inferences, ...etc"
........Like the inferences i have drawn which lead me to believe, ( a sensible and simple explanation which avoids all the hysteria and confusion surrounding the issue) :lol: , that the socially disabling aspects of "Aspergers/HFAS" are the result of the involuntary acting out by highly sensitive introverts ( the genetic element) of the socially impaired style behaviours of teachers in classrooms, an unconscious mechanism of "copying that which one resents"( that have power over you so that seem to have no choice in a situation); evolutionary advantages clear in the past (!), but not when copying teachers!! Highly sensitive introverts perhaps the most likely to resent teachers and the whole school exp.
Also most likely to suffer sensory issues , incl allergies etc. And unfortunately the worst degrees of poorly developed proprioceptive systems as a result of motor-skill-use deprivation now endemic in the West!

8)



Last edited by ouinon on 27 Dec 2007, 1:25 pm, edited 4 times in total.

ouinon
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,939
Location: Europe

26 Dec 2007, 4:04 pm

.. "pattern recognition"... like my suggesting that the medication and labelling and treatment of children in last 25 years looks uncannily like the wave of treatments of "female hysteria" 150 years ago, which heralded the womens rights movement.
Like my noticing that the descriptions of Aspergers/HFAS behaviours strangely resemble those of teachers in the classroom. ( excluding the sensory issues and motor problems as explained above)

??? :D
That sort of intelligence?

8)



asplanet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Nov 2007
Age: 65
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,258
Location: Cyberspace, New Zealand

26 Dec 2007, 4:46 pm

Montythanks for that, helps explain a few things...

I'm in my late 40's and was only diagnosed recently myself and was tested for Fluid reasoning and my automatic cognitive processing is advanced, which includes fluid reasoning and processing speed, even at my age :)

Well at least it explains why I always seem to be 10 steps ahead in general.

Its like when people are telling me things, like new process I pick it up really quickly and I move on, its not that I stop listening, I already get it and find if people try to over explain, I just shut off, as seems pointless to me and could say even bores me...


_________________
Face Book "Alyson Fiona Bradley "


Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

26 Dec 2007, 5:29 pm

This is interesting, the traditional perception has been that Aspies and Auties have superior crystallized intelligence (as stereotypically embodied in the photographic memories of savants such as Kim Peek and Daniel Tammet) but researchers have long maintained that we lack the capacity for advanced abstract thought (the whole "theory of mind" bit, along the assertions that we go into engineering because we need our work to be very concrete). So, if we have superior abilities in pattern recognition/ abstract reasoning ("fluid intelligence") and we have generally better memorization abilities, the basis for crystallized intelligence... again, this is interesting. It was previously thought that we had better memories but fell behind in abstract reasoning. If it turns out that Aspies in general really do have higher fluid intelligence in addition to our memories, it will prompt researchers to approach Asperger's in a fundamentally different way. Of course, one study with 17 Aspies vs 17 NTs is hardly conclusive. I look forward to any new research on this subject.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


JWRed
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 30 Nov 2007
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 301
Location: Malibu, California

26 Dec 2007, 7:16 pm

So what. Overall, we are less able to function in society than people with less fluid intelligence.



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

26 Dec 2007, 7:44 pm

JWRed wrote:
So what. Overall, we are less able to function in society than people with less fluid intelligence.

You're quite the pessimist. Sure we struggle with some things as we try to move through society but so does EVERYONE, Aspie or NT. The fact that we have some talents to make up for our deficits is encouraging. When it's a tradeoff between benefits and drawbacks, we're just different. If it's all negatives, we're defective. Also, what exactly do you mean by "function in society?" That's kind of a broad description and in most people's minds involves a rather long list of accomplishments, and most people can't claim every single one of them.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


monty
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Sep 2007
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,741

27 Dec 2007, 9:22 am

JWRed wrote:
So what. Overall, we are less able to function in society than people with less fluid intelligence.


Yes, social intelligence is a challenge. We have problems with subtle facial indicators that totally modify the meaning of words. We don't understand that sometimes "I'll call you" is a way of saying "get lost, I don't want to see you again."

As I see it, all we can do is embrace the skills we have, and try to learn in areas where we are weaker.



asplanet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Nov 2007
Age: 65
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,258
Location: Cyberspace, New Zealand

28 Dec 2007, 11:32 pm

Fluid intelligence is the ability to find meaning in confusion and solve new problems. It is the ability to draw inferences and understand the relationships of various concepts, independent of acquired knowledge..

Just wondering how many of you have and/or still can do the rubik cube!


_________________
Face Book "Alyson Fiona Bradley "


lastcrazyhorn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Oct 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,170
Location: Texas

29 Dec 2007, 12:45 am

asplanet wrote:
Fluid intelligence is the ability to find meaning in confusion and solve new problems. It is the ability to draw inferences and understand the relationships of various concepts, independent of acquired knowledge..

Just wondering how many of you have and/or still can do the rubik cube!


I never could solve it, but I got down to just have three unsolved squares a time or two. And I can always get one side.


_________________
"I am to misbehave" - Mal

BATMAN: I'll do everything I can to rehabilitate you.
CATWOMAN: Marry me.
BATMAN: Everything except that.

http://lastcrazyhorn.wordpress.com - "Odd One Out: Reality with a refreshing slice of aspie"


whipstitches
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2009
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 323
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada

12 May 2009, 1:02 pm

I recenlty took an IQ test as well as a cognative assessment and achievment assessment. My overall IQ wasn't that exciting (full scale 117/ general ability 120), but my congative fluency was in the 99th percentile (135) and decision speed was in the 99.8 percentile (143). I was wondernig how those scores compared to others on the spectrum? It seems that many of us may have crazy high scores in these areas despite having an IQ that is more or less average (maybe a little higher). I am no genius, but I have noticed that I seem to capture the essence of things much faster than most and I also tend to know almost right away that something is wrong, right, won't work, etc. and a good deal of the time I am correct. My shortcoming is not being able to explain "how" I know this. 8O

Often this takes the shape of being knowing that someones execution of a problem will fail... and exactly "how" it will fail with no way to further explain my statement other than "watch... it won't work... this is what will happen.....". When asked how I knew this would happen the only answer that I usually have is that I can "see it" inside of my head.

Stuff like that..... It makes people think that I am a know it all b***h, so I try to avoid it at all costs most of the time.



ouinon
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,939
Location: Europe

12 May 2009, 1:23 pm

ouinon wrote:
"Ability to find meaning in confusion, and solve new problems. Ability to draw inferences, etc"

Like the inferences I have drawn which lead me to believe, ( a sensible and simple explanation which avoids all the hysteria and confusion surrounding the issue :lol: ) , that the socially disabling aspects of "Aspergers/HFAS" are the result of the involuntary acting out by highly sensitive introverts ( the genetic element) of the socially impaired style behaviours of teachers in classrooms ... the most likely to suffer sensory issues , incl allergies etc, ... and [ tendency to poor/different ] development of proprioceptive systems as a result of motor-skill-use deprivation now endemic in the West ... ?

Ouch! :oops: That was a while ago ...! :oops: :lol:

Whipstitches; I once won a party game, ( and amazed my hosts :wink: ), using exactly the sort of "quick grasp of essentials" that you refer to. But it only applies to certain things. Certain kinds of "data" completely elude me, and stress/time-pressure massively reduces the ability.

.



alba
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 756

15 May 2009, 12:05 pm

The 2 year old, therefore fairly recent, Tokyo research Monty highlights in OP, is significant in terms of establishing how AS is more a matter of difference than disorder. Thanks Whipstitches for resurrecting it.

If such research is kept from being swept under the carpet, it will soon be obvious that, in some ways, Aspies have superior mental processing compared with NTs. Therefore to label superior mental functioning a disorder-- is clearly a misnomer.



ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

15 May 2009, 12:21 pm

I am much better at inferring than I am memorizing.



whipstitches
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2009
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 323
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada

15 May 2009, 2:35 pm

You're welcome Alba! :lol:

I agree that it seems like the IQ thing is sort of a nice diagnostic "accessory" rather than a true "tool". I have read a lot of different things since I made that previous post. I am now realizing that it isn't so much that "we" as a group are not highly intelligent, it is that the relative differences between areas of strenght and areas of weakness can be very large (more than one standard deviation). This causes us to have some mild - moderate learning disabilities. In fact, that is what I was just recently "reclassified" as having. My origingal assessment from about 9 years ago was ADD. Now it has been changed to Learning Disability Not Otherwise Specified. I have now officially been refered to a psychiatrist for the final "diagnosis" of AS/HFA/PDD-NOS... whatever one they end up giving me. The IQ information coupled with the ASD questions and the personal interviews are a very strong case for or against the diagnosis of an ASD, I think. I don't think IQ alone can tell anyone much of anything, however.

ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo wrote:
I am much better at inferring than I am memorizing.


You can say that again!! I hate to try and memorize things that aren't visual. Lists of terms and things like that can be challenging for me.

ouinon, way to go on the party game!! :lol: I have done similar stuff myself. Sometimes it makes you feel really good and others it makes you feel like a side show freak!! :lol:



LostInSpace
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Apr 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,617
Location: Dixie

15 May 2009, 6:28 pm

whipstitches wrote:
I agree that it seems like the IQ thing is sort of a nice diagnostic "accessory" rather than a true "tool". I have read a lot of different things since I made that previous post. I am now realizing that it isn't so much that "we" as a group are not highly intelligent, it is that the relative differences between areas of strenght and areas of weakness can be very large (more than one standard deviation). This causes us to have some mild - moderate learning disabilities. In fact, that is what I was just recently "reclassified" as having. My origingal assessment from about 9 years ago was ADD. Now it has been changed to Learning Disability Not Otherwise Specified.


That's also my official diagnosis (LD-NOS). Also, previous to this diagnosis, several psychologists thought I had ADD, so we have a similar diagnostic history. My diagnosis is actually (unofficially) Nonverbal Learning Disorder, but there is no diagnostic code for that, so they just included it in the eval write-up. Basically, I score at the ceiling of any test of verbal ability you can give me (except for auditory memory due to problems with auditory attention), but my nonverbal reasoning ability is only average and my visuo-spatial and perceptual skills are in the impaired range.


_________________
Not all those who wander are lost... but I generally am.