Board index › Off Topic Discussion › Off the Wall: Forum Games, Quizzes, Roleplaying, etc.

If WP had an army...(just for fun)

Page 13 of 13 [ 196 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13

Previous topic | Next topic

Jainaday
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,099
Location: in the They

19 Sep 2007, 7:42 pm

Anubis wrote:
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Bug swarms? Well, if these are mosquito variants I would simply use gas to eliminate the larger swarms and drain stagnant waters to prevent breeding. With other bugs I might rely more heavily upon gases though. Burnination could easily be dangerous unless these bugs are monstrous as burnination can damage stronger creatures as well as weaker ones. I will arrange for flying vehicles with gas bombs to deal with the bug issue.


Gas bombs can harm the environment more than napalm bombs, and possibly have very negative side effects, especially on such a scale in the atmosphere. Neutron bombs with low yields and virtually no fallout should also be used.


Wow. . . I thought "environmentally friendly military action" was an oxymoron. . .no, wait, I still think it's an oxymoron.

It's pretty cool though.


_________________
And if I die before I learn to speak
will money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep


iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

19 Sep 2007, 7:43 pm

Jainaday wrote:
Anubis wrote:
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Bug swarms? Well, if these are mosquito variants I would simply use gas to eliminate the larger swarms and drain stagnant waters to prevent breeding. With other bugs I might rely more heavily upon gases though. Burnination could easily be dangerous unless these bugs are monstrous as burnination can damage stronger creatures as well as weaker ones. I will arrange for flying vehicles with gas bombs to deal with the bug issue.


Gas bombs can harm the environment more than napalm bombs, and possibly have very negative side effects, especially on such a scale in the atmosphere. Neutron bombs with low yields and virtually no fallout should also be used.


Wow. . . I thought "environmentally friendly military action" was an oxymoron. . .no, wait, I still think it's an oxymoron.

It's pretty cool though.


:twisted:



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

19 Sep 2007, 8:36 pm

Anubis wrote:
Gas bombs can harm the environment more than napalm bombs, and possibly have very negative side effects, especially on such a scale in the atmosphere. Neutron bombs with low yields and virtually no fallout should also be used.

We are going to be targeting insects. We can control the dosage of toxin and type so that it mostly kills our target while leaving other elements of the environment safe. Napalm has very little range so we have to destroy everything in order to hit the target and neutron bombs will kill everything in the overall area.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

19 Sep 2007, 8:43 pm

Image