David1981 wrote:
I got it right too. I wouldn't worry much about it, though.
The fact that she killed her sister in order to see the man again is the most logical answer. You see, if she met the man at the mother's funeral, logic suggests the gentleman in question was a family friend. Ergo, by killing another member of her (and vicariously, her mother's) family, the chances were high that said gentleman would reappear, thus giving her a chance to meet him again and receive the information that she didn't receive the first time.
In order for one to be a psychopath, wouldn't one need to commit such an act, or at the least, seriously consider it? Just figuring out the why she did what she did does not make one a psychopath. If this were not the case, wouldn't every police detective be, by extension, a psychopath?
Yeah, that would mean like all detectives are insane. If anybody thinks about that long enough, they would eventually find the right answer, and I never give up on riddles and stuff, I always have to figure stuff out, so I woulda figured it out eventually, but I just happen to get it pretty quick cause I'm smart.