fiddlerpianist wrote:
Tantybi wrote:
I didn't say all marriages are like mine or you are living in lalaland. I said certain things happen in marriages and those who suggest otherwise are living in lalaland.
"Like yours" in that you have to resort to "certain techniques", not completely "like yours." Sorry that was not more obvious.
By "certain techniques" you meant this:
Tantybi wrote:
Guilt trips, you can't tell me you never tried to make a man feel guilty about doing you wrong? You can't tell me either that in all the years you've been married your man has never made a mistake you had to deal with, whether you dealt with it using arguments, whining, guilt trips, or what have ya, you can't tell me your relationship has been 100% perfect from day one. If you really think that where you never had to resort to any type of psychological technique to improve the situation, then I will tell you for certain that you are in la la land.
If, by psychological techniques, you mean engaging in open dialog, then I agree with you. However, I don't think that's what you mean. There's an air of subversity to the psychological techniques you describe. My wife and I do not play psychological games. Period.
Tantybi wrote:
The tactic you claim I use? Wow, were you not the one telling me in another post that models (i.e. paradigms) do not really relate to real life.
No, actually. I said that a model cannot paint a complete picture. I never said that it does not relate to real life in some way. If that were the case, it would be a pretty crappy model.
Tantybi wrote:
That's all the woman has to work from, a paradigm created in her mind, in her opinion. Yeah, I discount it when I realize it in no way relates to real life.
It goes both ways, then. Your opinion is invalidated when you speak about anything that you have no experience dealing with. Your opinion about being on welfare: invalid. Your opinion about working an forty-hour a week job for a corporation to support your family: irrelevant. Your opinion about the nature of marriages whose core nature is nothing like yours: useless.
Open dialogue is the technique I use since it is required for every technique I've ever used. So yeah, that would be included.
You can claim your marriage is perfect and does not have guilt trips or rewards going on in it all you want, but I'm a doubting it. I could be wrong, but still I'm a doubtinher.
Her model was only a small wittle portion of my whole picture.
I do have experience being on welfare as stated. So my opinion, validated. Working 40 hours a week for a corporation to support your family...again validated. Been there and done that. Nature of marriages whose core nature is nothing like mine, then it isn't a marriage you speak of, or it's probably more dysfunctional than what I'm dealing with because see, I deal with my problems rather than pretending they don't exist or pretending I'm on such a high horse that I'm too good to deal with them.
and on
Quote:
You used none of those arguments against her when you originally posted. You basically said, "You're a mom; you don't understand." To suggest that there were other factors at play here is, frankly, a bit disingenuous.
It also sounds like you care way too much about how others think you are raising your child. Is this what it's like to be NT? I think this plays perfectly into parental insecurity. We worry about what other people think about the way we raise kids as a sort of external validation that we are doing it correctly. Sure, if you have faith in society's opinion of you, I could see how this would be very hard. But when you know you are doing your best and giving your child what you consider to be the best, everyone else's opinion does not matter.
It also sounds like you care way too much about how others think you are raising your child. Is this what it's like to be NT? I think this plays perfectly into parental insecurity. We worry about what other people think about the way we raise kids as a sort of external validation that we are doing it correctly. Sure, if you have faith in society's opinion of you, I could see how this would be very hard. But when you know you are doing your best and giving your child what you consider to be the best, everyone else's opinion does not matter.
I can't really speak my whole mind here. But to sum up that arguments is basically, you are not a mom so therefore you wouldn't know everything being a mom entails. Saspie does not sound like an idiot to me. I really believe if she wore my shoes for a week, her opinions would be very different than what she's stating.
To suggest other factors at play is disingenous? No, what really lacks sincerity is when someone tells you that you are wrong and you are a horrible person for handling a situation the way you are handling it, and I know absolutely nothing about your situation nor do I want to and because of you, I really don't want to, and to be honest, I just don't think I can handle your situation so I avoid it, but I still have a strong opinion about what you should do.
I do know I'm doing my best at raising my kids. Other people's opinions do matter though, and your best isn't always good enough. You do or you don't in this world. THere is no such thing as try. Doctors, Landlords, social workers, etc. all of them have an opinion about my ability to take care of my family. If their opinion of me is shy of decent, they are required by law to start the process to have my abilities investigated by complete morons in a completely political and biased world who have the power to remove my children from my home no matter if my kids need it or not (we call it CPS). it won't stop there. When my kids are in the school system, everyone's opinion of me will reflect on my kids (the way they view my kids, and the way they treat them). Law enforcement (very small town here) will be the same way. It's called creating an image of yourself, and it's very important in an NT world, but you are more than welcome to jump on the Aspergia bandwagon if you don't like it.
Tantybi wrote:
Exactly. You would do something very similar to what I'm doing that you so strongly believe against. IN fact your opinion on the subject contradicts itself. Leaving a man because he doesn't fit your expectations is okay, but telling him you are going to leave him if he doesn't change is bullying.
You are staying in a crappy relationship. It is very different to what I would do. I would not tell a man to change or I'd leave him. I'd leave someone so as to not change them. People rarely change.
Quote:
Don't make out that it's unacceptable to use my methods. You are not God and you got to remove yourself from that pedestal you think you stand on.
I can say what I want. I think your methods are unacceptable. It's my opinion. You don't agree. Big deal.
Quote:
Your techniques? Let's see, instead of just being, I feel this and I feel that, you are saying, You are wrong. You've brought my kids into it, by how I'm setting the example, which is a form of guilt because it's saying that what I"m doing is bad to my kids in your opinion. Like maybe if I thought about my kids I would change my mind and cave in to say you are right and I am wrong. You also point out many times how your mom is better than me because she got dumped and didn't have to be in my situation (which our men are two different stories as mine isn't cheating on me with another woman nor does he have a cocaine addiction), and you do not wish to be me, and because of me, you do not wish to have kids. That's insulting and also a form of serious bullying and abuse. If you talk like that to your husband, you are worse than me. IN fact, the idea that you talk like that to me makes you a little worse than me. I have never pretended that you are such an awful person that I'm glad I'm not you.
That is not a technique, that is my opinion. If you do not like it, you cannot just claim I am using some psychological trick on you. That doesn't make sense. I could say the reverse about you but I think it is fine for those to express their opinions. I am not attacking you, I am attacking your methods. You seem to have a real problem with someone disagreeing with you and I cannot work out why... I never said my mother was better than you, I used her as an example of how things can work out after marriage break ups. But of course, she is my mother and I think the world of her so if you must know I do think she is better than you, but she is better than all mothers I know
Anyway you keep reading things into my posts that simply are not there. I say exactly what I mean but you keep saying I am implying things. I really dislike to talk to people like that as it is so unproductive so I'll leave it here.
Saspie wrote:
Tantybi wrote:
Exactly. You would do something very similar to what I'm doing that you so strongly believe against. IN fact your opinion on the subject contradicts itself. Leaving a man because he doesn't fit your expectations is okay, but telling him you are going to leave him if he doesn't change is bullying.
You are staying in a crappy relationship. It is very different to what I would do. I would not tell a man to change or I'd leave him. I'd leave someone so as to not change them. People rarely change.
Quote:
Don't make out that it's unacceptable to use my methods. You are not God and you got to remove yourself from that pedestal you think you stand on.
I can say what I want. I think your methods are unacceptable. It's my opinion. You don't agree. Big deal.
Quote:
Your techniques? Let's see, instead of just being, I feel this and I feel that, you are saying, You are wrong. You've brought my kids into it, by how I'm setting the example, which is a form of guilt because it's saying that what I"m doing is bad to my kids in your opinion. Like maybe if I thought about my kids I would change my mind and cave in to say you are right and I am wrong. You also point out many times how your mom is better than me because she got dumped and didn't have to be in my situation (which our men are two different stories as mine isn't cheating on me with another woman nor does he have a cocaine addiction), and you do not wish to be me, and because of me, you do not wish to have kids. That's insulting and also a form of serious bullying and abuse. If you talk like that to your husband, you are worse than me. IN fact, the idea that you talk like that to me makes you a little worse than me. I have never pretended that you are such an awful person that I'm glad I'm not you.
That is not a technique, that is my opinion. If you do not like it, you cannot just claim I am using some psychological trick on you. That doesn't make sense. I could say the reverse about you but I think it is fine for those to express their opinions. I am not attacking you, I am attacking your methods. You seem to have a real problem with someone disagreeing with you and I cannot work out why... I never said my mother was better than you, I used her as an example of how things can work out after marriage break ups. But of course, she is my mother and I think the world of her so if you must know I do think she is better than you, but she is better than all mothers I know
Anyway you keep reading things into my posts that simply are not there. I say exactly what I mean but you keep saying I am implying things. I really dislike to talk to people like that as it is so unproductive so I'll leave it here.
Whether you realize it or not, and whether you intended it or not, you still use the same methods that you argue are awful methods to use.
fiddlerpianist
Veteran
Joined: 30 Apr 2009
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,821
Location: The Autistic Hinterlands
Tantybi wrote:
fiddlerpianist wrote:
Tantybi wrote:
I didn't say all marriages are like mine or you are living in lalaland. I said certain things happen in marriages and those who suggest otherwise are living in lalaland.
"Like yours" in that you have to resort to "certain techniques", not completely "like yours." Sorry that was not more obvious.
Tantybi wrote:
Guilt trips, you can't tell me you never tried to make a man feel guilty about doing you wrong? You can't tell me either that in all the years you've been married your man has never made a mistake you had to deal with, whether you dealt with it using arguments, whining, guilt trips, or what have ya, you can't tell me your relationship has been 100% perfect from day one. If you really think that where you never had to resort to any type of psychological technique to improve the situation, then I will tell you for certain that you are in la la land.
Tantybi wrote:
Open dialogue is the technique I use since it is required for every technique I've ever used. So yeah, that would be included.
Heh. Sorry, I don't believe you. Your words when your guard is down speak louder than the words you speak now.
Tantybi wrote:
You can claim your marriage is perfect and does not have guilt trips or rewards going on in it all you want, but I'm a doubting it. I could be wrong, but still I'm a doubtinher.
And the basis for your opinion is what? Oh right, you don't have any idea what it's like to have a marriage which is based on open, honest communication. You wouldn't understand.
Tantybi wrote:
Nature of marriages whose core nature is nothing like mine, then it isn't a marriage you speak of, or it's probably more dysfunctional than what I'm dealing with because see, I deal with my problems rather than pretending they don't exist or pretending I'm on such a high horse that I'm too good to deal with them.
Those are some really wild assumptions. Where did I say that my relationship doesn't have issues? How did you get the idea that I feel that I'm "too good to deal with them"?
I think I get it now. You're frustrated and backed into a corner, so your only option is to fling mud. Why are you so desperately trying to prove that you are right to people who simply aren't going to agree with you? It's probably better off for this thread to simply end.
_________________
"That leap of logic should have broken his legs." - Janissy
fiddlerpianist wrote:
Tantybi wrote:
fiddlerpianist wrote:
Tantybi wrote:
I didn't say all marriages are like mine or you are living in lalaland. I said certain things happen in marriages and those who suggest otherwise are living in lalaland.
"Like yours" in that you have to resort to "certain techniques", not completely "like yours." Sorry that was not more obvious.
Tantybi wrote:
Guilt trips, you can't tell me you never tried to make a man feel guilty about doing you wrong? You can't tell me either that in all the years you've been married your man has never made a mistake you had to deal with, whether you dealt with it using arguments, whining, guilt trips, or what have ya, you can't tell me your relationship has been 100% perfect from day one. If you really think that where you never had to resort to any type of psychological technique to improve the situation, then I will tell you for certain that you are in la la land.
Tantybi wrote:
Open dialogue is the technique I use since it is required for every technique I've ever used. So yeah, that would be included.
Heh. Sorry, I don't believe you. Your words when your guard is down speak louder than the words you speak now.
Tantybi wrote:
You can claim your marriage is perfect and does not have guilt trips or rewards going on in it all you want, but I'm a doubting it. I could be wrong, but still I'm a doubtinher.
And the basis for your opinion is what? Oh right, you don't have any idea what it's like to have a marriage which is based on open, honest communication. You wouldn't understand.
Tantybi wrote:
Nature of marriages whose core nature is nothing like mine, then it isn't a marriage you speak of, or it's probably more dysfunctional than what I'm dealing with because see, I deal with my problems rather than pretending they don't exist or pretending I'm on such a high horse that I'm too good to deal with them.
Those are some really wild assumptions. Where did I say that my relationship doesn't have issues? How did you get the idea that I feel that I'm "too good to deal with them"?
I think I get it now. You're frustrated and backed into a corner, so your only option is to fling mud. Why are you so desperately trying to prove that you are right to people who simply aren't going to agree with you? It's probably better off for this thread to simply end.
So are you saying your approach to the argument being, "I"m right and you're wrong, end of discussion" is much more successful than my appraoch? At least in your approach, whose the dog and whose the master is much more obvious.
fiddlerpianist
Veteran
Joined: 30 Apr 2009
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,821
Location: The Autistic Hinterlands
Tantybi wrote:
fiddlerpianist wrote:
Tantybi wrote:
I didn't say all marriages are like mine or you are living in lalaland. I said certain things happen in marriages and those who suggest otherwise are living in lalaland.
"Like yours" in that you have to resort to "certain techniques", not completely "like yours." Sorry that was not more obvious.
Tantybi wrote:
Guilt trips, you can't tell me you never tried to make a man feel guilty about doing you wrong? You can't tell me either that in all the years you've been married your man has never made a mistake you had to deal with, whether you dealt with it using arguments, whining, guilt trips, or what have ya, you can't tell me your relationship has been 100% perfect from day one. If you really think that where you never had to resort to any type of psychological technique to improve the situation, then I will tell you for certain that you are in la la land.
Tantybi wrote:
Open dialogue is the technique I use since it is required for every technique I've ever used. So yeah, that would be included.
Heh. Sorry, I don't believe you. Your words when your guard is down speak louder than the words you speak now.
Tantybi wrote:
You can claim your marriage is perfect and does not have guilt trips or rewards going on in it all you want, but I'm a doubting it. I could be wrong, but still I'm a doubtinher.
And the basis for your opinion is what? Oh right, you don't have any idea what it's like to have a marriage which is based on open, honest communication. You wouldn't understand.
Tantybi wrote:
Nature of marriages whose core nature is nothing like mine, then it isn't a marriage you speak of, or it's probably more dysfunctional than what I'm dealing with because see, I deal with my problems rather than pretending they don't exist or pretending I'm on such a high horse that I'm too good to deal with them.
Those are some really wild assumptions. Where did I say that my relationship doesn't have issues? How did you get the idea that I feel that I'm "too good to deal with them"?
I think I get it now. You're frustrated and backed into a corner, so your only option is to fling mud. Why are you so desperately trying to prove that you are right to people who simply aren't going to agree with you? It's probably better off for this thread to simply end.
So are you saying your approach to the argument being, "I"m right and you're wrong, end of discussion" is much more successful than my appraoch? At least in your approach, whose the dog and whose the master is much more obvious.
There's that saying... it goes like this:
Quote:
Never wrestle with a pig: You both get all dirty, and the pig likes it.
I've already gotten my hands muddier than I would like. Have a great day.
_________________
"That leap of logic should have broken his legs." - Janissy
fiddlerpianist wrote:
Tantybi wrote:
fiddlerpianist wrote:
Tantybi wrote:
I didn't say all marriages are like mine or you are living in lalaland. I said certain things happen in marriages and those who suggest otherwise are living in lalaland.
"Like yours" in that you have to resort to "certain techniques", not completely "like yours." Sorry that was not more obvious.
Tantybi wrote:
Guilt trips, you can't tell me you never tried to make a man feel guilty about doing you wrong? You can't tell me either that in all the years you've been married your man has never made a mistake you had to deal with, whether you dealt with it using arguments, whining, guilt trips, or what have ya, you can't tell me your relationship has been 100% perfect from day one. If you really think that where you never had to resort to any type of psychological technique to improve the situation, then I will tell you for certain that you are in la la land.
Tantybi wrote:
Open dialogue is the technique I use since it is required for every technique I've ever used. So yeah, that would be included.
Heh. Sorry, I don't believe you. Your words when your guard is down speak louder than the words you speak now.
Tantybi wrote:
You can claim your marriage is perfect and does not have guilt trips or rewards going on in it all you want, but I'm a doubting it. I could be wrong, but still I'm a doubtinher.
And the basis for your opinion is what? Oh right, you don't have any idea what it's like to have a marriage which is based on open, honest communication. You wouldn't understand.
Tantybi wrote:
Nature of marriages whose core nature is nothing like mine, then it isn't a marriage you speak of, or it's probably more dysfunctional than what I'm dealing with because see, I deal with my problems rather than pretending they don't exist or pretending I'm on such a high horse that I'm too good to deal with them.
Those are some really wild assumptions. Where did I say that my relationship doesn't have issues? How did you get the idea that I feel that I'm "too good to deal with them"?
I think I get it now. You're frustrated and backed into a corner, so your only option is to fling mud. Why are you so desperately trying to prove that you are right to people who simply aren't going to agree with you? It's probably better off for this thread to simply end.
So are you saying your approach to the argument being, "I"m right and you're wrong, end of discussion" is much more successful than my appraoch? At least in your approach, whose the dog and whose the master is much more obvious.
There's that saying... it goes like this:
Quote:
Never wrestle with a pig: You both get all dirty, and the pig likes it.
I've already gotten my hands muddier than I would like. Have a great day.
See, now you are making me hungry. I love pork
Either way, I have no problem with people disagreeing with me. But it's one thing to say, "well I don't care for how you put it" or even "that advice isn't for me," but it's another thing to say, "You are all these bad things for saying this or thinking that." You and a few others didn't just disagree with me. No y'all judged me. Sorry if I stood up for myself there and threw some mud your way... I was only returning what was already yours.
Greentea wrote:
Tantybi wrote:
See, now you are making me hungry. I love pork
I was just eating the chicken club from McDonalds, and they cooked that bacon to perfection. Now I really really want another one, but like without the chicken and cheese...yeah, just the BLT, and better on a McMuffin than that bun. MMMMmmmmmMMMMmmmmmMMMMMmmmmmm..