Dasha wrote:
I did once read an article that those with out friends or close family died younger.
I think it's any form of community, and it's been suggested that this is also behind the findings that people involved in a formal religion tend to live longer. The real question is whether being part of a different type of community - such as a virtual community, like this one - which is becoming a more and more common way for people in general, NTs too, to interact in this day and age, is similarly beneficial.
Quote:
So I guess children can be like a blank canvas for an artist, or manuscript for a song writer. A medium on which to transcribe yourself, but never truly you as it retains it's own original characteristics underneath your additions.
sunshower....this is exactly what I think is very wrong with many people's way of seeing children. Ask someone who was raised to be 'just like mommy' by someone with a very different personality; profoundly damaging, and makes working out who you are and what you really want to do with your life a heck of a lot harder. Personality traits can, of course, rub off - for good or bad - but a parent who
sets out to make a child into 'mini me' is doing it out of pure ego, and probably isn't mentally fit to have a child in the first place.
Ambivalence:
Quote:
To become immortal we would have to lose ourselves.
...is exactly what mystics have always pointed out. Most attempts at immortality of any kind (kids, achievements, prolonging physical life, even a individualized religious afterlife) are to do with the little limited self, the ego, wanting to survive.
Lose the ego, which is what keeps us conscious of separation, and you become conscious of Something that has never born and never dies...which is what you really are underneath. Not easy, of course, but the only route to eternity which is guaranteed to work, for every last one of us. (Eventually!)
_________________
"Grunge? Isn't that some gross shade of greenish orange?"