Frustrated with the Millennials

Page 6 of 9 [ 135 posts ] Go to page Previous 1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Next

ASS-P
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 9 Feb 2007
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,980
Location: Santa Cruz , CA , USA

03 Jan 2017, 6:50 pm

...I put up what was intended to be an addition to this line but it ended up going up on its own - It also had : Millenials : as well as : Boomers : in the header .

_________________
Renal kidney failure, congestive heart failure, COPD. Can't really get up from a floor position unhelped anymore:-(.
One of the walking wounded ~ SMASHED DOWN by life and age, now prevented from even expressing myself! SOB.
" Oh, no! First you have to PROVE you deserve to go away to college! " ~ My mother, 1978 (the heyday of Andy Gibb and Player). I would still like to go. :-(

My life destroyed by Thorazine and Mellaril - and rape - and the Psychiatric/Industrial Complex. SOB:-(! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !!

androbot01
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,746
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada

03 Jan 2017, 7:15 pm

Shahunshah wrote:

If anything what we millennials have now may be an improvement.

How so?

RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,060
Location: Adelaide, Australia

04 Jan 2017, 6:35 am

androbot01 wrote:

Shahunshah wrote:

Okay but can we ultimately rid of this assumption about millennials?

Millennials are more exposed to media than previous generations. Your generation even more so. Technology has been around since they started honing flint to hunt, but it has never changed so quickly in so many ways before.

Too much media. It's like drinking from a firehose. You get so many conflicting reports. It's always their word against their word and there's no proof from either side.

_________________
The days are long, but the years are short

androbot01
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,746
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada

04 Jan 2017, 7:51 am

RetroGamer87 wrote:

androbot01 wrote:

Shahunshah wrote:

Okay but can we ultimately rid of this assumption about millennials?

Too much media. It's like drinking from a firehose. You get so many conflicting reports. It's always their word against their word and there's no proof from either side.

That's why research is so important.

RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,060
Location: Adelaide, Australia

04 Jan 2017, 7:53 am

androbot01 wrote:

RetroGamer87 wrote:

androbot01 wrote:

Shahunshah wrote:

Okay but can we ultimately rid of this assumption about millennials?

Too much media. It's like drinking from a firehose. You get so many conflicting reports. It's always their word against their word and there's no proof from either side.

That's why research is so important.

True but sometimes I feel like more research leads me to more lies. I want to avoid confirmation bias and the echo chamber effect so that's why I try to read both sides of the debate.

_________________
The days are long, but the years are short

androbot01
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,746
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada

04 Jan 2017, 7:58 am

RetroGamer87 wrote:

True but sometimes I feel like more research leads me to more lies. I want to avoid confirmation bias and the echo chamber effect so that's why I try to read both sides of the debate.

I agree; it is good to become familiar with both sides. More research does lead to more lies, but more truths as well.

SpiceWolf
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 802

04 Jan 2017, 9:11 am

Hessiod 8th Century BC wrote:

"I see no hope for the future of our people if they are dependent on frivolous youth of today, for certainly all youth are reckless beyond words... When I was young, we were taught to be discreet and respectful of elders, but the present youth are exceedingly wise [disrespectful] and impatient of restraint".

Peter the Hermit 1274 wrote:

"The world is passing through troublous times. The young people of today think of nothing but themselves. They have no reverence for parents or old age. They are impatient of all restraint. They talk as if they knew everything, and what passes for wisdom with us is foolishness with them. As for the girls, they are forward, immodest and unladylike in speech, behaviour and dress."

"It's all just a little bit of history ... ... ... "

SpiceWolf
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 802

04 Jan 2017, 9:25 am

I have no illusions the young of today are faultless, they surely have their faults, so do their elders.
None of us are perfect.

It's not that each generation gets worse and worse, it's that people often fail to perceive their own faults and the faults of their own generation.

Or if they do perceive them, it's often through rose and sepia tinted glasses.

At other times it's that the new generation does things their own way. Not a better or worse way, just different, and therefore it feels, strange and uncomfortable to the old.

RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,060
Location: Adelaide, Australia

04 Jan 2017, 4:17 pm

Peter the Hermit 1274 wrote:

As for the girls, they are forward, immodest and unladylike in speech, behaviour and dress."

Good. I hope their style of dress becomes even more immodest so I can have something nice to look at.

The slutwalk protests are my favourite aspect of feminism.

_________________
The days are long, but the years are short

Shahunshah
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,225
Location: NZ

04 Jan 2017, 8:00 pm

androbot01 wrote:

Shahunshah wrote:

If anything what we millennials have now may be an improvement.

How so?

I will tell you why. In the 90s people wouldn't be doing critical thinking either. They could simply choose which media they would want to watch CNN, Fox News, Rush Limbaugh etc and their opinions would likely never change. This has arguably changed for the better with the internet. Now with better communication people have a greater opportunity to converse and share perspectives. I feel as though you are no longer entirely shut in your bubble. What's also true is that with Wikipedia people now have a chance to look at objective facts and make their judgement from their rather than have their perspective tainted with bias.

starkid
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 9 Feb 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,812
Location: California Bay Area

04 Jan 2017, 10:13 pm

Shahunshah wrote:

What's also true is that with Wikipedia people now have a chance to look at objective facts and make their judgement from their rather than have their perspective tainted with bias.

Wikipedia is your example of an unbiased source?! The fact that anyone can edit it and no one ensures that it's vetted with any relevant expertise makes it more susceptible to bias than most sources.

Shahunshah
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,225
Location: NZ

04 Jan 2017, 10:18 pm

starkid wrote:

Shahunshah wrote:

What's also true is that with Wikipedia people now have a chance to look at objective facts and make their judgement from their rather than have their perspective tainted with bias.

Wikipedia has editors that regularly go through the site and look for these kinds of biases. In the 2016 Wikipedia article I was responsible for creating the section about the 2010 midterm elections. As soon as I labelled the tea Party movement "Partisan" that was quickly edited out.

RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,060
Location: Adelaide, Australia

04 Jan 2017, 10:20 pm

Other websites are no better than Wikipedia because anyone can make a website.

_________________
The days are long, but the years are short

starkid
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 9 Feb 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,812
Location: California Bay Area

04 Jan 2017, 10:26 pm

Shahunshah wrote:

Wikipedia has editors that regularly go through the site and look for these kinds of biases.

Unpaid editors with no relevant expertise? What assurance does anyone have that they remove bias or don't introduce it themselves, in comparison to typical professional editors?

Quote:

In the 2016 Wikipedia article I was responsible for creating the section about the 2010 midterm elections. As soon as I labelled the tea Party movement "Partisan" that was quickly edited out.

Is this supposed to be an example of the Wikipedia editors removing bias? The Tea Party movement is partisan! All political movements are inherently partisan. There's no bias in calling a political movement partisan.

starkid
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 9 Feb 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,812
Location: California Bay Area

04 Jan 2017, 10:30 pm

RetroGamer87 wrote:

Other websites are no better than Wikipedia because anyone can make a website.

We are discussing Wikipedia as an information source, not Wikipedia as a website. It's not comparable to every other website because most websites were not intended to be a source of facts.

kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

04 Jan 2017, 10:37 pm

Wikipedia, to me, is a very good resource.

Many of the articles claim many sources.

Page 6 of 9 [ 135 posts ] Go to page Previous 1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Next

Jump to:

Frustrated with the Millennials Post Reply New Topic

Frustrated with the Millennials