AS and Egocentricity?
I put this here because I want a more depth mature answer and some good concrete advice.
A good amount of my social problems come from the fact that i have not developed beyond the ego central thought process. Its like that saying, God is self = Autism.
I split everything naturally between what applies to me and what doesn't apply to me. What is me and what isn't me.
Before it gets categorized into anything further it is linked with, "this is me, this is not me."
I'm sure if you look at my posts you'll see I do a lot of self reference.
When I look at someone's post I automatically think, "this is like me, this is not like me." From there, I build my analysis, conclusion, ect.
This is both good and bad but it comes in to major play with my roommate, really the only human contact I have. She is a big feeler and while she is smart, it still gets to her.
Of course, when she brings up that she is upset with me I automatically crumble and it isn't because I upset her, they are because I FAILED. The emotional components never last long either they are weak and surface and I soon detach to deal with things again, rationally and logically. She can not stand this. (but has gotten better)
The situation was as follows,
She came to me with the idea that she might have skin cancer. First of all, because I will only talk to someone about something if it is a well thought out idea and has significant amount of proof behind its conclusion I automatically assume this is how others will work. I don't understand the idea of telling someone something for the sake of telling them. I went almost a year not telling her one of my personal opinions on something that happened between us because I did not see the need of it. It was an event that was done and over with and I was completely oblivious to how much damage it did and how it was eating away at her day after day after day. After that, it got a little better and than I went right back to how I have always been. Silent, in my own mind, my own world, egocentric. Logic logic logic, oblivious to emotion.
She just told me that she was phoning the doctor for a physical and that she might have skin cancer and nothing more, I could not for the life of me figure out why she thought it was important to bring this up if there was nothing else to it and so I reacted based on previous studies and judgments I have made about her. I know this is not a good idea because it never works out well. She is a feeler, she is irrational, I will never understand how she thinks end of story. I'd probably be able to write a book of analysis of her but because theres five million exceptions to all the rules it would take eons and be rather unreadable. You cannot logically analyze someone of pure heart impulse. Damn this reality. I MUST KNOW EVERYTHING THAT PERTAINS TO MY WORLD, because I am incredible and can do anything and I'm always right and all of that.
So what did I do.. Well I reacted with first thought analysis. Being that I'm a long range thinker I don't do well responding to a question right than and there but since I cannot understand why she said such a thing with no closure I act and fail.
I respond, "Well, technically everyone has cancer you know? You're not going to die this instant but it really doesn't matter because skin cancer or not we're all going to die eventually right?" as if this would ease her anxiety and obscene fear of death (something I also often lack because of my extreme detachment of emotions, even if they do reside in me they are never applied right. I'm so oblivious to the world and figure that No.. this car wont hit me it will stop and if it doesn't than its stupid and I'll sue the bastard.) Well it didn't, but she took it well and said nothing like "that didn't help, lets talk this through. I feel ______ about this situation, I'm telling you this situation because of ______, what should I do?"
So this got me thinking, I never wear sunscreen what if I have cancer? While I think constantly inside my head I do apply thinking out loud as well and because she was there and she brought up the topic I started thinking over the possibilities of me having skin cancer and what would I do about it. Because she had knowledge to exchange in this topic as I am poor and have not lived in this area as long as she did I expected she would be interested in verbal strategic. Because I'm poor, I have no family doctor and all of that it went in to a big huge spiral of the workings of the health system, the possibilities of what could be and how to counter them. The millions of ways to work around these complications. Ect, strategic brainstorming you could say. Of course because I am most definitely not a feeler I figure she too was utilizing these idea's or applying them to her own situation.. ect, ect instead of focusing on how I feel about the situation because, I didn't really feel about the situation at all.
I KNOW she doesn't work this way, why can I not grasp this?
The idea that she had not thought through it on her own before she came to me with this bout of information did not strike me as I never really say anything unless I have not thought it out before hand or as I stated above, if I do not have extensive proof.
Stupid? Well yes, at the time I figured it was appropriate. How? No idea, I feel like an incompetent buffoon. You would figure that being housed by irrational feelers all my life I would know more about this subject. Egocentricity says: NOT. Cannot connect.
So time moves on, a half hour comes by and she comes out with how she is pissed off at me. (which is an improvement, usually she would let it build and build until it exploded and than completely overload me with so much emotions I panic and almost stopped breathing once.) Of course, brain automatically concludes the following:
You are a natural scientist, a brilliant man and YOU CAN'T UNDERSTAND A WOMAN FEELER? YOU FAIL. Leading to, YOU ALWAYS DO THIS, YOU HAVE LEARNED NOTHING.
And the ultimate INTJ insult, You are incompetent, incapable of learning, incapable of understanding.
And shut down completely. I sat in the closet staring at the wall racking my brain over what I did wrong, how I am going to rationalize this. How can I logically fix and attack this problem? How do I understand her, how can I better enhance things? How can I battle emotions with logic? What is my problem, why do I always think like this? Why could I not see the outcome of this when I can see the outcome of things like this when I am not involved, when I am completely detached and just observing? This must mean I am stupid, I am missing something, I cannot work properly. I must be incapable and non functioning. It just went on and on and on forever.
Now that I've written an essay, I ask does anyone else have these problem? Is there anyone else that thinks like this?
Idea's, comments, feedback. Anything would be nice.
Its a problem that comes up and has come up with EVERYTHING having to do with NTs.
I know what you mean, when I look back at things, I know exactly what I should have done about stuff far too often, its just at the time this wisdom amazingly eludes me, leaving me in the lurch to make stupid decisions. Is it possibly what Temple Grandin refers to being an observer of life?
I find the looking back (observing) is often terribly logical - and so therefore becomes a simplified model since the eventual outcome is already known.
When doing risk assessments, there are 2 main ways of mapping the risks, in one you start from the start, and calculate all of the possible outcomes, the other you take a possible outcome and work back to see what could cause it.
I feel that with problems like the mentioned I can do the latter, but struggle witht he former. WIth the former, there simply are too many possible things to go wrong, and your brain cannot cope. A more NT mind is possibly able to simplfy the model sufficiently before it all occurs to work out the logical things to do, whereas a more AS mind is likely unable to do that, and so must work from the other end.
Having just written that, I see now why I have so many brilliant pieces of hindsight... and people say its bad to look to the past?!?
I know what you mean, when I look back at things, I know exactly what I should have done about stuff far too often, its just at the time this wisdom amazingly eludes me, leaving me in the lurch to make stupid decisions. Is it possibly what Temple Grandin refers to being an observer of life?
I find the looking back (observing) is often terribly logical - and so therefore becomes a simplified model since the eventual outcome is already known.
When doing risk assessments, there are 2 main ways of mapping the risks, in one you start from the start, and calculate all of the possible outcomes, the other you take a possible outcome and work back to see what could cause it.
I feel that with problems like the mentioned I can do the latter, but struggle witht he former. WIth the former, there simply are too many possible things to go wrong, and your brain cannot cope. A more NT mind is possibly able to simplfy the model sufficiently before it all occurs to work out the logical things to do, whereas a more AS mind is likely unable to do that, and so must work from the other end.
Having just written that, I see now why I have so many brilliant pieces of hindsight... and people say its bad to look to the past?!?
Thank you for your response. Ah yes, when I am the observer, when I am the one in charge and the problem is in no way, shape or form having to do with me (unless it is a subject I am assured of) I can do both. I automatically see all the posibilities and see all of the outcomes which could occur from them, from there I filter through them until the only a few are left in which can be displayed to the persons involved and they may decide their route or I choose and apply the most fitting.
However when an extreme feeler is involved my logic means butt f**k nothing and I am left to tackle her feelings with my useless wad of s**t all.
The simple thing would be to not respond but if I didn't respond at all she would figure I am more of an as*hole than I already come off as, I don't give a damn about her, ect ect as she's already done this. Silence makes things worse and so does my logic and pointing out the obvious.
When situations better we've both agreed that living on our own would be best as, yes we are roommates and have known each other for a while but yes. Much difficulties.
Its that, "feelers just want to hear something comforting" that always gets me. I can not do it and I do not think that way. I have to FORCE myself and its SO hard and I rarely even think of it.
Why say, "oh I'm sorry?" that sounds cheap and is a rather useless statement.
If I got all OMG SOMETHING IS GOING TO HAPPEN TO ME and panicked I would like someone to say, "shut the hell up, you're being irrational. Stop and think this through."
Have you tried to stock up on phrases along the lines of "Everything will be OK" and "Just don't worry about it"
I find people like to unload on me with emotional stuff, since I possibly don't react too much to it, and think rationally about it - are you sure she even wants you to react as you think she does.
I don't think I've been around many feelers though, so I wouldn't rely too much on me...
I find people like to unload on me with emotional stuff, since I possibly don't react too much to it, and think rationally about it - are you sure she even wants you to react as you think she does.
I don't think I've been around many feelers though, so I wouldn't rely too much on me...
I'm positive.
There is a difference between an emotional thinker and an emotional feeler.
I know a few people online that come to me when they are an emotional wreck because I am an analyst and will bring them back down to rational logical ground.
When she is upset she wants emotional harmony, comforting, compassion and could care less about thinking. To her, how something makes someone feels is much more important than the truth. This in itself makes me panic and usually aggravates me. I DO NOT understand this at all, even if I know this is what she wants I cannot make myself do it.
She fits INFP/INFJ obscenely so.
some people are so emotional about everthing you could call them drama queens. it's a form of egotism too. i have neighbours like that. i've had to tell them i don't want them telling me all their problems. so far it's working but if you let people, they'll be unloading all their problems and worries on you all the time, it's tedious.
aspies seem to attract that sort of thing, i've had complete strangers wanting to take up hours of my time telling me their worries and woes, ugh.
the skin cancer thing sounds like a bid for sympathy, sure. my sister had a small skin cancer on the side of her nose, there's a cream you rub on, i don't think she's had any further problems. some skin cancers aren't too bad. in my sister's case, she's always talking about illness, it's a 'lets talk about me' thing, an ego thing.
aspies egocentrity can be annoying yeah, i have to keep mine on a short leash, but nt egocentrcity is just as bad but it's presented in a more socially acceptable form. they're cleverer about it than we are. genuinely humble people, whether AS or NT are in short supply. i think my egocentricity is a problem and it's a personal goal of mine to try and acquire humility, that way i figure i can't be offending too many people.
here's an interesting quote from another thread here:
sympathy was something i almost never experienced from nt's, so it's hard for me to give it, since i never received it. i think i got a bit of pity, but no sympathy. i don't think there is much sympathy between nt's and AS people, that's part of the difference.
dunno if i helped any. not sure i can.
I recognize what you have described. This gap can't be bridged, other than by acknowledging each other's different manners of functioning. There is no failure in absence of sameness. The situation is that she's afraid she might have skin cancer, and she focuses on "afraid" (the feeling) while you focus on "might have skin cancer" (the cause of the feeling). Then you try battling her emotions with your logic. I would be much inclined to do the same, because my logic doesn't appear to me as particularly mine. It appears inherent to the world, and equally to all that exists in it. This is an illusion though - we each have different information, and even if we have the same information we will see different relationships between the various data, we won't have the same stakes in them, we won't find the same things interesting about them and we won't fully agree which data are the most essential/fundamental. In short, all minds live in the same world, but because of different systemizing no two minds are conscious of the same world. Now, knowing that the most immediately noticeable reality for your roommate is how she feels, this is what must be dealt with. You can't resolve the situation based on your personal experience, because the way you feel is never the most immediately noticeable reality for you. You can know though, from previous observations, that "feelers" like your roommate resolve intense feelings by talking about them. I think the way that works is that talking about the feeling, in her imagination, expands the feeling over a greater volume (namely your & her mind combined, instead of hers alone), and thus reduces its intensity. So the best way to help her is to ask her to describe the feeling, then ask her more questions about things she's saying, and so on, until she appears relieved. You need not do much talking.
This phenomenon will always be a source of aggravation for us, though. In an English class I did some time ago, we read an essay about a black man (the author) who was walking on a mostly deserted street, and when he came close to a white woman, about to walk past her, she ran away. He interpreted this as the woman being afraid of him because he was black. I pointed out in the class that we could not tell whether his assumption was correct, because all the author was telling us about the woman was that she ran away. No one agreed with me! Instead they decided that it was irrelevant whether the woman's running away was actually racially motivated, all that mattered was how it made the author feel. They did not see any difference at all between feeling discriminated against and being discriminated against. Such is their reality, and we must consider this if we are to make sense to them.
_________________
There is nothing that is uniquely and invariably human.
I have this same problem and my husband has been trying to point it out, "it's not all about yoooooou!"
The best solution is to throw back a question, "how do you feel about that?" and if she has already told you, just agree. Because really, there's nothing to argue over, if she is explaining her feelings. It feels dishonest, yes. But that's because our perspective of the discussion [why someone would bring up cancer in casual conversation] is different than their perspective [I'm sharing a thought in my head and want some feedback, consolation, support].
Emotional people need really sympathetic people around them. The problem with that is that support system can wear down. I had a friend that could rely on me "to be there" when she was upset. I didn't gush, hug or say anything appropriate. But I was there to lessen the loneliness, to entertain family members or let her vent. She had other friends to hug, help, send cards, etc but they weren't always available to her.
So, if your roommate shares with you, she needs that. Don't try to help and don't try to second guess. Just keep a stockpile of "sympathetic" phrases and "how do you feel about it?". She may really subconciously want someone to be flat and less reactive.
Thank you everyone who posted here
William, your analysis is great, thank you for this.
Brought me back to ground.
SeriousGirl
Veteran
Joined: 17 Mar 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,067
Location: the Witness Protection Program
I find that when someone is confiding a fear the best thing to do is echo what they say back to them and then wait to see if they agree with what you said. If they don't further clarify it, then you say something to the effect that you understand how they feel and that you will be there for them.
This is standard marriage counseling 101, but it will work in any situation. If you do this, you will NEVER again have this problem.
_________________
If the topic is small, why talk about it?
sinsboldly
Veteran
Joined: 21 Nov 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,488
Location: Bandon-by-the-Sea, Oregon
The emotions aren't something to be battled, they're something to be channeled... both to help the person and to gather data for your own ends.
Next time someone comes to you with "I think I have skin cancer.", try this. First, don't get all wound up over your health... you're not the one with the strange mole that's growing on your arm, or whatnot. She's the one who has some spot that's acting weird, so stop obsessing over yourself. Be there for her emotionally while gathering her data. What sort of a logical, scientific person doesn't gather data when the opportunity presents itself, anyway?
In the following, the typical reactions to what you're doing and saying and the practical applications thereof are in brackets.
"Oh my god, are you serious?" (emotional validation, reinforcement that you care, helps her open up to you about the problem so that you may gather data)
"Where? What does it look like?" (makes it obvious you want to help her + aids in data collection)
*drag out biological and medical books* (You're going to the trouble to drag out the references. This is reassuring, and provides further emotional reinforcement that you do indeed give a damn. When you're gathering data, this greases the chute if you will. When people think you don't give a damn, they tend to either clam up or get pissed off. Neither is conducive to gathering your data.)
*looks at spot* "Has it been growing? How long have you had it?" (makes it obvious you want to help her + aids in data collection)
*compare spot to books* (helps categorize problematic spot, and again reinforces that you give a damn because you're putting forth obvious effort)
*discuss with her which one it might be* (helps gather further data, plus is emotionally comforting for her)
*ask if any relatives of hers have had any strange spots (benign or otherwise) or problems with cancer, and if so which ones and what kinds?* (data collection)
*give your opinion of what it might be, but admit you could easily be wrong* (reassurance)
*reassure that as small as the spot is, the doctor should be able to remove it* (reassurance)
*encourage her to go to a doctor pronto* (this is just basic ethics. people with a potentially life-threatening medical problem need to be encouraged to get help for it. It also reinforces the notion that you care about her, thereby aiding in further data collection.)
If she wants to talk about her fear of death, any other people she knows who have had strange spots or cancer, etc. give her your full attention. (She's probably going through some mortality-related issues right now, and the psychological data on such things is fascinating anyhow.)
*when she goes to the doctor later, make it a point to ask how it all went* (satisfies your intellectual curiousity as to whether or not your idea was correct, and also reinforces the notion that you give a damn about her, making her even more apt to come to you with her data in the future.)
Next time someone comes to you with "I think I have skin cancer.", try this. First, don't get all wound up over your health... you're not the one with the strange mole that's growing on your arm, or whatnot. She's the one who has some spot that's acting weird, so stop obsessing over yourself. Be there for her emotionally while gathering her data. What sort of a logical, scientific person doesn't gather data when the opportunity presents itself, anyway?
In the following, the typical reactions to what you're doing and saying and the practical applications thereof are in brackets.
"Oh my god, are you serious?" (emotional validation, reinforcement that you care, helps her open up to you about the problem so that you may gather data)
"Where? What does it look like?" (makes it obvious you want to help her + aids in data collection)
*drag out biological and medical books* (You're going to the trouble to drag out the references. This is reassuring, and provides further emotional reinforcement that you do indeed give a damn. When you're gathering data, this greases the chute if you will. When people think you don't give a damn, they tend to either clam up or get pissed off. Neither is conducive to gathering your data.)
*looks at spot* "Has it been growing? How long have you had it?" (makes it obvious you want to help her + aids in data collection)
*compare spot to books* (helps categorize problematic spot, and again reinforces that you give a damn because you're putting forth obvious effort)
*discuss with her which one it might be* (helps gather further data, plus is emotionally comforting for her)
*ask if any relatives of hers have had any strange spots (benign or otherwise) or problems with cancer, and if so which ones and what kinds?* (data collection)
*give your opinion of what it might be, but admit you could easily be wrong* (reassurance)
*reassure that as small as the spot is, the doctor should be able to remove it* (reassurance)
*encourage her to go to a doctor pronto* (this is just basic ethics. people with a potentially life-threatening medical problem need to be encouraged to get help for it. It also reinforces the notion that you care about her, thereby aiding in further data collection.)
If she wants to talk about her fear of death, any other people she knows who have had strange spots or cancer, etc. give her your full attention. (She's probably going through some mortality-related issues right now, and the psychological data on such things is fascinating anyhow.)
*when she goes to the doctor later, make it a point to ask how it all went* (satisfies your intellectual curiousity as to whether or not your idea was correct, and also reinforces the notion that you give a damn about her, making her even more apt to come to you with her data in the future.)
Now if I could do this without a panic attack that would be GREAT.
I do, really need to find ways to open up.
Could I have done all this? Yes but the immediate future I am HORRIBLE at detecting and I'm SO bad at speaking the process of analysis out loud, a MAJOR flaw.
hm, unfortunate.
I need to practice this.
Thank you.
I was planning on this. Its hard for people I have history with because of that emotional foundation that I'm so very unaware of. I can help someone I don't know or have absolutely no connection to and I can help someone who is a fellow thinker but someone who I a) know relatively well and connect with on some levels and b) is definitely a feeler I really have to watch my mouth.
As I learn visually we've already gathered it is a small spot and will be able to be treated easily, its also possible that she may not have it. If she comes back from the doctor of comes to me again with worries and or troubles because she doesn't have an appointment until July I will work on my extroversion.
sinsboldly
Veteran
Joined: 21 Nov 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,488
Location: Bandon-by-the-Sea, Oregon
WARNING!
all this expenditure of energy will stimulate a connection between her and you, and she will exhibit a strong connection towards you. This is called bonding. She can't help it any more than you can help being how you are. You might also have a latent residue of it too. Remember it will be stronger in her than it is in you, so don't forget later when YOU find yourself in a pickle, SHE will respond with concern and solicitation.
Try not to resent it, ok? She is just being reciprocal.
Merle
all this expenditure of energy will stimulate a connection between her and you, and she will exhibit a strong connection towards you. This is called bonding. She can't help it any more than you can help being how you are. You might also have a latent residue of it too. Remember it will be stronger in her than it is in you, so don't forget later when YOU find yourself in a pickle, SHE will respond with concern and solicitation.
Try not to resent it, ok? She is just being reciprocal.
Merle
Good advice, yes when I went into panic after realizing that I furthered trouble rather than alleived it she responded immediately with concern. I felt quite pathetic but accepted it.
Thanks everyone for your responses.