LeKiwi, your interesting redefinition of the word "cure" has come up before. For your reference, from Webster's Unabridged:
Quote:
Cure
Cure\, v. t. [imp. & p. p. Cured (k?rd); p. pr. & vb. n. Curing.] [OF. curer to take care, to heal, F., only, to cleanse, L. curare to take care, to heal, fr. cura. See Cure,.]
1. To heal; to restore to health, soundness, or sanity; to make well; -- said of a patient.
The child was cured from that very hour. --Matt. xvii. 18.
2. To subdue or remove by remedial means; to remedy; to remove; to heal; -- said of a malady.
To cure this deadly grief. --Shak.
Then he called his twelve disciples together, and gave them power . . . to cure diseases. --Luke ix. 1.
3. To set free from (something injurious or blameworthy), as from a bad habit.
I never knew any man cured of inattention. --Swift.
What you mean is a palliative. Referring to something that merely lessens symptoms as a "cure" is akin to claiming that a good shot of morphine will "cure" advanced cancer, because the patient is no longer in debilitating pain.
If we could all agree on a common language, and not go redefining terms used by others, it might go a long way toward helping this discussion reach some kind of conclusion...
I understand that and I agree, I'm just saying you need to be careful when you hear people (especially non-Aspergians) throwing the word 'cure' around, like 'my child was cured' etc. The majority of the time they don't mean an actual cure, they mean the symptoms were lessened if not eradicated altogether, but the autism is probably still there as it can't really be 'cured' as such (not yet, at least, if ever).