Page 6 of 7 [ 104 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Marcia
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2008
Age: 56
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,148

04 Feb 2012, 4:56 pm

antimuda wrote:
Marcia
Quote:
My optician doesn't test my eyes while I am wearing my glasses
.

I would hope that your ophthalmologist/ optometrist (optician is someone who makes and dispenses eyeglasses) would test your vision both with and without corrective lenses. The purpose of the examination with glasses would be to confirm that the proper optics have been prescribed enabling your eyes to function in the normal ~20/~20 range. If your vision impairment is unable to be corrected, I would agree that it constitutes a limit.

Based upon your examples and discussion, I am struggling to understand how you are differentiate the term "impair" from "limit". What do you see as the difference?


In my reading last week I came across a reference to the World Health Organisation's ICF model which expresses clearly what I was struggling to put into words. This is the passage I read...

The World Health Organisation’s International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)* is a model which “states that any given health condition can be expressed at three different levels: impairment, activity limitation and participation restriction. The meanings of these terms are summarised in (the) table (below).

The WHO-ICF model
Level of description Meaning Focus on

Impairment Problem with structure or function of an organ or body system Body
Activity limitation Problem with carrying out meaningful activities of daily life Behaviour
Participation restriction Problem with involvement in life situations – social roles and relationships Social world

According to the model, problems at any of these levels occur in, and are affected by, personal, physical and social contextual factors.

To illustrate, the health condition ‘multiple sclerosis’ may be expressed for an affected individual at the level of impairment as degeneration of the fatty material that surrounds the nerves (problem with body structure) and as weakness and incoordination (problem with body function). It may be expressed at the level of activity limitation as a severe difficulty in walking for any distance outside the home. It may be expressed at the level of participation restriction as a reduction in employability, with all its associated social disadvantages. Personal contextual factors would include the previous illness experience and beliefs of the individual; physical contextual factors would include the location and layout of her home; social contextual factors would include the attitudes of family, friends and potential employers.

A single health condition can be described simultaneously using any combination of the three levels, and all levels are equally important. Despite what one might think, there is no simple proportional relationship between the different levels of description; a high level of impairment doesn’t necessarily imply a high level of activity limitation and participation restriction. This is because individuals vary, health conditions vary and cultures vary.”**

* World Health Organisation (2002) Towards a Common Language for Functioning, Disability and Health ICF, Geneva World Health Organization

** Joannan Collicutt McGrath (2009) Jesus and the Gospel Women London SPCK


I can't get the table to copy properly. The three column headings are in italics.

I also found this on the WHO website: http://www.who.int/topics/disabilities/en/

"Disabilities is an umbrella term, covering impairments, activity limitations, and participation restrictions. An impairment is a problem in body function or structure; an activity limitation is a difficulty encountered by an individual in executing a task or action; while a participation restriction is a problem experienced by an individual in involvement in life situations.

Thus disability is a complex phenomenon, reflecting an interaction between features of a person’s body and features of the society in which he or she lives."

It seems to me that the references to "impair and limit" are in line with the WHO ICF understanding of disablity.



antimuda
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2011
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 45

07 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm

Marcia-
My contention all along has been the term limit and impair have different meanings. If we look the defintions provided directly by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/902cm.html)

Quote:
(b) Regulatory Definition -- A physical or mental impairment means

(1) [a]ny physiological disorder, or condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss affecting one or more of the following body systems: neurological, musculoskeletal, special sense organs, respiratory (including speech organs), cardiovascular, reproductive, digestive, genito-urinary, hemic and lymphatic, skin, and endocrine; or

(2) [a]ny mental or psychological disorder, such as mental retardation, organic brain syndrome, emotional or mental illness, and specific learning disabilities.



Quote:
(1) The term "substantially limits" means:

(i) Unable to perform a major life activity that the average person in the general population can perform; or

(ii) Significantly restricted as to the condition, manner or duration under which an individual can perform a particular major life activity as compared to the condition, manner, or duration under which the average person in the general population can perform that same major life activity.

(2) The following factors should be considered in determining whether an individual is substantially limited in a major life activity:

(i) The nature and severity of the impairment;

(ii) The duration or expected duration of the impairment; and

(iii) The permanent or long term impact, or the expected permanent or long term impact of or resulting from the impairment.


In the DSM-V criteria the term "limit" was introduced. This now establishes a higher standard then was present under the DSM-IV or is present in the ICD-10. However the new definition is in line with the legal definition of a disability as defined by the ADA



antimuda
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2011
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 45

07 Feb 2012, 1:47 pm

btbnnyr-

Quote:
Criterion C: Adults who meet the criteria for Asperger's Syndrome or ASD in adulthood without having a childhood developmental history consistent with an autism spectrum disorder, aka autism, are not autistic and therefore cannot possibly have Asperger's Syndrome or ASD and should not be diagnosed with Asperger's Syndrome or ASD. Autistic traits must be present in early childhood. I agree with that. Otherwise, the person is not autistic and developed social problems and RRB later for any number of reasons. The only exception is childhood disintegrative disorder, which can onset in late childhood, but this disorder is rare and involves its own easily identifiable developmental course and high severity of traits. For an autistic person, it is not at all difficult to identify autistic traits in a retrospective manner. Most likely, the autistic traits had been identified long before the person ever heard of autism, but the big picture of the person being autistic had not been seen due to the lack of knowledge of autism during the time period when the person was a child.


The DSM Committee in their recommendation for the removal of Aspergers said "Early language details are hard to establish in retrospect, especially for older children and adults". For a rather lengthy discussion of the issue see page 5 of this thread. In summary the inclusion of the retroactive observational history is prone to confirmation bias and all of the inherent flaws in self reporting. As a result the criteria does not introduce any additional clarity and introduces additional subjectivity.

What other disorder would characterize criteria A,B and D of the DSM-V?

Quote:
Criterion D: Yes, needing help to up your level of functioning to that of your peers is an impairment. Without help, you would be significantly limited in everyday functioning. e.g. Someone might need a flexible work schedule due to overload/shutdown issues, or otherwise, she cannot work. Without help, she cannot work. If she has no ASD diagnosis, then she gets no accommodations anywhere, so she cannot work. That is limiting. Once you have an ASD diagnosis, you can get accommodations, and you can raise your level of functioning. Clinicians do not operate like if you have help and can work, then you are not limited. One of the first things that my clinician asked me was what accommodations I would need to raise my level of occupational/educational functioning. If I did not need any, then there would have been no need for diagnosis. It turned out that my childhood history and adulthood experiences showed that I did and do need that help, e.g. IEP in grade school and junior high. Otherwise, I cannot function up to any level near my potential. The point of the diagnosis is to have a reason to get the accommodations. Otherwise, no accommodations ---> significant limits in functioning.


The point at issue here is the introduction of the term "limit". I believe the answer was to harmonize the criteria with the ADA requirement for a disability, "a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity.". The DSM-IV criteria was for a "significant impairment" or "qualitative impairment" for Aspergers and ASD respectively. As has been discussed ad nauseum throughout the thread, the terms have different meanings. The term "limit" is a much higher legal standard. Evidence to substantiate this definition has been provided from a dictionary, the Americans with Disabilities Act, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and the World Health Organisation. As a result high functioning individuals who would have been included under the DSM-IV criteria, a consequently have an impairment, but that impairment does not limit their daily functioning will not meet the DSM V diagnostic criteria.



antimuda
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2011
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 45

07 Feb 2012, 2:02 pm

SUTTON et al. v. UNITED AIR LINES, INC

Quote:
A “disability” exists only where an impairment “substantially limits” a major life activity, not where it “might,” “could,” or “would” be substantially limiting if corrective measures were not taken.
. http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/97-1943.ZS.html

Further proof that having an impairment does not necessarily constitute having a limit



aghogday
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,836

07 Feb 2012, 8:48 pm

antimuda wrote:
SUTTON et al. v. UNITED AIR LINES, INC
Quote:
A “disability” exists only where an impairment “substantially limits” a major life activity, not where it “might,” “could,” or “would” be substantially limiting if corrective measures were not taken.
. http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/97-1943.ZS.html

Further proof that having an impairment does not necessarily constitute having a limit


It's too bad that an MRI can't reliably show the neurological differences that limit brain function of an autistic individual; then a diagnosis would not be as subjective as it is.

The ADA considers autism at the core a condition that limits the major biological functioning aspect of life, of brain function. The limitations of brain function though, must be diagnosed through behavior. Even though neither the phrases, impair, or limit and impair an important area of life functioning are used in the DSMIV definition of Autism Disorder, the existing criteria is still considered by the ADA as evidence of limited brain function.

The DSM5 has made it clear on their website that their intention was to design the criteria in a way where virtually all existing Aspergers diagnoses would meet the new criteria.

With that guidance there won't likely be any compelling reason for professional to summon a patient in for re-diagnosis of Aspergres.

As for new individuals, it's a new ball game; different wording, now with severity levels. It always ends up in part as a subjective judgement of the diagnosing professional, so it's hard to say if it will be more inclusive or exclusive.

For the diagnosing professional they already understand the condition of Aspergers as one that significantly limits individuals in daily life functioning. The disorder in neurological functioning is a gimme on that part.

I doubt the change of the wording to from impair, to impair and limits is going to make much difference in an actual new diagnosis for Aspergers, but subjective judgement is involved so there is that possibility.

The severity levels though are discrete levels of severity that provide details on the impairments/limitations that are required at each level. That could make a difference in new diagnoses if one does not have the impairments/limits of the first level. For instance if someone with RRB's, can control those behaviors well enough where they don't affect other daily requirements in life.

It's not likely that many, though, seek a diagnosis, in the first place, unless they are limited in daily functioning.

PDD NOS is a whole different story, there will be those excluded from existing ASD diagnoses in some cases, and in new diagnoses as well, potentially moved over to the new SCD category. Although it's not likely that there is going to be any specific requirement for all individuals with PDD NOS to get re-diagnosed..

Psychiatrists don't work for free, so it's not likely that psychiatrists in unison are going to summon patients with PDD NOS to come in to pay for a re-diagnosis, until some type of documentation of rediagnosis to the new criteria is required by the patient for disability benefits, special ed programs, etc.

I doubt the DSMV is going to change Criteria D, between now and the final revision, for concern that people will lose their current diagnosis, because of the word limit.

I haven't come across any of their representatives expressing concern over the addition of that word in criteria D.

Whereas, other issues have been brought up by DSMV representatives, such as the requirement for RRB's in PDD NOS, and the change to the wording to include those whose symptoms don't become fully evident until later in youth as the demands of life change.



Dillogic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Nov 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,339

08 Feb 2012, 12:16 am

In the DSM-IV-TR, it says that "Asperger's is quite disabling" [due to the social deficits and repetitive behaviors]. It's in the expanded text that explains the criteria in-depth.

Something people seem to overlook (the expanded text that is, which is just as important as the criteria, as it explains it).



antimuda
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2011
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 45

08 Feb 2012, 11:45 am

Dillogic-

Very interesting. I did not think there was more commentary listed as I had never seen it reference. I luckily was able to access the full text of the APA, since I could not find the commentary anywhere else online. Here is the complete listing for Aspergers

Quote:
299.80 Asperger's Disorder
Diagnostic criteria for 299.80 Asperger's Disorder
Qualitative impairment in social interaction, as manifested by at least two of the following:

marked impairment in the use of multiple nonverbal behaviors such as eye-to-eye gaze, facial expression, body postures, and gestures to regulate social interaction

failure to develop peer relationships appropriate to developmental level

a lack of spontaneous seeking to share enjoyment, interests, or achievements with other people (e.g., by a lack of showing, bringing, or pointing out objects of interest to other people)

lack of social or emotional reciprocity

Restricted repetitive and stereotyped patterns of behavior, interests, and activities, as manifested by at least one of the following:

encompassing preoccupation with one or more stereotyped and restricted patterns of interest that is abnormal either in intensity or focus

apparently inflexible adherence to specific, nonfunctional routines or rituals

stereotyped and repetitive motor mannerisms (e.g., hand or finger flapping or twisting, or complex whole-body movements)

persistent preoccupation with parts of objects

The disturbance causes clinically significant impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.

There is no clinically significant general delay in language (e.g., single words used by age 2 years, communicative phrases used by age 3 years).

There is no clinically significant delay in cognitive development or in the development of age-appropriate self-help skills, adaptive behavior (other than in social interaction), and curiosity about the environment in childhood.

Criteria are not met for another specific Pervasive Developmental Disorder or Schizophrenia.

Diagnostic Features
The essential features of Asperger's Disorder are severe and sustained impairment in social interaction (Criterion A) and the development of restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests, and activities (Criterion B). The disturbance must cause clinically significant impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning (Criterion C). In contrast to Autistic Disorder, there are no clinically significant delays or deviance in language acquisition (e.g., single non-echoed words are used communicatively by age 2 years, and spontaneous communicative phrases are used by age 3 years) (Criterion D), although more subtle aspects of social communication (e.g., typical give-and-take in conversation) may be affected. In addition, during the first 3 years of life, there are no clinically significant delays in cognitive development as manifested by expressing normal curiosity about the environment or in the acquisition of age-appropriate learning skills and adaptive behaviors (other than in social interaction) (Criterion E). Finally, the criteria are not met for another specific Pervasive Developmental Disorder or for Schizophrenia (Criterion F). This condition is also termed Asperger's syndrome.
The impairment in reciprocal social interaction is gross and sustained. There may be marked impairment in the use of multiple nonverbal behaviors (e.g., eye-to-eye gaze, facial expression, body postures and gestures) to regulate social interaction and communication (Criterion A1). There may be failure to develop peer relationships appropriate to developmental level (Criterion A2) that may take different forms at different ages. Younger individuals may have little or no interest in establishing friendships. Older individuals may have an interest in friendship but lack understanding of the conventions of social interaction. There may be a lack of spontaneous seeking to share enjoyment, interests, or achievements with other people (e.g., not showing, bringing, or pointing out objects they find interesting) (Criterion A3). Lack of social or emotional reciprocity may be present (e.g., not actively participating in simple social play or games, preferring solitary activities, or involving others in activities only as tools or "mechanical" aids) (Criterion A4). Although the social deficit in Asperger's Disorder is severe and is defined in the same way as in Autistic Disorder, the lack of social reciprocity is more typically manifest by an eccentric and one-sided social approach to others (e.g., pursuing a conversational topic regardless of others' reactions) rather than social and emotional indifference.
As in Autistic Disorder, restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests, and activities are present (Criterion B). Often these are primarily manifest in the development of encompassing preoccupations about a circumscribed topic or interest, about which the individual can amass a great deal of facts and information (Criterion B1). These interests and activities are pursued with great intensity often to the exclusion of other activities.
The disturbance must cause clinically significant impairment in social adaptation, which in turn may have a significant impact on self-suffiency or on occupational or other important areas of functioning (Criterion C). The social deficits and restricted patterns of interests, activities, and behavior are the source of considerable disability.
In contrast to Autistic Disorder, there are no clinically significant delays in early language (e.g., single words are used by age 2, communicative phrases are used by age 3) (Criterion D). Subsequent language may be unusual in terms of the individual's preoccupation with certain topics and his or her verbosity. Difficulties in communication may result from social dysfunction and the failure to appreciate and utilize conventional rules of conversation, failure to appreciate nonverbal cues, and limited capacities for self-monitoring.
Individuals with Asperger's Disorder do not have clinically significant delays in cognitive development or in age-appropriate self-help skills, adaptive behavior (other than in social interaction), and curiosity about the environment in childhood (Criterion E). Because early language and cognitive skills are within normal limits in the first 3 years of life, parents or caregivers are not usually concerned about the child's development during that time, although upon detailed interviewing they may recall unusual behaviors. The child may be described as talking before walking, and indeed parents may believe the child to be precocious (e.g., with a rich or "adult" vocabulary). Although subtle social problems may exist, parents or caregivers often are not concerned until the child begins to attend a preschool or is exposed to same-age children; at this point the child's social difficulties with same-age peers may become apparent.
By definition the diagnosis is not given if the criteria are met for any other specific Pervasive Developmental Disorder or for Schizophrenia (although the diagnoses of Asperger's Disorder and Schizophrenia may coexist if the onset of the Asperger's Disorder clearly preceded the onset of Schizophrenia) (Criterion F).
Associated Features and Disorders
In contrast to Autistic Disorder, Mental Retardation is not usually observed in Asperger's Disorder, although occasional cases in which Mild Mental Retardation is present have been noted (e.g., when the Mental Retardation becomes apparent only in the school years, with no apparent cognitive or language delay in the first years of life). Variability of cognitive functioning may be observed, often with strengths in areas of verbal ability (e.g., vocabulary, rote auditory memory) and weaknesses in nonverbal areas (e.g., visual-motor and visual-spatial skills). Motor clumsiness and awkwardness may be present but usually are relatively mild, although motor difficulties may contribute to peer rejection and social isolation (e.g., inability to participate in group sports). Symptoms of overactivity and inattention are frequent in Asperger's Disorder, and indeed many individuals with this condition receive a diagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder prior to the diagnosis of Asperger's Disorder. Asperger's Disorder has been reported to be associated with a number of other mental disorders, including Depressive Disorders.
Specific Age and Gender Features
The clinical picture may present differently at different ages. Often the social disability of individuals with the disorder becomes more striking over time. By adolescence some individuals with the disorder may learn to use areas of strength (e.g., rote verbal abilities) to compensate for areas of weakness. Individuals with Asperger's Disorder may experience victimization by others; this, and feelings of social isolation and an increasing capacity for self-awareness, may contribute to the development of depression and anxiety in adolescence and young adulthood. The disorder is diagnosed much more frequently (at least five times) in males than in females.
Prevalence
Definitive data regarding the prevalence of Asperger's Disorder are lacking.
Course
Asperger's Disorder is a continuous and lifelong disorder. In school-age children, good verbal abilities may, to some extent, mask the severity of the child's social dysfunction and may also mislead caregivers and teachers—that is, caregivers and teachers may focus on the child's good verbal skills but be insufficiently aware of problems in other areas (particularly social adjustment). The child's relatively good verbal skills may also lead teachers and caregivers to erroneously attribute behavioral difficulties to willfulness or stubbornness in the child. Interest in forming social relationships may increase in adolescence as the individuals learn some ways of responding more adaptively to their difficulties—for example, the individual may learn to apply explicit verbal rules or routines in certain stressful situations. Older individuals may have an interest in friendship but lack understanding of the conventions of social interaction and may more likely make relationships with individuals much older or younger than themselves. The prognosis appears significantly better than in Autistic Disorder, as follow-up studies suggest that, as adults, many individuals are capable of gainful employment and personal self-sufficiency.
Familial Pattern
Although the available data are limited, there appears to be an increased frequency of Asperger's Disorder among family members of individuals who have the disorder. There may also be an increased risk for Autistic Disorder as well as more general social difficulties.
Differential Diagnosis
Asperger's Disorder must be distinguished from the other Pervasive Developmental Disorders, all of which are characterized by problems in social interaction. It differs from Autistic Disorder in several ways. In Autistic Disorder there are, by definition, significant abnormalities in the areas of social interaction, language, and play, whereas in Asperger's Disorder early cognitive and language skills are not delayed significantly. Furthermore, in Autistic Disorder, restricted, repetitive, and stereotyped interests and activities are often characterized by the presence of motor mannerisms, preoccupation with parts of objects, rituals, and marked distress in change, whereas in Asperger's Disorder these are primarily observed in the all-encompassing pursuit of a circumscribed interest involving a topic to which the individual devotes inordinate amounts of time amassing information and facts. Differentiation of the two conditions can be problematic in some cases. In Autistic Disorder, typical social interaction patterns are marked by self-isolation or markedly rigid social approaches, whereas in Asperger's Disorder there may appear to be motivation for approaching others even though this is then done in a highly eccentric, one-sided, verbose, and insensitive manner.
Asperger's Disorder must also be differentiated from Pervasive Developmental Disorders other than Autistic Disorder. Rett's Disorder differs from Asperger's Disorder in its characteristic sex ratio and pattern of deficits. Rett's Disorder has been diagnosed only in females, whereas Asperger's Disorder occurs much more frequently in males. In Rett's Disorder, there is a characteristic pattern of head growth deceleration, loss of previously acquired purposeful hand skills, and the appearance of poorly coordinated gait or trunk movements. Rett's Disorder is also associated with marked degrees of Mental Retardation and gross impairments in language and communication.
Asperger's Disorder differs from Childhood Disintegrative Disorder, which has a distinctive pattern of developmental regression following at least 2 years of normal development. Children with Childhood Disintegrative Disorder also display marked degrees of Mental Retardation and language impairment. In contrast, in Asperger's Disorder there is no pattern of developmental regression and, by definition, no significant cognitive or language delays.
Schizophrenia of childhood onset usually develops after years of normal, or near normal, development, and characteristic features of the disorder, including hallucinations, delusions, and disorganized speech, are present. In Selective Mutism, the child usually exhibits appropriate communication skills in certain contexts and does not have the severe impairment in social interaction and the restricted patterns of behavior associated with Asperger's Disorder. Conversely, individuals with Asperger's Disorder are typically verbose. In Expressive Language Disorder and Mixed Receptive-Expressive Language Disorder, there is language impairment but no associated qualitative impairment in social interaction and restricted, repetitive, and stereotyped patterns of behavior. Some individuals with Asperger's Disorder may exhibit behavioral patterns suggesting Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, although special clinical attention should be given to the differentiation between preoccupations and activities in Asperger's Disorder and obsessions and compulsions in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. In Asperger's Disorder these interests are the source of some apparent pleasure or comfort, whereas in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder they are the source of anxiety. Furthermore, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder is typically not associated with the level of impairment in social interaction and social communication seen in Asperger's Disorder.
The relationship between Asperger's Disorder and Schizoid Personality Disorder is unclear. In general, the social difficulties in Asperger's Disorder are more severe and of earlier onset. Although some individuals with Asperger's Disorder may experience heightened and debilitating anxiety in social settings as in Social Phobia or other Anxiety Disorders, the latter conditions are not characterized by pervasive impairments in social development or by the circumscribed interests typical of Asperger's Disorder. Asperger's Disorder must be distinguished from normal social awkwardness and normal age-appropriate interests and hobbies. In Asperger's Disorder, the social deficits are quite severe and the preoccupations are all-encompassing and interfere with the acquisition of basic skills.



antimuda
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2011
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 45

08 Feb 2012, 1:28 pm

Dillogic-

I can not find your quote in the complete DSM-IV-IR nor in the supporting cases. Where is the quote extracted from?



aghogday
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,836

08 Feb 2012, 5:16 pm

antimuda wrote:
Dillogic-

I can not find your quote in the complete DSM-IV-IR nor in the supporting cases. Where is the quote extracted from?


Unless you own the DSM IV TR manual, it cost $49 for 24 hour access, to get online access to see the full text from the manual, as far as I know, on the APA site.

Here is a site where someone pasted the information from the manual. I found it on other sources as well by doing a google search on the specific statement about disability the same text that you provided.

Where did you find it on the APA site for free; or do you have a subscription?

http://sites.google.com/site/gavinbollard/about-aspergers/dsm-iv-criteria-for-aspergers



antimuda
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2011
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 45

09 Feb 2012, 8:46 am

aghogday-

Quote:
I doubt the DSMV is going to change Criteria D, between now and the final revision, for concern that people will lose their current diagnosis, because of the word limit.

I haven't come across any of their representatives expressing concern over the addition of that word in criteria D.

Whereas, other issues have been brought up by DSMV representatives, such as the requirement for RRB's in PDD NOS, and the change to the wording to include those whose symptoms don't become fully evident until later in youth as the demands of life change.


The point of this thread was to discuss two aspects of the DSM-V which have been changed which are not being discussed. I likewise have seen countless discussions on the changes to A & B but no discussion on D. From a cursory review of the associated case law the inclusion of the term limit does dramatically increase the requirement. I don't know what impact it will have in a clinical diagnostic setting however I would have liked to have seen a rationale provide by the DSM Committee for the change in language.

The best explanation I am able to derive is that the committee was attempting to harmonize the criteria to meet the ADA requirements of a disability. If this is correct then it would in fact raise the bar and would exclude individuals as the impairment in its corrected form still must be limiting.

Quote:
Where did you find it on the APA site for free; or do you have a subscription?

I cheated and accessed the DSM through a University Library account. The cases section of the DSM is actually quite interesting and there is a 'typical' example under the heading of "Time Traveler". (PM me if you want to read the case and I will email it to you) However search as I might I could not find the phrase used by Dillogic, "Asperger's is quite disabling"

Finally in regard to criteria C. I still have yet to uncover a condition that would cover DSM V Criteria A, B and D. Asperger's /ASD is a life long condition with many initial diagnosis made on adults. Why can there not exist criteria for when the evaluation is performed on a child/ adolescent which includes the childhood requirements and another discrete set of a based upon present behaviors when the diagnosis is being performed upon an adult?



Tuttle
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,088
Location: Massachusetts

09 Feb 2012, 12:59 pm

antimuda wrote:
Finally in regard to criteria C. I still have yet to uncover a condition that would cover DSM V Criteria A, B and D. Asperger's /ASD is a life long condition with many initial diagnosis made on adults. Why can there not exist criteria for when the evaluation is performed on a child/ adolescent which includes the childhood requirements and another discrete set of a based upon present behaviors when the diagnosis is being performed upon an adult?


I have seen people get close to meeting A,B, and D with developed anxiety (both generalized and social) and depression from bullying and other abuse.


As for the argument about "limit", note that the definition of disability requires "substantially limits" not just "limits". "Limits and impairs" is not enough to consider someone disabled if the 'limit' isn't significant enough. There still can exist cases of ASDs that are not disabilities (but are disorders that limit and impair us). And still for many of us they are disabilities.



antimuda
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2011
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 45

09 Feb 2012, 2:57 pm

Tuttle-
DSM- V

Quote:
D. Symptoms together limit and impair everyday functioning.


ADA Definition of a disablity
Quote:
a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities of such individual


Where "substantially limits" is defined as
Quote:
Unable to perform a major life activity that the average person in the general population can perform


and "major life activity" is defined as

Quote:
to mean "functions such as caring for oneself, performing manual tasks, walking, seeing, hearing, speaking, breathing, learning, and working.


Re-Writing the ADA Definition of disability to include the definition of substantially limits and major life activity we have
a physical or mental impairment that [makes an individual] unable to perform a function such as caring for oneself, performing manual tasks, walking, seeing, hearing, speaking, breathing, learning, and working that the average person in the general population can perform.

So it comes done to whether caring for oneself, performing manual tasks, walking, seeing, hearing, speaking, breathing, learning, and working are daily activities. Which clearly they are. Therefore if one meets the DSM criteria they must also meet the ADA criteria for a disability



aghogday
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,836

09 Feb 2012, 4:40 pm

antimuda wrote:
Dillogic-

Very interesting. I did not think there was more commentary listed as I had never seen it reference. I luckily was able to access the full text of the APA, since I could not find the commentary anywhere else online. Here is the complete listing for Aspergers

Quote:
299.80 Asperger's Disorder
Diagnostic criteria for 299.80 Asperger's Disorder
Qualitative impairment in social interaction, as manifested by at least two of the following:

marked impairment in the use of multiple nonverbal behaviors such as eye-to-eye gaze, facial expression, body postures, and gestures to regulate social interaction

failure to develop peer relationships appropriate to developmental level

a lack of spontaneous seeking to share enjoyment, interests, or achievements with other people (e.g., by a lack of showing, bringing, or pointing out objects of interest to other people)

lack of social or emotional reciprocity

Restricted repetitive and stereotyped patterns of behavior, interests, and activities, as manifested by at least one of the following:

encompassing preoccupation with one or more stereotyped and restricted patterns of interest that is abnormal either in intensity or focus

apparently inflexible adherence to specific, nonfunctional routines or rituals

stereotyped and repetitive motor mannerisms (e.g., hand or finger flapping or twisting, or complex whole-body movements)

persistent preoccupation with parts of objects

The disturbance causes clinically significant impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.

There is no clinically significant general delay in language (e.g., single words used by age 2 years, communicative phrases used by age 3 years).

There is no clinically significant delay in cognitive development or in the development of age-appropriate self-help skills, adaptive behavior (other than in social interaction), and curiosity about the environment in childhood.

Criteria are not met for another specific Pervasive Developmental Disorder or Schizophrenia.

Diagnostic Features
The essential features of Asperger's Disorder are severe and sustained impairment in social interaction (Criterion A) and the development of restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests, and activities (Criterion B). The disturbance must cause clinically significant impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning (Criterion C). In contrast to Autistic Disorder, there are no clinically significant delays or deviance in language acquisition (e.g., single non-echoed words are used communicatively by age 2 years, and spontaneous communicative phrases are used by age 3 years) (Criterion D), although more subtle aspects of social communication (e.g., typical give-and-take in conversation) may be affected. In addition, during the first 3 years of life, there are no clinically significant delays in cognitive development as manifested by expressing normal curiosity about the environment or in the acquisition of age-appropriate learning skills and adaptive behaviors (other than in social interaction) (Criterion E). Finally, the criteria are not met for another specific Pervasive Developmental Disorder or for Schizophrenia (Criterion F). This condition is also termed Asperger's syndrome.
The impairment in reciprocal social interaction is gross and sustained. There may be marked impairment in the use of multiple nonverbal behaviors (e.g., eye-to-eye gaze, facial expression, body postures and gestures) to regulate social interaction and communication (Criterion A1). There may be failure to develop peer relationships appropriate to developmental level (Criterion A2) that may take different forms at different ages. Younger individuals may have little or no interest in establishing friendships. Older individuals may have an interest in friendship but lack understanding of the conventions of social interaction. There may be a lack of spontaneous seeking to share enjoyment, interests, or achievements with other people (e.g., not showing, bringing, or pointing out objects they find interesting) (Criterion A3). Lack of social or emotional reciprocity may be present (e.g., not actively participating in simple social play or games, preferring solitary activities, or involving others in activities only as tools or "mechanical" aids) (Criterion A4). Although the social deficit in Asperger's Disorder is severe and is defined in the same way as in Autistic Disorder, the lack of social reciprocity is more typically manifest by an eccentric and one-sided social approach to others (e.g., pursuing a conversational topic regardless of others' reactions) rather than social and emotional indifference.
As in Autistic Disorder, restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests, and activities are present (Criterion B). Often these are primarily manifest in the development of encompassing preoccupations about a circumscribed topic or interest, about which the individual can amass a great deal of facts and information (Criterion B1). These interests and activities are pursued with great intensity often to the exclusion of other activities.
The disturbance must cause clinically significant impairment in social adaptation, which in turn may have a significant impact on self-suffiency or on occupational or other important areas of functioning (Criterion C). The social deficits and restricted patterns of interests, activities, and behavior are the source of considerable disability.
In contrast to Autistic Disorder, there are no clinically significant delays in early language (e.g., single words are used by age 2, communicative phrases are used by age 3) (Criterion D). Subsequent language may be unusual in terms of the individual's preoccupation with certain topics and his or her verbosity. Difficulties in communication may result from social dysfunction and the failure to appreciate and utilize conventional rules of conversation, failure to appreciate nonverbal cues, and limited capacities for self-monitoring.
Individuals with Asperger's Disorder do not have clinically significant delays in cognitive development or in age-appropriate self-help skills, adaptive behavior (other than in social interaction), and curiosity about the environment in childhood (Criterion E). Because early language and cognitive skills are within normal limits in the first 3 years of life, parents or caregivers are not usually concerned about the child's development during that time, although upon detailed interviewing they may recall unusual behaviors. The child may be described as talking before walking, and indeed parents may believe the child to be precocious (e.g., with a rich or "adult" vocabulary). Although subtle social problems may exist, parents or caregivers often are not concerned until the child begins to attend a preschool or is exposed to same-age children; at this point the child's social difficulties with same-age peers may become apparent.
By definition the diagnosis is not given if the criteria are met for any other specific Pervasive Developmental Disorder or for Schizophrenia (although the diagnoses of Asperger's Disorder and Schizophrenia may coexist if the onset of the Asperger's Disorder clearly preceded the onset of Schizophrenia) (Criterion F).
Associated Features and Disorders
In contrast to Autistic Disorder, Mental Retardation is not usually observed in Asperger's Disorder, although occasional cases in which Mild Mental Retardation is present have been noted (e.g., when the Mental Retardation becomes apparent only in the school years, with no apparent cognitive or language delay in the first years of life). Variability of cognitive functioning may be observed, often with strengths in areas of verbal ability (e.g., vocabulary, rote auditory memory) and weaknesses in nonverbal areas (e.g., visual-motor and visual-spatial skills). Motor clumsiness and awkwardness may be present but usually are relatively mild, although motor difficulties may contribute to peer rejection and social isolation (e.g., inability to participate in group sports). Symptoms of overactivity and inattention are frequent in Asperger's Disorder, and indeed many individuals with this condition receive a diagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder prior to the diagnosis of Asperger's Disorder. Asperger's Disorder has been reported to be associated with a number of other mental disorders, including Depressive Disorders.
Specific Age and Gender Features
The clinical picture may present differently at different ages. Often the social disability of individuals with the disorder becomes more striking over time. By adolescence some individuals with the disorder may learn to use areas of strength (e.g., rote verbal abilities) to compensate for areas of weakness. Individuals with Asperger's Disorder may experience victimization by others; this, and feelings of social isolation and an increasing capacity for self-awareness, may contribute to the development of depression and anxiety in adolescence and young adulthood. The disorder is diagnosed much more frequently (at least five times) in males than in females.
Prevalence
Definitive data regarding the prevalence of Asperger's Disorder are lacking.
Course
Asperger's Disorder is a continuous and lifelong disorder. In school-age children, good verbal abilities may, to some extent, mask the severity of the child's social dysfunction and may also mislead caregivers and teachers—that is, caregivers and teachers may focus on the child's good verbal skills but be insufficiently aware of problems in other areas (particularly social adjustment). The child's relatively good verbal skills may also lead teachers and caregivers to erroneously attribute behavioral difficulties to willfulness or stubbornness in the child. Interest in forming social relationships may increase in adolescence as the individuals learn some ways of responding more adaptively to their difficulties—for example, the individual may learn to apply explicit verbal rules or routines in certain stressful situations. Older individuals may have an interest in friendship but lack understanding of the conventions of social interaction and may more likely make relationships with individuals much older or younger than themselves. The prognosis appears significantly better than in Autistic Disorder, as follow-up studies suggest that, as adults, many individuals are capable of gainful employment and personal self-sufficiency.
Familial Pattern
Although the available data are limited, there appears to be an increased frequency of Asperger's Disorder among family members of individuals who have the disorder. There may also be an increased risk for Autistic Disorder as well as more general social difficulties.
Differential Diagnosis
Asperger's Disorder must be distinguished from the other Pervasive Developmental Disorders, all of which are characterized by problems in social interaction. It differs from Autistic Disorder in several ways. In Autistic Disorder there are, by definition, significant abnormalities in the areas of social interaction, language, and play, whereas in Asperger's Disorder early cognitive and language skills are not delayed significantly. Furthermore, in Autistic Disorder, restricted, repetitive, and stereotyped interests and activities are often characterized by the presence of motor mannerisms, preoccupation with parts of objects, rituals, and marked distress in change, whereas in Asperger's Disorder these are primarily observed in the all-encompassing pursuit of a circumscribed interest involving a topic to which the individual devotes inordinate amounts of time amassing information and facts. Differentiation of the two conditions can be problematic in some cases. In Autistic Disorder, typical social interaction patterns are marked by self-isolation or markedly rigid social approaches, whereas in Asperger's Disorder there may appear to be motivation for approaching others even though this is then done in a highly eccentric, one-sided, verbose, and insensitive manner.
Asperger's Disorder must also be differentiated from Pervasive Developmental Disorders other than Autistic Disorder. Rett's Disorder differs from Asperger's Disorder in its characteristic sex ratio and pattern of deficits. Rett's Disorder has been diagnosed only in females, whereas Asperger's Disorder occurs much more frequently in males. In Rett's Disorder, there is a characteristic pattern of head growth deceleration, loss of previously acquired purposeful hand skills, and the appearance of poorly coordinated gait or trunk movements. Rett's Disorder is also associated with marked degrees of Mental Retardation and gross impairments in language and communication.
Asperger's Disorder differs from Childhood Disintegrative Disorder, which has a distinctive pattern of developmental regression following at least 2 years of normal development. Children with Childhood Disintegrative Disorder also display marked degrees of Mental Retardation and language impairment. In contrast, in Asperger's Disorder there is no pattern of developmental regression and, by definition, no significant cognitive or language delays.
Schizophrenia of childhood onset usually develops after years of normal, or near normal, development, and characteristic features of the disorder, including hallucinations, delusions, and disorganized speech, are present. In Selective Mutism, the child usually exhibits appropriate communication skills in certain contexts and does not have the severe impairment in social interaction and the restricted patterns of behavior associated with Asperger's Disorder. Conversely, individuals with Asperger's Disorder are typically verbose. In Expressive Language Disorder and Mixed Receptive-Expressive Language Disorder, there is language impairment but no associated qualitative impairment in social interaction and restricted, repetitive, and stereotyped patterns of behavior. Some individuals with Asperger's Disorder may exhibit behavioral patterns suggesting Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, although special clinical attention should be given to the differentiation between preoccupations and activities in Asperger's Disorder and obsessions and compulsions in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. In Asperger's Disorder these interests are the source of some apparent pleasure or comfort, whereas in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder they are the source of anxiety. Furthermore, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder is typically not associated with the level of impairment in social interaction and social communication seen in Asperger's Disorder.
The relationship between Asperger's Disorder and Schizoid Personality Disorder is unclear. In general, the social difficulties in Asperger's Disorder are more severe and of earlier onset. Although some individuals with Asperger's Disorder may experience heightened and debilitating anxiety in social settings as in Social Phobia or other Anxiety Disorders, the latter conditions are not characterized by pervasive impairments in social development or by the circumscribed interests typical of Asperger's Disorder. Asperger's Disorder must be distinguished from normal social awkwardness and normal age-appropriate interests and hobbies. In Asperger's Disorder, the social deficits are quite severe and the preoccupations are all-encompassing and interfere with the acquisition of basic skills.


I was confused when you suggested that you could not find the statement on Aspergers as a disability anywhere in the DSMIV TR, after it appeared that you quoted it from the DSMIV TR. Di-logic, paraphrased the exact quote, in describing Aspergers as a disability, but his paraphrasing matches the description that you found, bolded above, for Aspergers in the DSMIV TR.

Quote:
The social deficits and restricted patterns of interests, activities, and behavior are the source of considerable disability


Disability by definition is a limit of human functioning. So, by that definition, social deficits and restricted patterns of interest are impairments in everyday functioning that are the source of considerable human limitations.

The elaboration on the diagnostic features was one of the changes in 2000, in the DSMIV TR, that clarified that Aspergers was a considerable disability.

The change in the wording: the symptoms together impair and limit everyday life functioning in Criteria D, in the DSMV, is not a higher requirement than the current wording in the diagnostic features for Aspergers in the DSMIV TR that identify impairments in everyday functioning, specified as social deficits and RRB's. as a considerable source of disability.

So, all currently diagnosed under the DSMIV TR already meet the requirement of D in the DSMV through the elaboration of the diagnostic features in the DSMIV TR, defining the impairments in everyday life functioning in Aspergers as a source of considerable disability.

As to your question on why there wouldn't be different criteria for adults than children, some adults now that might have qualified for a diagnosis and clinical classification as HFA or Aspergers as children, are currently diagnosed as PDD NOS, because they have adapted as adults and don't meet the full criteria of either Autism Disorder or Aspergers. For those that don't have RRB's they may be moved over to SCD.

As far as Adults that currently meet the criteria for Aspergers, they will likely still meet the criteria for Aspergers, regardless of changes in criteria D, because of the changes that were made to the Diagnostic features, in the year 2000, in the DSMIV TR.

Regardless, if there is a history of the disorder starting in childhood or adolscence, adults will still have to meet similiar criteria in the DSMV that are currently required for a diagnosis

The previous proposed wording that stated symptoms must be present in early childhood, would have been a problem for both Aspergers youth that develop observable symptoms of the condition later in childhood, and adults that must provide information of when their symptoms became evident.

Since adults are already required to meet similiar criteria requirements for the DSMV, in the DSMIV, now, I'm not sure what changes you would like to see made for an adult criteria.

The criteria D issue appears to be a non-issue, because there is already a similiar description in the diagnostic features in the DSMIV for Aspergers.



antimuda
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2011
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 45

10 Feb 2012, 10:17 am

aghogday-

There are two discrete issues that were being discussed. One was the rationale and implications of including the word limit. The other issue was whether Aspergers qualifies as a disability.

To the second point of if Aspergers is currently a disability. The Social Security Administration, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and US Federal Courts (Taylor v Food World) all recognize the behaviors that characterize Asperger's as potentially meeting the criteria of a federally disability. My point, which I agree I did not make particularly well, in regard to "The social deficits and restricted patterns of interests, activities, and behavior are the source of considerable disability". The term disability in this context is ambiguous as the colloquial, statutory and legal definitions are quite different.

Colloquial

Quote:
anything that disables or puts one at a disadvantage


Statutory
Quote:
a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities of such individual


Legal
Quote:
A “disability” exists only where an impairment “substantially limits” a major life activity, not where it “might,” “could,” or “would” be substantially limiting if corrective measures were not taken.


The fact that disability is modified by considerable, further indicates its colloquial usage. If we consider the colloquial definition , disability is very similar in meaning to impairment. This also agrees with the language "significant impairment" found DSM-IV-TR criteria C
Quote:
C. The disturbance causes clinically significant impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.


The point I was trying to make under the new DSM-V, is that there is no ambiguity in meaning. ASD is a disability since diagnostic criteria requires the behaviors to limit and impair daily functioning.


To the point of the inclusion of limit in criteria D. We first must be clear there are two discrete issues, one is Asperger's being subsumed by ASD and the other is the changes in the ASD Criteria.

In regard ASD . In the commentary on from DSM-IV-TR (pm me for the complete document) , a form of the term impair is used 16 times and a disability is used 0. Each paragraph of the diagnostic features begins with "The impairment..." The term limit also does not appear. Therefore the concept of a disability is completely new

In regard to Aspegers. The question you raise whether the term disability necessarily constitutes a limit is valid. I have yet to find a dictionary definition that defines disability and includes the term limit. If we were to consider the statutory definition it would have to be read in light of Sutton which applies a unique application of limit. Otherwise the colloquial definition is for an impairment.

So in the case of ASD, limit is new to the diagnostic criteria and for Aspergers it may be new.



antimuda
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2011
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 45

10 Feb 2012, 10:28 am

aghogday-

Quote:
As to your question on why there wouldn't be different criteria for adults than children, some adults now that might have qualified for a diagnosis and clinical classification as HFA or Aspergers as children, are currently diagnosed as PDD NOS, because they have adapted as adults and don't meet the full criteria of either Autism Disorder or Aspergers. For those that don't have RRB's they may be moved over to SCD.


As far as Adults that currently meet the criteria for Aspergers, they will likely still meet the criteria for Aspergers, regardless of changes in criteria D, because of the changes that were made to the Diagnostic features, in the year 2000, in the DSMIV TR. [/quote]

Social Communication Disorder

Quote:
A. Social Communication Disorder (SCD) is an impairment of pragmatics and is diagnosed based on difficulty in the social uses of verbal and nonverbal communication in naturalistic contexts, which affects the development of social relationships and discourse comprehension and cannot be explained by low abilities in the domains of word structure and grammar or general cognitive ability.
B. The low social communication abilities result in functional limitations in effective communication, social participation, academic achievement, or occupational performance, alone or in any combination.
C. Rule out Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Autism Spectrum Disorder by definition encompasses pragmatic communication problems, but also includes restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests or activities as part of the autism spectrum. Therefore, ASD needs to be ruled out for SCD to be diagnosed.
D. Symptoms must be present in early childhood (but may not become fully manifest until social demands exceed limited capacities).


The problem with SCD is that in criteria D we have the same requirement of the presence in early childhood which as found in criteria C of ASD

My question which is only tangentially related to the DSM-V Change (in the rationale for the removal of Asperger's the difficulty in establishing an early childhood history was cited) , if an individual is able to meet DSM-V criteria A,B and D for ASD but can not substantiate C [care giver interviews not possible etc] what is their diagnosis?

Additionally if they fail to qualify for a diagnosis based upon missing C, how would their course of treatment be different?



Tuttle
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,088
Location: Massachusetts

10 Feb 2012, 11:09 am

antimuda wrote:
My question which is only tangentially related to the DSM-V Change (in the rationale for the removal of Asperger's the difficulty in establishing an early childhood history was cited) , if an individual is able to meet DSM-V criteria A,B and D for ASD but can not substantiate C [care giver interviews not possible etc] what is their diagnosis?

Additionally if they fail to qualify for a diagnosis based upon missing C, how would their course of treatment be different?


And I gave you a possible diagnosis and you completely overlooked it.

It might be schizophrenia, the negative symptoms of the schizophrenia spectrum are very similar to the traits of ASDs.

It might be anxiety related. I've seen social anxiety lead to both RRBs and all of the traits of A.

It might be something else.

These however are things that are not present from birth.



Last edited by Tuttle on 10 Feb 2012, 1:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.