noobler wrote:
how about "conscript" and "sharpshooter"
or "imperial guardsman" and "sanctioned psyker"
personally if we take the first set of distinctions, I want to be called a "flamethrower"
just kidding around, neurotypical is fine, the worry that they'll see the word "typical" and think it's some scathing insult is unfounded, because the word neuro-typical "scientifizes" it, and people generally understand the "scientifized" word typical to mean "regular/normal/the usual"
alone, combined with tone of voice, the term "typical" takes on pejorative meaning but when combined with super sciency things like "neuro" it's an indicator to take it by it's "dictionary definition" meaning
which in this case isn't really it's dictionary definition meaning, but hey who cares, it's how they see it and that's why we don't have to worry
The word neurotypical is not in the dictionary or a scientific term. It is a phrase coined in the autism community, that can effectively mean nothing but non-autistic, as typical neurology exists nowhere except in human imagination.
The only problem with neurotypical is ask anyone on the spectrum what it means and they will provide their own unique definition, as one can only look it up on Wiki, and get a fuzzy idea of a definition
Most people that have not visited an online autism site, have absolutely no idea what it means, and never even hear it in real life, so it is not a significant source of any offense toward anyone, no matter how it is defined or used online vs. the real world outside of online autism communities..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurotypical