Highlander852456 wrote:
Yes Rainman is not even autistic. However this is the way people like to see autism. I just read a webpage where they are associating autism with Rainman. In anycase Rainman was idiot savant and his condition is due to split brain not because of autism at all.
What is even more bizarre is that Simon Baron-Cohen has actually made this goof. As in, calling Kim Peek autistic. If a supposed world-renowned expert on autism is going make an error like that, I'd suggest that the bulk of the population be cut a bit of slack as well. (Baron-Cohen makes this error in
The Science of Evil: On Empathy and the Origins of Cruelty, 2011 p. 166.)
Of course, Baron-Cohen also asserts that autism is a form of brain damage, with the sole caveat that the exact area of the brain so damaged to render one autistic has not yet been determined. (Baron-Cohen offers up this gem in
Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind , 1995 pp. 94-95.) Since this particular essay is now close to twenty years old I'd like to think he's disavowed this statement somewhere or other along the line. But, if so, I've yet to read that he has.
Do wish I'd scanned those particular pages from the books in question. But I did my specifically cite both page references when I wrote brief reviews of both books on my Goodreads account.
Anyway, with "friends" like Baron-Cohen, is it any wonder we don't seem to get the best of media portrayals?
_________________
"The man who has fed the chicken every day throughout its life at last wrings its neck instead, showing that more refined views as to the uniformity of nature would have been useful to the chicken." ? Bertrand Russell