mikewhateverm wrote:
https://www.change.org/p/autism-society-of-america-remove-steve-silberman-as-the-closing-keynote-speaker-from-the-47th-national-conference
Steve Silberman is an autism writer that trivializes the disabilities that autistics face. When he was criticized for not including descriptions of low functioning autistics that wear diapers and bang their heads in his book Neurotribes, he said in an interview
"Disability is Part of the Human Experience".
I don't think he was denying them or their challenges, but merely trying to say that we should not reduce them to their functioning within the spectrum. However, given how the almost only description people get of autism, is an autism for (male) severe autistics, I think talking about the rest of us, does no harm. We know about Rainman and "savants, but we don't hear often about others.
If people want to read about autistics on the severe end of the spectrum, they could look at books like An Anthropologist on Mars, or Far From the Tree, those both focus on low-functioning people (and mention Temple Grandin b/c lolz).
However, you could ALSO accuse those books of people overly discretionary, and myopic on their focus of "only" low-functioning male autistics.
Besides the book was long enough as-is. Finally, the word phrase "disability is part of the human experience" I think was supposed to be inclusive. In other words, a nice sentiment...
Also, I think we all know about the negative affects of autism. I think a la A$ that's pretty much the ONLY thing people know about autism right now. That's all I ever hear about.
Besides, instead of saying "negative affects of Autism" why can't we say: "The services for people are inadequate for a number of reasons and here's what we can do to change that." instead of banning people like Mr.Silberman from speaking about different things. Banning him from a conference isn't going to do anything.