Tory_canuck wrote:
I consider myself a "Principled Conservative" or a Canadian Grassroots Reformer and thus am sort of aligned with this former party.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reform_Party_of_CanadaI have conservative beliefs but don't align myself with any current party here in Canada since all of them seem to be pandering to the left and all support the suppression of free speech.If anyone follows the free speech debate in Canada, you will know what I mean...
I had not been following the free speech debate in Canada - never heard of it, I am embarrassed to say. I did google it and found a very interesting debate.
My people supported the underground railroad way back in the 1830s from the Carolina end – when it was unpopular to do so. It is a family tradition for us to protect the rights of those politically less powerful until they have their own voice.
I strongly, ferociously, feel that everyone has a right to their own
voice, but it is not exactly the same as freely speaking. A voice communicates the needs of a community, but speech sometimes spews garbage that does pollute the environment - a fine line.
I totally believe in live & let live as long as it does not harm others, but harm is easy to define when you can hold up a victim and say, "Look!" A climate of hate is more nebulous, but can indirectly produce victims of obvious physical violence. But more pervasively impacts on employment, housing, back stabbing, and other areas of life that contribute to human dignity.
If it is allowed to happen to one group, it will extend to others – including us. Autistics often deal with intolerance, cruelness, and back stabbing as well as direct violence: a loss of human dignity. If each person on WP, AFF, and the other sites wrote in to voice the prejudices they have faced and the resulting harm emotionally and spiritually, if not physically (although there is that too), it would be overwhelming – we would drown it!
Our world needs less hate, not to protect hate – but we also need to be able to use our voices freely to speak up to minority (in power, not numbers) rights when it is not popular to do so. I hope some interesting discussions that clarify the boundaries between speech that supports a climate of hate against specific groups and a specific group speaking to their needs emerges. The guiding principle should be: does it increase love for others or does it increase hate for others.
_________________
~
We sour green apples live our own inscrutable, carefree lives... (Max Frei)
~