ci wrote:
Right. Be nasty and so on then claim I am yet refuse to respectfully and comprehensively in an intellectual way debate all together. It just seems like some people of a very rigid side just don't want to be civil. I have offered civility, practical forms of understanding and have even made available multiple communication styles. It's at this point only about the potential of personal attacks with you and obviously. Your being unreasonable here from the get go and that is not by fault but your choice.
You are not worth debating.
Anyone wishing to examine the issues raised are invited to examine my posting history (it is not large: 91 as of this post) and then sample your posts.
ci wrote:
Again I ask you not to post in my topics if your intent is to just conduct personal attacks and not be reasonable to discuss the issues. If you persist that's on you. Hatred and anger are also personal life style choices and you have made yours in some random false belief I hate you.
These are
not 'your topics'. You have posted the OP in far too many threads, but everyone is welcome to post responses as they see fit.
You often make statements that are some combination of inpenetrable, wrong, and offensive.
While I have no interest in having a discussion with you (for I don't think that you have much to offer in the way of discussion), I do think that I and others should post responses pointing out your errors, objecting to your rude and insulting statements, and rejecting positions that are insupportable.
_________________
Diagnosed: OCD, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Dysthemia
Undiagnosed: AS (Aspie: 176/200, NT: 37/200)
High functioning, software engineer, algorithms, cats, books
Last edited by AlanTuring on 17 Aug 2011, 9:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.