AuroraBorealisGazer wrote:
Jiheisho wrote:
Tony Attwood states the HFA and Asperger's is the same, except for the spelling. However, he defends the use of Asperger's because it is a better public facing diagnosis that carries less stigma for not only the person with HFA but also for those around him/her/them. DSM-V simply recognized no difference between HFA and Asperger's and removed Asperger's.
Interesting. I guess I can see how it could be easier for people in some regards. I just wish we could break the stigmas associated with these terms. It seems the general public knows very little about autism.
I totally agree with the problem of public perception. The complexity of the autism spectrum does not make this easy. Nor does the problem of social communication central to autism, which NTs take so much for granted--this is why I think autistics get labelled as having a personality issue rather than a cognitive one. And in that regard, Asperger's can be a very useful term.
Personally, this has been a complex problem for me as how do I talk about my autism? I have simply referred to it as "autism," without making a high-functioning claim. But then I can present a rather confident persona (sans eye contact) and probably can get away with it better than others. But I also know my audience is not able to grasp exactly what autism is, so tends to be a bit abstract.