zendell wrote:
I watched it. It was pretty bad. I don't like the woman's attitude. She talked about putting him in an institution but the child's father wouldn't allow it. She seemed less concerned about her autistic son than how her son affected her life although she did worry about him being abused in an institution. She said, "This is what kind of life I have to live because my doctor couldn't tell me that my son was going to be disabled." She said it's her worst nightmare and wishes she had a normal child and talked about how he affected her life. Dr. Phil thinks he might be better off in an institution.
Interestingly, they mentioned he received tons of antibiotics. One study found autistics were given more antibiotics in the first few years of life to treat ear infections. Scientific evidence shows that antibiotics reduce the ability to get rid of mercury and may cause yeast/fungal issues that can lead to autistic symptoms. The child didn't receive treatment for these issues. I think it's sad that the medical community won't cure these treatable problems (yeast/fungal infections) that can improve the lives of those suffering from them.
As much as I cannot stand that SOB, I'm afraid he might have a point here. If the mother is that bad, if she really feels that way and isn't just blowing steam, then that might be worse for that poor child than being in an institution. I almost never agree with institutionalization, but, in some cases, it may really be better. Or maybe the father could divorce the mother and get custody himself; I don't think a judge would have a problem with giving him custody with a mother like that.
_________________
Queen of the anti-FAAAS. FAAAS does NOT speak for me and many other families!!
Life is not about waiting out storms, but learning to dance in the rain-Anonymous