passionatebach wrote:
I have been thinking about this all night and have a theory as to why they promote only the most severe cases of autism to the general public.
I helped a friend run a community of 1,000 people after a big flood a couple of years ago. I had a lot of contact with both local and national non-profits. One of the things that non-profits agencies do in order to raise funds for their causes is to bring attention to sob stories that involve their cause so people will contribute money and time. Just look at that ASPCA ad that uses Sarah McLaughlin's song, Angel. I think that this is why Autism Speaks puts the videos, ads and literature out that they do, with the message that they convey.
On the other hand, people also contribute when they hear of stories of people associated with a certain cause overcome the odds. I did this again, when I was helping in my friend's community. My friend was appointed mayor of the community after the flood. I told people of his struggles and disabilities as a child. In many ways, this gave people a segue to give money and time in his community, and may of been an underlining reason why rebuilding was so expedited in that community.
I still would like to write Autism Speaks and let them know that there are people within the autism/Aspergers community that have made great contributions to industry and society. Along with promoting the sob stories about severe cases of autism, this may also give them another soapbox to promote autism/Aspergers, so people can take interest and contribute time and money for this cause.
There are two reasons why Autism Speaks make everything look so negative:
1) Money - as you said, sob stories get more money. Autism Speaks then spend this money on more propaganda and massive salaries.
2) The people running it are horribe, at least from what we publically know about them. The person who's the executive vice president of Autism Speaks actually said she would drive her autistic daughter off a bridge if it wasen't for her other NT daughter. I believe you can watch her saying that in the Autism Every Day propaganda film.
By the way, I'm not exaggurating when I say propaganda. Wikipedia says propaganda is:
Quote:
Propaganda is a form of communication aimed at influencing the attitude of a community toward some cause or position. As opposed to impartially providing information, propaganda in its most basic sense, presents information primarily to influence an audience. Propaganda often presents facts selectively (thus possibly lying by omission) to encourage a particular synthesis, or uses loaded messages to produce an emotional rather than rational response to the information presented. The desired result is a change of the attitude toward the subject in the target audience to further a political agenda.
Which is exactly what Autism Speaks are doing, giving a one-sided view of autism so they can exploit it for their own purpose and financial gain.