Grrrr, vaccine ARE connected with autism. >.< That's a

Post Reply New Topic

No, it's either autism or it isn't. You can't have 'autism-like' when autism itself is both a syndrome and a spectrum.

Autism isn't mercury poisoning, and it isn't being drunk, or any other things along those lines.

It's their way of glossing over the fact that the girl WAS given autism by the jabs, and about as close as they'll come to saying so - through clever use of language most people with little to no understanding or experience of the syndrome won't realise that it is simple linguistic manipulation and that there is no 'autism-like symptoms'. Hell, I have 'autism like symptoms', so does everyone else anywhere on the spectrum, even those most low-functioning and diagnosed young.

It really irks me how they do this to deceive the public...

I imagine they'll be getting her one soon though..!

I still think this is a huge victory for those of us who were induced into autism by vaccines. Not all of us were, but there are those on the spectrum who I firmly believe were for whatever predisposing reason, and they need to be recognised as such. There's so much toxic rubbish in those things, it's hardly a radical or inconceivable idea - this is a huge step for people who were damaged without consent.

Still no way in hell my children will be vaccinated. I'd rather home-school them than put that crap in their systems, pre-disposed to anything or not.

LeKiwi, the girl in the news story has a mitochondrial disease. Whether she got vaccines or not, she would have many of the same problems she does now. They're just saying the vaccines made her disease worse. They are not going to diagnose her with autism any time soon, she has a separate disease that is not autism, it just has similar symptoms.

Actually, that's not true. They do still contain thimerosal.

Here's the CDC's list of vaccine additives...

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbo ... able-2.pdf

Note the thimerosal, aluminium, formeldehyde, monkey kidney tissue, bovine tissue, glutamate, egg proteins, embryo tissues....

Formeldehyde is embalming fluid... it's carconigenic and neurotoxic. You do NOT need it and yes, a little more can actually do great harm.

The point of that was to show that actually, vaccines DO still contain thimerosal, as well as all manner of awful adjuvants and additives.

Someone needs to do a bit of reading...

The toxicity of any substance is a matter of degree, not just what it is. Without sodium, you would die. Too much sodium, and you will die. Even water can be poisonous, in sufficiently large amounts - you may recall a year or so ago, when a radio station was holding a contest ("Hold Your Wii!"), in which the person who could go the longest without urinating after drinking several gallons of water would win a Nintendo Wii. The lady who won collapsed shortly thereafter and died, killed by the toxic levels of water in her stomach.

The danger level for formaldehyde exposure would appear, from a cursory scan of the available data, to be on the order of 0.1 ppm. Would you happen to have a figure on the formaldehyde levels of various vaccines? (I presume the level would vary from formulation to formulation.)

(Added later)

Ah, I found a source for information on the question of formaldehyde and vaccines:

The CDC website has a table on it somewhere of the amounts of all additives to its vaccines... if you go to the link I posted about showing the various additives, there'll be a related page somewhere that'll have the quantities. It varies from vaccine to vaccine obviously but the data is there.

Either way, I think you're absolutely insane if you would willingly inject that kind of poison into your child over and over again, knowing what it contained and what those things could do. No, not insane - criminally insane.