I Am Autism - The War On Autism
You are making one giant mistake in assuming autism is a disease - this is simply not been proven to be so as of yet.
It is obviously a disease to anyone who hasn't bought into the pro-autism delusion.
Could you show proof of your convictions?
Gladly.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21074045
A model for neural development and treatment of Rett syndrome using human induced pluripotent stem cells.
Abstract:
Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are complex neurodevelopmental diseases in which different combinations of genetic mutations may contribute to the phenotype. Using Rett syndrome (RTT) as an ASD genetic model, we developed a culture system using induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from RTT patients' fibroblasts. RTT patients' iPSCs are able to undergo X-inactivation and generate functional neurons. Neurons derived from RTT-iPSCs had fewer synapses, reduced spine density, smaller soma size, altered calcium signaling and electrophysiological defects when compared to controls. Our data uncovered early alterations in developing human RTT neurons. Finally, we used RTT neurons to test the effects of drugs in rescuing synaptic defects. Our data provide evidence of an unexplored developmental window, before disease onset, in RTT syndrome where potential therapies could be successfully employed. Our model recapitulates early stages of a human neurodevelopmental disease and represents a promising cellular tool for drug screening, diagnosis and personalized treatment.
The scientific community views autism spectrum disorders as a diseases.
Just because wrong planet says that 2+2 = 5 doesn't make it so.
The delusion that "austism isn't a disease" may sooth egos on this website, but it holds no weight in the real world.
I am glad you bring arguments to the table, I will get back on this later since my medical knowledge lacks to correctly interpret what is said here.
I'll ask a friend of mine to go over this document, since he does have the knowledge and education to make sense of this all.
Since my medical knowledge is too small to interpret this correctly I do hope your arguments on that autism being a disease aren't just based upon the phrasing used in this document.
I see you soon.
Cheerfully,
Wallourdes
The medical definition of "disease"
disease /dis·ease/ (dĭ-zēz´) any deviation from or interruption of the normal structure or function of any body part, organ, or system that is manifested by a characteristic set of symptoms and signs and whose etiology, pathology, and prognosis may be known or unknown.
Words have meanings. Autism clearly fits into the above definition.
When people say that autism or asperger isn't a disease, they are twisting the truth for their own ends.
You may not like your condition being called a disease, but truth isn't a popularity contest.
This definition of disease, as you are trying to apply it to autism, supposes that we clearly know the "normal" structure and function of all parts of the brain. That is not so. The brain and the body are much more diverse than what the "average" (normal) person is comfortable with and what we know is only the begining. Words have meanings but the meanings change and are not the same as the thing itself. Hysteria used to be a "disease" as did homosexuality as someone else mentioned. "Diseases" involving mental states and behaviors outside the average should be regarded very suspiciously, IMO. Also, the study you cited only states authoratativly that autism is a disease, it offers no proof for that claim. And Retts syndrome and autism are not the same thing according to the Retts site I just looked at. Retts leads to an early death, is genetic and only affects females. This study seems to say only that neruons from Rett people could be grown in culture and some intervention could cause them to develop differently. Of course the authors of the study might want to overreach their conculsions to imagine that they will discover the cure for autism.
You are making one giant mistake in assuming autism is a disease - this is simply not been proven to be so as of yet.
It is obviously a disease to anyone who hasn't bought into the pro-autism delusion.
Could you show proof of your convictions?
Gladly.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21074045
A model for neural development and treatment of Rett syndrome using human induced pluripotent stem cells.
Abstract:
Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are complex neurodevelopmental diseases in which different combinations of genetic mutations may contribute to the phenotype. Using Rett syndrome (RTT) as an ASD genetic model, we developed a culture system using induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from RTT patients' fibroblasts. RTT patients' iPSCs are able to undergo X-inactivation and generate functional neurons. Neurons derived from RTT-iPSCs had fewer synapses, reduced spine density, smaller soma size, altered calcium signaling and electrophysiological defects when compared to controls. Our data uncovered early alterations in developing human RTT neurons. Finally, we used RTT neurons to test the effects of drugs in rescuing synaptic defects. Our data provide evidence of an unexplored developmental window, before disease onset, in RTT syndrome where potential therapies could be successfully employed. Our model recapitulates early stages of a human neurodevelopmental disease and represents a promising cellular tool for drug screening, diagnosis and personalized treatment.
The scientific community views autism spectrum disorders as a diseases.
Just because wrong planet says that 2+2 = 5 doesn't make it so.
The delusion that "austism isn't a disease" may sooth egos on this website, but it holds no weight in the real world.
I am glad you bring arguments to the table, I will get back on this later since my medical knowledge lacks to correctly interpret what is said here.
I'll ask a friend of mine to go over this document, since he does have the knowledge and education to make sense of this all.
Since my medical knowledge is too small to interpret this correctly I do hope your arguments on that autism being a disease aren't just based upon the phrasing used in this document.
I see you soon.
Cheerfully,
Wallourdes
The medical definition of "disease"
disease /dis·ease/ (dĭ-zēz´) any deviation from or interruption of the normal structure or function of any body part, organ, or system that is manifested by a characteristic set of symptoms and signs and whose etiology, pathology, and prognosis may be known or unknown.
Words have meanings. Autism clearly fits into the above definition.
When people say that autism or asperger isn't a disease, they are twisting the truth for their own ends.
You may not like your condition being called a disease, but truth isn't a popularity contest.
I've got a reaction of my friend and he told me the following:
"The researcher makes a very bold statement by making a conclusion about autism in general based upon RETT syndrome.
RETT is a pretty rare in terms of appearance. With it's very specific own traits."
I eagerly await your response.
Cheerfully,
Wallourdes
Exactly what I thought. Without looking it up I'm pretty sure Retts, like Fragile X and Angleman syndrome is a disease with a clearly known genetic cause. No one knows the cause of Autism so these ponderings seem to be a bunch of assumptions, or perhaps I am misunderstanding that quoted excerpt.
To my mind Autism is a disability (in the pure sense of the word i.e. dis-ability, rather than the general negative connotation the word disability has taken on).
I think autism is not one thing exactly and later will be understood despite others opposition to research to protect there autism identity. If someone in self-advocacy did not have developmental delays I think they should be separate in advocacy then people with more severe abilities. Also with regards to the terminology of disease it is simply a word and will later be figured out aside from simple behavior concepts.
Folks spend more time arguing about silly words then improving the lives of those who are more in need of help. Also if you think of autism as a identity I think allot of this insult is brought upon you yourself. As for I am Autism most of the mainstream would have a problem with the video but also some parents with children with very severe autism they would sympathize with despite the at times higher functioning people claiming oh the pity and how insulting it is when they are utterly ignorant of the struggles and so very self-centered in ego. It's not all about you and please just get over it.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Having Autism |
19 Dec 2024, 12:00 pm |
Autistic vs Has Autism |
Today, 12:21 am |
PTSD or autism |
03 Nov 2024, 5:13 pm |
Teenager with Autism and OCD |
16 Dec 2024, 12:26 pm |