The Theory of Mindlessness - A polemic

Post Reply New Topic

I'm wondering if your doing it on purpose or you just don't know that your doing it. You attack my project then say you are not when it's obvious, assuming I am asking you only think what I think yet ask that I think the way you think when I speak about simply respecting a diversity of thinking. Debating you is like debating a trap door. Your put downs toward others, nastiness and unfriendly discourse with no resolute to just picking apart matters just reflects your agenda. Instill hatred toward personalities and people that are not like your0s in the attempt to bully your perspective or else I and others are pathetic. It's just that simple.

No, sorry ci. Nice try but no. You can't accept that I have different beliefs from you. That is the problem. THat's why I am hammering you. I have no problem with advocacy. I just think you're arrogantly making up stuff about how important you are and trying to pound people down and I am fighting against that.

Ever think that maybe your jealous of strong and effective leadership and are being destructive due to envy? In person if you met me and didn't tell me who you were from this forum that image and idea in your mind of me would quickly go away. I am simply a person with autism who is disabled fighting for possibilities and in fact succeeding in areas other organizations who have been paid large sums of money by the government have failed doing. You are one of a select few who have hated on it and have made self-advocacy look bad along with the abortion extremist emotionally blackmailing organizations and guilting the public. some just can't handle that myself an d others are going down another path then what you'd like and achieve the successes earned and in ways that are non-confrontational and respectful.

If you want to pursue this I can arrange for a recorded phone call to be aired on YouTube. I'm not going to argue with some vindictive butt over the internet that simply doesn't know what he is talking about and whom himself claims he is not diagnosed. Not only that you wouldn't even quality to benefit from the public work I do if only having A.S.

The reason others don't achieve doing things like I have done is because people like you exist. People that will hate on audacious attempts. Your the type of person I've been prepared for and do not hesitate to confront should you go on record which I dare you. Otherwise you simply don't have the integrity nor honor and just are some hater on the internet that has nothing better to do then hide over the PC and shoot his mouth of with no follow up.

When in doubt: speculation fallacy


I have made you look bad, not self-advocacy. I have criticized your irrelevant and offensive comments made to people who disagree with you and I feel that you are beyond arrogant. That is not an attempt to destroy you.



Vindictive butt. Surely your double-standards are legion.



Guys complaining to you on a little known forum on the internet isn't going to stop your project. What you have been doing is parrying horribly with people who start out making absolutely correct criticism of your brash irreverance and then go on to find out that you are a deleterous jerk who despises all who find fault in him. Maybe you should just go and do your advocacy work, not try convincing all of these people who you clearly think are arrogant and so forth.

When you know nothing about the inner-details nor provide any fact all you set yourself up to being which you clearly are is a hater who means no good will. No you can't stop the project but yes people like you who function this way in advocacy never should be submitted to. that's my point. People like you enable hatred when obviously people like me put their name in the public and stand behind what they do. Bullies toward organizations, hiding behind their PC's and who express nothing but hatred for good positive efforts ought to be spoken against to make an example. Not just my organization but others. Again you have no credibility, solutions or clearly good intentions for individuals in my position and others who need help to be integrated. If you represent at all a mentality of a faction of self-advocates it is shameful to somehow be indirectly associated.

If you desired good outcomes you would provide constructive idea making and not seek to destroy. That's the idea in advocacy that needs to become more popular. Whereas angry advocacy and advocates like you are destroy bridges rather then create new paths to gain potentials. Your kind of advocacy is loosing momentum and fast.

No it wasn't. Your point was that you were somehow being affected by us and that we were holding you back.

Just like how you never stop whining and yelling and attacking and expressing fury at all I do and several others too because they disagree with your charmless insults.

The problem was that you never stop making up i8nsults and lies and irrelevant points. And you should. What I am doing now is pointing out your flaws. Not everyone does everything all the time. Quit binging on your ego.

Why is it that you think I am you as if I am your head. Are you split into two and cannot tell the difference between some alter-ego of yours? This is getting silly. I have beliefs I expressed about the pride and neurodiversity movement and your so hate filled you attack efforts that have both nothing to do with it and as well as try to judge it just making things up. You should have better things to do then be such a poor sport and spending hours angry at a PC screen spewing venom at things that just make your perspective look VERY bad. Try focusing on the issues and reason with it other then getting angry and refusing. your the kind of person that if someone disagrees with you call them names and demean them it's just what you do. It's a problem.

Well that was pulled out of your arse.

Suggesting that the opposition MUST HAVE a mental disorder is pathetic and a great way to lose credibility. THat's thankful: You have none.

Then stop it.

I was attacking your vile hate, not your beliefs.

Well that's because you still haven't segregated your roject from your arrogant attacks on other people. Also no, I am not spewing venom. You are. Quit it.

Hypocrite. What did whether the opposition has autism got anything to do with the issues? What does speculationg on whether people are envious got anything to do with the issues? You caused this, not I.

No: I am pointing out that you're wrong. Deal with it and stop typing. GO and do your project. Quit being insufferably arrogant.

Mr. G your one of those kinds of people that just gets mean when people disagree with you. When they do what you do to them it's a constant pathological dispute where your accusing them of what your doing which is plainly obvious. It's really immature. You don't want constructive debate your want to name call and demean someone to the point they don't reply. If this represents you as a person in real-life then I can understand why you cannot fit in.

Well you're just saying what you're doing to try and protect your mind. I already said what I wanted and intended. If you don't like that then you can complain all you want, you aren't going to get me to budge. Argumentum ad infinitum isn't going to help you. If all you ever to is make barbed remarks about others I can see why everyone here decides that you deserve to be consistently blasted for your petty arrogance!

Only a few Mr. G. Some that have no intention of being constructive. If there is no constructive conclusion only bickering is sought. There will be no solutions to many of the autism social disputes. However based on my study the accusers of pity fall short in public appeal quite profoundly.

What study? Where? I guess just saying the word study just makes it sound more professional. Scrutiny to you is like kryptonite to Superman.

You have an imagination. Again I challenge you to go on the public record you simply keep your imagination as your fantasy.

You are talking nonsense. I chellenge you to stop talking derogatory nonsense and not keep self-indentifying your movement with yourself and so believe that when people are deflating your ego that they are somehow 'harming' progress.

The likes of hatred show themselves in their actions and remarks. Not to help progress or inclusion but to preserve other political agenda's such as abortion, pride and the fit only approach. Compassion boils the skin of some like a vampire is quite allergic to light. You yourself will not make yourself available to the public for my criticism of your perspective against positive change. Simply a lack of integrity and only harsh negativity toward proven constructive change has no pleasurably effect other then stiring the minds of despondency which it is derived originally. Arrogance cannot be wrong, is rigid in views and will not tolerate that which does not easily coincide with it thus it is threatened and intolerant of diversity. The advocacy I conduct is the advocacy of the future whereas your advocacy is of hard feelings and isolationism seeking only division, despondency and harm toward what does not fit it's mold.

[quote="ci"]The likes of hatred show themselves in their actions and remarks.quote]

The likes of ego produce non sequiturs that never stop rambling. Banal in more ways than one. Producing an everlasting cavalcade of frivious comments that always attempt to evade reason and logic because they would spell a death knell to your tyrannical assault on anyone you don't like, who you accuse of everything you do and then never stop trying to escape the hypocrisy of your comments.

Always calling people intolerant whilst you try to defend your ego by self-identifying with your movement and thus calling an attack against your arrogance an attack against progress.