Jaden wrote:
I didn't say it would cause "more" abuse, only that people would then know where to go if they were planning something, whereas before they wouldn't necessarily have the knowledge on where there are those on the spectrum.
I do agree that location is an important role, but it's not as simple as picking a plot of land, a prospector has to check the land for viability, and if it's not stable in any way, you can't build on it. Furthermore, there's not enough data for experts to conclude one way or the other right now because of their criteria, but based on what we know already, we can make an assessment ourselves and determine whether or not we feel society is safe, and a lot of people don't think so, the fact that they're in hiding proves that.
Right now we're all scattered and anonymous, the hardest targets to hit. But if we were all localized in one big community, that would give a face and location to what people have hostile feelings for, and that can lead to very unsafe situations for us.
Granted, however, if we had some kind of security gate that was rather inpenetrable, then sure it might work. But at that point, wouldn't it feel like a garrison?
I don't deny there could be benefits, I'm just pointing out some very real possible problems that I think should be addressed.
Truth be told, I got ahead of myself. My current thinking, which post-dates most of this thread, is towards an "Urban" Aspie community, where there would be a functioning law enforcement system to enforce the rule of law. I don't think "one big community" is feasable or possible at this stage.
_________________
Our first challenge is to create an entire economic infrastructure, from top to bottom, out of whole cloth.
-CEO Nwabudike Morgan, "The Centauri Monopoly"
Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri (Firaxis Games)