Arrogance is not a need and other refuges in audacity

Post Reply New Topic

Please just stop with the mal-interpretation. I am simply arguing to improve your debate. I personally don't take anything seriously in which someone else calls another person a Nazi. It's an insult to human intelligence and people have grown resistant to propaganda and reverse propaganda of this nature in debate.

i appologize since I haven't read beyond the 1st page of this thread, but I think an issue that applies to a great many of us is how to effectivly disagree with people. I know that myself I have a tendency to make arguments about the things I am passionate about that can often result in the message being lost in the mannor that I deliver it.

Actually autism is not a disability and just because autism is included as a quack medical diagnosis still does not make autism a disability. Autism is only a disability because the world we live in refuses to conform to the autistic way of doing things. So is it arrogance to demand that the world change to such a degree as to revolve around the autistic? There is little hope that the autistic will change because autism is so hard wired in the brain. But autistic supremacy teaches that autism in fact a better way of doing things. Once the world accepts autistic supremacy they will become more tolerant of autistics because the world will realize we have a better way. But the other strategy is of compassion and pity which really means we want the world to feel sorry for ourselves. But we do not want pity from the world and we do not want shame from the world. We want the world to be proud of the fact that we are autistics and that we have found genius through autism.

Actually the concept of Nazi ideology was in fact a competition to the Jewish ideology which states that Jews are God's chosen people (Nazi's claim to be the super race) and Jewish ideology states that they should live seperately in their own promised land which is like Heaven on Earth (Nazi's call their homeland the Fatherland).

This question will be a make or break for people in context to autism who call other philosophies pity.

What is the difference between pity and compassion?

With the answer of this question either social political devastation to organizations and groups within a movement individually will occur or be enhanced. The more members of any movement that fail the question will reflect poorly upon the entire sub-movement such as the pride in the general inclusion and equality autism movement. My suggestion is to answer it and have others be prepared to answer it.

I would rather that people feel pity for the way that I was treated rather than feel pity for the way that I am.

What is the difference between pity and compassion?

I think you like to argue to argue because you don't like being perceived wrong in any regard. I don't care if you think your accusation of him being something related to a Nazi including neo-Nazi is correct whereas the vast majority of others are wrong to accuse others of it. I am simply saying you are removing your ability to be perceived well in opinion by using those statements. It does not mean I am blind, not reading or having a supposition simply for making note of the argumentation style.