AnnePande wrote:
If they expect us to change for them, the majority (most people we meet), they should be able to change for a minority. After all, they are the ones considered the wellfunctioning part.
Yet they expect us to do something they wouldn't like to themselves even to a lesser degree than we have to.
(I only write "they" and "we" for the convenience.)
Good example with the deaf and blind etc.
I guess that's the only example available. But the difference is that being deaf and/or blind is something NT people can understand the difference in functioning for. Albeit in a limited way. Trying to explain how perception and thinking is quite different inherently, is a bit harder to illustrate...
I'd just say (with a hint of sarcasm) "I've already been changing myself for the rest of you for years: I've been changing my regular tendency to want to throttle the living daylights out of you when you abuse me for being who I am, or for something I never realised I did, or when you expected me to be able to do something I couldn't, or when I had to make extra effort to fit your rules and didn't get recognition or was even criticised. I think I deserve some payback, but I'm staying reasonable because I'm actually a nice person and realise nothing's perfect. How's about the rest of you then, what's so hard about it for YOU?"
_________________
That 'emulator' concept of processing social data is a new one to me, but makes perfect sense.
"No man can hold what the darkness can sow" - Agents Of Oblivion - Hangman's Daughter.