from the article:
Quote:
“When someone is crying or laughing we do not first observe mechanical movements and, after we have learnt to use a ToM, make predictions about an unobservable inner life.” But this is exactly how autistics are taught mentalistic skills: look at the expression, compare it to the models you have been taught, predict the mental state indicated.
Ummm... so they're saying that non-autistic people do not look at someone's face, see the expression, and figure out the mental state? I had always assumed that's what everyone was doing, just that non-autistic people do it instantly, as if by instinct, while we have to take at least a moment to observe and actively analyze the facial expression.
So if non-autistic people aren't predicting others' mental states by interpreting the facial expressions . . . . how the hell do they do it???? Don't tell me that non-autistic people are psychically intuiting it because a character like Deanna Troi on Star Trek (TNG) who can perceive mental states empathically would not be such a big deal if that's what non-autistic people all do. The entire crew of the Enterprise would be like that.
So how do non-autistic people predict others' mental states if not by observing facial expressions????????
_________________
"In the end, we decide if we're remembered for what happened to us or for what we did with it."
-- Randy K. Milholland
Avatar=WWI propaganda poster promoting victory gardens.