DJRnold wrote:
I still don't understand how anyone could consider AS a "gift".
DJ: AS is a bundle of strengths and weaknesses. The nature of each, and the ratios, is different for each person. The cost/benefit ratio depends on many things, such as your profession. In an area like engineering, in my observation, most of the top engineers are "on the spectrum". That is, when the strength is exploited by appropriate choice of career, the benefit may, in the eye of the beholder, out way the cost.
On the other hand, I know aspies/auties who are miserable. For them the social isolation is very painful, and there is no "plus side".
In my case I love the focus and intensity that I have inherited: it is an almost manic 'high' to, e.g., delve into a textbook on linear algebra. In contrast I find most social events not merely mildly stressful, but largely purposeless.
Penny
P.S. Look at cases retrospectively diagnosed; for example, Glenn Gould. Had he not suffered the costs of AS, he would have also lost the associated benefits. Whether the benefits justified the costs, only Mr Gould could answer. But if my choice were
(1) to be a world-famous pianist with amazing, original insights into Bach and Beethoven, but to suffer Gould’s social limitations, (and what an amazing ego!
Glenn Gould interviewing Glenn Gould on the subject of Glenn Gould makes me laugh as I type this),
or
(2) to be a (neuro-) typical “happily married” but unaccomplished High School music teacher, with the day-to-day stresses of life (salary concerns, school politics, home issues, lack of respect from students, dead-end career, …)
I know I would jump at #1. The extremes of accomplishment seem, to me, to define what it means to be human. In contrast, choice #2 seems to be so dull as to barely be distinguished from the lives of deer in the woods. Any lowly creature can mate, produce offspring, forage, and bring home leaves and nuts.