Magneto wrote:
Because NT's are more likely to follow a single leader, who can hold such a group together. For example, people like you can't seem to see that what we
really have to do is
my idea...
Well actually most times they just don't follow a leader unless they have some sort of socially-recognised obligation to do so. If we were then it would have to be based on reason. That would require aspies to be reasonable however... Well at least it'll quickly weed out unreasonable people.
Magneto wrote:
Trust me, getting Autists to work together and agree on something is harder than getting Enties to, because Enties will just give up their dissent for the sake of social harmony. Yet, even then they usually fail. What makes you think we'd have a better chance?
Because when NTs might have spurious reasons not to we might not. Furthermore we would do something spontaneous without precedent unlike NTs who of course would feel trepidation at rocking the boat. It's a double-edged sword Magneto.
Magneto wrote:
Yes, an Autist neighbourhood would be able to work, I'd imagine, since you're not relying on agreement to keep it together... perhaps, then, if they'd like to start moving and taking over a few adjacent streets?
Exactly! It's a system which bases itself on convenience and plugs in to the present economic environment far more easily.