Chris71 wrote:
The original articles talk about MMS enimas (and there seem to be this stuff in tablet form also) which is based on sodium chlorite.
Maybe I have missed something, but it seemed to me that only the media and kneejerk-parents were labelling the stuff as 'bleach' or chlorine. The active ingredient (NaClO2) that is supposedly in MMS, is ideed very alkaline but when acidified it forms the gas chlorine dioxide (ClO2) which smells the same as chlorine.
They claim that there have been some successes with this treatment ; ok very small numbers, and not a proper scientific trial, so I am not going to take much notice of that.
But let's just say that MMS stuff (which I am pretty sure has been confused with household bleach) , just say, happens to be later proven to help some cases of autism, in properly controlled scientific trials?
Unlikely that would happen. But on the other hand, why do you guys 'know' that it won't work?
It seems very cruel indeed, but then would this suddenly not be cruel anymore if it suddenly gained some scientific evidence of success?
Ok, imagine that instead of what they are doing here, the Protocol involved holding little bells up and tinkling them over the childs head while singing Christmas carols. Thats OK..unlikely to work/a bit whack/pointless but no-one hurt.
The not OK thing is forcing kids to have enemas with chemicals, something that is unproven. Unpleasant at best, dangerous at worst.
And yeah my mind is open to random discoveries, and the odd crazy person being right, but science should always be able to back it up, if not to understand the mechanism then at least repeatable evidence based results. The scientific method is the basis of everything worthwhile we do IMO. I think about this when I am flying in an aeroplane; the wings do not hold the plane up due to wishful thinking and hearsay.