“Vaccine skeptics” appointed to Minnesota Autism council

Page 1 of 1 [ 2 posts ] 

ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,444
Location: Long Island, New York

24 Jan 2019, 5:26 am

Vaccine skeptics on MN Autism Council touch off debate

Quote:
Autism activists are concerned that the appointment of vaccine skeptics to a newly formed state council gives credibility to views the state has struggled to dispel.

The MN Autism Council was formed last fall by Sen. Jim Abeler, R-Anoka, to discuss autism and advise the Legislature on public policy.

Abeler said he wants the group to represent diverse viewpoints and said it will be focused on issues like housing, employment and education, not vaccines.

But some advocates take issue with having people who have vaccine concerns on the council.

Anti-vaccination groups have focused on Minnesota's Somali-American community in the past as they tried to perpetuate the hoax that vaccines cause autism, contributing to a drop in vaccinations and the largest measles outbreak in the state's recent history in 2017.

"Even if it's not something that's discussed or that a policy is going to come out of, giving them this large contingency on this council is dangerous. It's giving credence to a theory that's false," said council member Noah McCourt, an autism self-advocate who also serves on the Minnesota Governor's Council on Developmental Disabilities.

The MN Autism Council met Wednesday and Abeler started the meeting by reiterating that the commission is not pro- or anti-vaccine and said, "I'd suggest we don't discuss that anytime soon, or maybe never."

If their total focus was to come up with a recommendation related to vaccination, yes, it might give me pause," she said. "But on the other hand, it seems this group is focusing more on how they can support families”


Even if autism causation never comes up and they stay on topic views on vaccine causation can affect what the recommendations will look like. If one believes autism is or might be caused by vaccines one is likely to believe the autistic children are normal children who have been deliberatly poisened for profit, and thus need to be rescued. You combine that with the belief there is an ongoing big government, big pharma conspiracy to keep vaccine injury covered up and I find it hard to believe this would not effect the defintion of what help is and increase the willingness to recommend unproven high risk interventions.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


coschristi
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 8 Dec 2014
Age: 57
Gender: Female
Posts: 35
Location: colorado springs, CO

04 Mar 2019, 4:33 am

Anyone who thinks they (autistic children) have been poisoned for profit does not know enough about the issue. Vaccines are a biologic; not technically a pharmaceutical. Pharma is only the kitchen.

They have been poisoned for the greater good. They are an acceptable loss.

Somebody should be skeptical; not one study done regarding biological evidence for safety yet hundreds of epidemiology studies offered as “proof”... The one study that under US law that cannot be considered as evidence or proof of causation is literally the only evidence to be found.