Autism research reported to be shifting from cure
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,095
Location: Long Island, New York
“I think that given the complexity and the variability of the causes and the manifestations of autism, trying to come up with a cure is probably not the right approach,” said autism researcher and psychologist Len Abbeduto, director of the University of California, Davis, MIND Institute in Sacramento.
An estimated 80 percent of autism cases involve genetic factors, and it tends to run in families, but there is no single “autism gene,” Abbeduto explained. In fact, research has shown that more than 100 genes, and maybe upwards of 1,000, may play a role. Researchers also suspect that environmental factors — such as exposures to infectious agents, pesticides or other toxins in pregnancy — may play a role.
“Scientists are investing a lot of work into understanding the genes but we’re also realizing it’s a lot more complicated than anybody ever thought when they started out,” psychologist Ann Wagner, national autism coordinator for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, said.
“We do know that it’s highly genetic, we just haven’t identified how particular kinds of genes might interact with each other or with other factors to cause autism spectrum disorder,” Wagner said. “Autism is such a heterogenous disorder, so it’s highly likely that there are different causes for different kinds of ASD.”
These research developments come amid growing controversy over whether autism even needs a cure. Autism Speaks, an advocacy and research group founded in 2005, removed the word “cure” from its mission statement in 2016.
“In the beginning, [researchers] were looking more for the magic bullet, the magic pill. We were looking for the autism gene, and we thought that would ultimately lead to some kind of cure of autism,” psychologist Thomas Frazier, chief science officer at Autism Speaks in New York, said. “Then we recognized that we were way off base.”
Katarzyna Chawarska, a professor of child psychiatry who leads Yale University’s Autism Center of Excellence in New Haven, Connecticut, is studying signs of autism in babies. “The reason why we are focusing so much on early diagnosis is that it is our hope that by intervening early, we can capitalize on still tremendous brain plasticity that is present in the first, second, third year of life,” she said.
The goal, Chawarska said, is “to help alleviate the symptoms and make sure that every child with autism reaches their full potential.”
Doctors, for instance, would like to minimize any intellectual disabilities and help patients communicate better and improve socials skills. They also want to quickly identify and address any medical conditions that often accompany autism, such as seizures, gastrointestinal problems, sleep disorders, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and anxiety.
Researchers already are seeing positive results with interventions such as behavioral treatments and speech therapy in toddlers.
“One of the things that we do know is that intensive early intervention improves outcomes for kids, so the earlier we can intervene the better,” Abbeduto said.
The idea of curing autism also has become highly controversial with the growth of the neurodiversity movement, which emphasizes respecting and valuing all people for who they are, regardless of whether they are “neurotypical.”
The ‘C word’ raises a lot of attention in the community at large,” said Michael Maloney, executive director of the Organization for Autism Research, a group in Arlington, Virginia, that funds research to improve the daily lives of autistic people. “The largest objection is from people with autism who see themselves as independent and competent and don’t see themselves as broken and needing to be fixed.”
Autism research spending in the U.S. totaled more than $364.4 million in 2016, the latest year for which figures are available, with 80 percent of that money coming from federal agencies and 20 percent from private organizations. Of the spending, just 2 percent went toward autism lifespan issues and 5 percent toward services, according to the government’s Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee. An additional 35 percent went to biology, 24 percent to risk factors, 16 percent to treatment and interventions, 10 percent to infrastructure and surveillance, and 8 percent to screening and diagnosis.
Paul Shattuck, director of the Life Course Outcomes Research Program at the A.J. Drexel Autism Institute in Philadelphia, and a member of the scientific council of the Organization for Autism Research, agrees that not enough attention is paid to adults with autism.
“We’re expending a lot of effort for very young children with autism, but as a society we kind of drop the ball once these young people become young adults,” he said. “There’s really not much there for autistic adults or their families in terms of services or even thinking how to support autistic people across the lifespan.”
I would love to see some more money put into the transition of young adults with autism into the most independent living situation they can get,” Acevedo said. “I would love to see money put into job training, taking the skills that these children have — because everybody has skills, something that they can do — and just really refining it and making these kids marketable to where they can earn some sort of income. There’s something about getting a paycheck and having your name on it as an adult that means so much, and I’m sure it’s going to mean a lot to my kids.”
Sounds great but I am not buying it. The desire for a cure is still there but as mentioned in the article two things have happened. Eugenic elimination has proven too complicated and using the word “cure” has become controversial so “treatment” is used. “Treatment” sounds better and is good when used properly. As I have oft mentioned I strongly suspect the hidden agenda of intervening so early and intensely is into intercept and deflect the autism traits at the early when the brain plasticity is at its highest.
It sounds nice and is nice that research is going into transitioning into adulthood. This is occurring because the people diagnosed as children when the diagnostic criteria was expanded are or are becoming young adults. The same parent organization that advocated for the child offspring are advocating for their young adult offspring. If you are over a certain age you might as well as the anti-vaxxers claim not exist. Besides if you are near or at the traditional retirement age what use are you anyways
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman
The desire for a cure is there because there is a significant number of people with ASD like me who want a cure!
Ive read others on this forum state they want a cure.
ND really have to get their heads round the idea that they dont speak for everyone. Many of us embrace and dont fear scientific research.
Why is the idea of cure so scary to you? Do you not think as a grown adult 50+ i believe, (you stated on anoth thread sorry if im wrong) you would not be able to refuse such treatment?
_________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends upon the unreasonable man."
- George Bernie Shaw
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,095
Location: Long Island, New York
The desire for a cure is there because there is a significant number of people with ASD like me who want a cure!
Ive read others on this forum state they want a cure.
ND really have to get their heads round the idea that they dont speak for everyone. Many of us embrace and dont fear scientific research.
Why is the idea of cure so scary to you? Do you not think as a grown adult 50+ i believe, (you stated on anoth thread sorry if im wrong) you would not be able to refuse such treatment?
Summarizing the other thread I expect a lot of pressure on adults to take the cure from rising insurance rates or unavailable insurance, refusal to hire, general societal view if not professional that refusing a cure is symptomatic of mental illness.
I am 62 years old and expect little or no pressure personally should a cure become available because
1. As noted above autistics of my generation are just not a priority
2. I am on medicaid for physical/medical disabilities not autism
3. Job prospects are little to none because of said disabilities and age discrimination
I do not want a cure because
1. While true becoming NT would make adjusting to change easier becoming NT at this late stage of my life would still probably be too much change.
2. My autistic traits during different stages of my life have impaired and disadvantaged me at greatly varying degrees. When looking back at what worked and did not the environment meaning the people around me, workplace expectations (a lot less social skills expected back in the 80s for certain jobs) were not the only but very important factors in what ever success I was having at the moment. In other words Autism was partly if not mostly a disadvantage not an impairment during many stages of my life.
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman
http://www.kathrynschuler.com/childlanglab/
We are a research lab at the University of Pennsylvania, studying how children learn languages. We’re especially interested in why children seem to be better at language learning than adults are. We want to find out whether there is something different about the way children learn or the way their brains are organized that makes language learning come naturally to them.
We'd love for you to be a part of our work.
http://www.kathrynschuler.com/childlanglab/
This is the sort of basic research that may help understand autism.
First you need to understand how normal people learn. Then you can figure out learning disabilities like autism.
Really? ^ I don't see any progress in using "normal" people to define AS people. We've had that going on for decades. To my very different way of thinking, (from yours) your idea of progress is analogous to proposing studying dogs to define the characteristics of cats.
Do you derive any personal benefit from the outfit you have linked in your post?
In actuality, the US "learning disabled" have a tendency to be socially more adept than even many "neurotypicals."
There is no doubt that there are "learning disabled" people who are also autistic. But autism certainly isn't part and parcel of having a learning disability (the US definition).
There can never be a "cure" for autism because of the fact that autism has many causes and many distinctive treatments based upon the specific causation.
We should veer away from a "cure," anyway, because the "autistic slant on things" has created very many things which "neurotypicals" might never have created.
I suspect that were I younger, I would still refuse a cure. I would not want to be different from who I am in order, for example, to have friends.
That said, the are those impacted more profoundly who might feel differently.
_________________
The river is the melody
And sky is the refrain - Gordon Lightfoot
Going back to the theme of the thread i dont believe the gov care that much about our autistic disabilities to force a cure on high functioning individuals.
We already have a precedent in a curable mental condition in the form of alcohol and drug abuse.
Both of these are curable but the gov cares little about forcing cures on sufferers.
Obviously you will have those with severe autism with a severely shortened lifespan that would simply be given a cure. Is that so bad?
_________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends upon the unreasonable man."
- George Bernie Shaw
Yes of course but really referring to government intent. The government dont care and wont intervene if someone wants to drink themseves to death.
The same is true with illegal substances (excluding possession of ) even though they are against the law.
Just think many over exaggerate just how much their gov cares about their social difficulties, lack of eye contact etc...
If your high functioning enough you shouldnt fear new treatments because there will always be a place in society or workplace for such people.
If an individual has severe disabilities and poor life quality though maybe they should question what they have to gain from wanting to maintain the status quo?
_________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends upon the unreasonable man."
- George Bernie Shaw
The goal, Chawarska said, is “to help alleviate the symptoms and make sure that every child with autism reaches their full potential.”
Doctors, for instance, would like to minimize any intellectual disabilities and help patients communicate better and improve social skills. They also want to quickly identify and address any medical conditions that often accompany autism, such as seizures, gastrointestinal problems, sleep disorders, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and anxiety.
Researchers already are seeing positive results with interventions such as behavioral treatments and speech therapy in toddlers.
Good to see at least a little bit of concern about the kids' cognitive development, a.k.a. "minimize any intellectual disabilities." Alas I don't see any mention here of identifying and encouraging the kids' strengths -- which, IMO, would likely be the best way to "minimize any intellectual disabilities." Alas I also don't see any concern about possible bad side-effects of the "behavioral interventions."
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Research survey: Discover new presentations of autism |
06 Dec 2024, 12:22 am |
I want to be a research technician and may drop my PhD |
25 Nov 2024, 1:28 pm |
Research on Self Identification - Call for Participants |
26 Sep 2024, 6:08 am |
Having Autism |
23 Nov 2024, 9:49 am |