Neurodiversity Studies - free book

Post Reply New Topic

https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9780429322297

Thank you Mrs Peel. Here's a link that seems to be free!

chapter Chapter 2|12 pages
Language games used to construct autism as pathology
WithNick Chown

According to the work of Ludwig Wittgenstein, we risk misunderstanding something as a result of failing to notice logical errors in language used to describe it. In this chapter I introduce and discuss examples of errors that appear to have been difficult for neurotypical people to identify. I argue that an autistically neurodivergent perspective on language use is valuable in identifying the logical errors in language that concerned Wittgenstein. I also argue that a failure of neurotypical society to appreciate that societal language games are, by definition, neurotypical language games can have adverse consequences where autism is concerned because of the inevitability of cultural biases in favour of neurotypicality. Some of these adverse consequences relate to ethical consideration of research to cure/prevent autism.

chapter Chapter 4|16 pages
Neurodiversity, disability, wellbeing
WithRobert Chapman

Cognitive disability has traditionally been framed through a medical model, which takes individual impairment to be the primary cause of distress and disablement among the disabled. This is often accompanied by the notion that cognitive disability is inherently at odds with living a good life. In recent decades neurodiversity paradigm proponents have contested this, typically, albeit not necessarily, by drawing on various forms of the social model of disability to show that distress and disablement are the product of wider social factors more than individual impairments. Here I argue that the concept of impairment, which is central to both these models, both runs into conceptual problems and contradicts the very concept of neurodiversity. Moreover, neither model manages to strike a nuanced balance between admitting that cognitive disability can be accompanied by varying degrees of individual hardship, and nonetheless recognising that it is compatible with living a good life. I introduce the recently proposed value-neutral model. I argue that this alternative can both avoid the problems just noted and may prove more useful for conceptualising cognitive disability and its relationship with wellbeing.