auntblabby wrote:
in my last aspie group, it was divided between those with renumerative talents [programming, maths, hard sciences] and those of us lacking any earthly talents. when the talented ones went away to join others of like mind, what was left of the group seemed to evaporate.
Did the talented ones form a new separate group, or did they just decide to hang out informally with similar friends?
auntblabby wrote:
i was clueless as to what to do about this. a lot of the other members didn't really want to interact, to be honest, preferring to bury their noses in their respective smartphones. a brief rule about no smartphones on the table resulted in sullen silence. threw up hands.
They must have wanted SOME interaction, or they wouldn't have bothered to attend in the first place.
Did your group meetings have any kind of structure? Your description gives me the impression that it didn't. (Correct me if I'm wrong.) If there were more structure, perhaps the members would have had more of an idea of what kinds of things to say and when? For me, and for many autistic people, the hardest kind of social situation is an unstructured, unfocused group conversation.
The Aspies for Social Success support group meetings begin with a round of introductions, which is followed by a discussion on a pre-announced topic/"theme". Discussion is not limited to the topic, but the topic provides a jumping-off point. (Personally I would prefer that the discussion be MORE focused on the topic than it is, but the amount of structure it does have is apparently good enough for most attendees and good enough to keep the group going.)
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.