macushla wrote:
If someone has a medical condition they should be wearing a bracelet or necklace stating it.
Police aren't mind readers.
I had to call the police on a guy in my building once. The first thing they asked me was if he had a gun or was known to be violent.
If he didn't have a history of being violent I probably wouldn't have called the cops on him.
Try to imagine going to work everyday with a major chance of getting shot at or bit while trying to handcuff raving 300 pound drunks et cetera.
The police should be able to clearly differentiate between a dangerous potential assailant, and someone having a seizure. Also, even people ON drugs or beer are rarely dangerous enough to merit zapping. Nor do they even look like they might be. Only a minority are actually dangerous, and of that minority very few are capable of causing real harm to people ostensibly trained in how to deal with them. Trust me.. I do it myself on a daily basis, and I see British police officers deal with drunks nightly. Never EVER seen them need to resort to tazers, pepper sprays, or even that much force.. mostly because they are sober, and it simply IS NOT NEEDED. Simple restraint techniques, a calm attitude and demeanour, speaking clearly and making no threatening motions. Works like a dream. Its even possible to lead drunks away just be clever distraction.
A seizure and a dangerous drunk/druggy are two wholly different things, and if your police cannot recognise that, they are seriously undertrained. Tell me, do US police weapons have "This End Towards Assailant" printed on the casing anywhere?
_________________
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart,
that you can't take part" [Mario Savo, 1964]