Page 1 of 1 [ 6 posts ] 

sinsboldly
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Nov 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,488
Location: Bandon-by-the-Sea, Oregon

08 Jan 2009, 1:24 am

Dear President-elect Obama:
On behalf of the Autistic Self-Advocacy Network, we would like to provide your office with the attached policy
recommendations addressing our top three public policy priorities for the new administration, as per the request
made by your transition team. The Autistic Self-Advocacy Network is an international civil rights advocacy
organization of autistic people across the lifespan advocating for our community in public policy, service-delivery,
research and media representation. Our organization is unique amongst autism advocacy groups in that we are run
entirely by and for autistic people, the all too often unheard stakeholder in autism policy.
We want to applaud your efforts to ensure that this will be a fully inclusive and transparent transition process and
hope that the same spirit will govern the upcoming administration. As 2009 begins, autistic people across the
country and the world continue to face many obstacles preventing the full realization of quality of life,
communication, rights and opportunity. The public conversation about autism continues to be one that is held
largely without autistic people, who should be the central stakeholder. It is necessary to implement the central tenet
of the disability rights movement, “Nothing About Us, Without Us,” in our community. Furthermore, numerous
service-delivery and rights protection infrastructures designed to protect individuals with disabilities are not yet
proficient at meeting the needs of autistic people across the lifespan. This must change. At the same time, it is also
important that we not disconnect autism issues from the values and principles of the cross-disability rights
movement. With that in mind, we have been active participants in the consumer-led Disability Leaders Caucus
alongside other disability rights organizations such as the American Association of People with Disabilities, the
National Coalition for Disability Rights, the Special Olympics and other groups. We wholeheartedly endorse and are
proud to have helped to develop the recommendations of that coalition alongside our own more specific
recommendations focusing on the top three priorities of the autistic community.
Our top three priority areas are as follows:
1. Support and Empower Autistic Adults
2. End School Abuse and Ensure a Free and Appropriate Public Education for All Students on the
Autism Spectrum
3. Balance the Research Agenda to Support Quality of Life
We have included a one page description of each priority area as well as recommendations on specific means of
policy implementation. Please feel free to write to us if you have any follow up questions and we look forward to
continuing to be a part of the policy process under the incoming Obama Administration.
Regards,
Ari Ne'eman
President
The Autistic Self Advocacy Network
1660 L Street, NW, Suite 700
Washington, DC 20036
http://www.autisticadvocacy.org
[email protected]
732.763.5530
Support and Empower Autistic Adults:
Current CDC statistics estimate the ratio of autism spectrum diagnoses amongst children at 1 in every 150. Systems
designed to meet the needs of adults with disabilities are unprepared to deal with the large numbers of identified
students on the autism spectrum preparing to transition into secondary and post-secondary environments. We must
work to help high schools and adult services infrastructures meet the needs of autistic adults.
Furthermore, a growing number of studies analyzing factors such as diagnostic trends, IDEA statistics and other
factors suggest that rather than an "autism epidemic" what we are seeing is increasingly accurate diagnosis of
previously un- or mis-identified individuals due to better diagnostic criteria and awareness. As such, there exists a
large population of un-diagnosed or only recently diagnosed autistic adults whose needs must be met.
We recommend the following:
▪ Ensure that autism health insurance reform addresses the needs of all autistic people – including coverage of
methodologies such as speech and occupational therapy and Augmentative and Alternative Communication
(AAC), as well as adult needs such as mental health services and vocational counseling programs.
▪ Increase capacity of existing disability service-delivery and rights protection infrastructures to meet the needs of
adults on the autism spectrum by:
-Ensuring that future re-authorizations of the DD Bill of Rights Act, the Rehab Act, IDEA and other major
disability service-delivery and rights protection laws incorporate language requiring covered infrastructures
to increase capacity and expertise needed to serve individuals on the autism spectrum across the lifespan.
-Work with Congress to Pass and Implement an Emerging Needs Protection & Advocacy Program as well
as other initiatives discussed in Sen. Clinton’s Expanding Promise for Individuals with Autism Act. (S.937)
-Fund pilot programs to develop models for emulation on issues like employment supports, housing, social
supports, post-secondary transition, community integration and other issues of importance to autistic adults.
-Appoint individuals knowledgeable in autism spectrum issues to lead OSERS, OSEP, ODEP, the DOJ
Disability Rights Section and the EEOC.
▪ Aggressively enforce disability discrimination laws in regards to autistic people across the lifespan.
-Direct the EEOC and DOJ to develop technical assistance materials outlining the rights of and frequent
accommodations for autistic adults in contexts such as employment and interaction with police.
-Fund an extensive outreach program to inform autistic adults and families about relevant rights.
-Convene an inter-agency advisory group on the civil rights of autistic people across the lifespan, including
representatives from self-advocacy and family organizations.
▪ Work to address the lack of physicians knowledgeable enough to accurately diagnose adults on the autism
spectrum by providing funding to improve medical education about the autism spectrum across the lifespan.
▪ Provide states with incentives to address the needs of autistic adults of all kinds across the lifespan. Models to
explore include the Pennsylvania Bureau of Autism Services and the Florida CARD system.
▪Ensure that all task forces, commissions, committees and other entities tasked with making autism policy include
substantial representation from autistic self-advocates.
End School Abuse and Ensure a Free and Appropriate Public Education for All Students on the Autism
Spectrum
Our nation is facing a critical civil and human rights issue with respect to the education of students on the autism
spectrum. The frequent use of restraints, aversives and seclusion place students with disabilities, including those on
the autism spectrum, in the position of being abused in the name of treatment. Students with disabilities are at risk
and students on the autism spectrum, who often have significant challenges in communication and social interaction,
are at particular risk of many kinds of abuse. States across the country continue to allow methods that include prone
restraint, electric shock, slapping, seclusion and other unethical and dangerous methods. This must end.
Despite a requirement that all students with disabilities be educated in the “least restrictive environment”, students
on the autism spectrum continue to face rates of school segregation over three times higher than those faced by other
students with disabilities. For too many students, the promise of inclusion remains far away. Not only has
enforcement of relevant special education law civil rights provisions been lax to non-existent in many jurisdictions,
but recent judicial decisions have weakened the ability of parents to fight for the rights of their children.
We recommend the following:
▪ All federal laws and regulations which protect persons - of all ages - with disabilities from abuse in institutional
and treatment settings must also be applied to schools - all schools: public, private, day, residential.
-Issue an Executive Order implementing circuit court decisions stating that the Developmental Disabilities
Bill of Rights Act applies to schools and should be enforced through all available measures. Clarify that
aversives, seclusion and non-emergency restraint are in violation of the DD Bill of Rights Act.
-Place responsibility and budget funds for enforcement of laws protecting students with disabilities from
abuse in HHS rather than USDOE, as HHS is better equipped to ensure proper enforcement.
-Fully fund the Protection & Advocacy (P&A) system. Have USDOE instruct state DOEs not to retaliate in
funding against P&A agencies for seeking to enforce the law against schools that violate it.
▪ Transfer responsibility and budget for enforcement of IDEA complaints from USDOE Office of Civil Rights to
the USDOJ Civil Rights Divison. Failing this, transfer responsibility for complaints including acts of retaliation
and intimidation against parents by school districts to USDOJ to address the more egregious illegal activity.
▪ Ensure that IDEA is fully funded and that implementation of said full funding comes along with program and
fiscal audits of IDEA funds to ensure effectiveness, quality and freedom from abuse in implementation.
Precedent for program and fiscal audits of federal education funds exists from similar auditing in NCLB.
▪ Create a National Technical Assistance Center on Autism Education within USDOE to provide technical
assistance to school districts on effective and inclusive educational practices for students on the autism spectrum
and to develop teacher training programs to help prepare teachers for all subjects and grades on the needs of
students on the autism spectrum.
▪ Restore IDEA’s due process rights, allow reimbursement to prevailing families for expert fees, and place the
burden of proof in IDEA challenges on school districts.
▪ Instruct the Office of Special Education Programs to issue a “Dear Colleague:” letter clarifying that students
should be eligible for an Individualized Educational Plan on the basis of social as well as academic challenges.
▪ Instruct USDOE to embark upon a nation-wide bullying prevention program through the use of technical
assistance to schools and the funding of studies on effective means to reduce bullying, harassment and violence.
Balance the Autism Research Agenda to Support Quality of Life
The autism research agenda has been near-exclusively focused on causation and cure, two priorities out of step with
the needs and desires of the autistic community. In the year 2008, only approximately 1% of the NIMH autism
research budget was allocated towards services-research. In the private foundation sector, the situation is similar,
with autism services and education research vastly underfunded in favor of causation and cure research with little
impact on quality of life. The priorities reflected in the current autism research agenda send a concerning message.
Research that focuses on discovering and eliminating autism both enters the dangerous and unethical realm of
eugenics and avoids addressing the social barriers that autistic people face that prevent quality of life and full
participation and inclusion in society at large. Balancing the autism research agenda to focus on quality of life will
pay dividends by providing evidence on the most effective methods of delivering services and providing for an
effective education across the lifespan. Such a research agenda would compliment other aspects of federal disability
policy, such as de-institutionalization mandated under Olmstead v. L.C., the IDEA and NCLB requirements for
evidence- and research-based methodologies, the IDEA “Least Restrictive Environment” right and increased
numbers of individuals with disabilities, including the autism spectrum, in the workforce.
We recommend the following:
▪ Require that no less than half of the federal autism research budget across all departments and agencies,
including NIH, CDC, HRSA, HHS, DOL and others, be allocated towards services-research.
▪ Pursue a vigorous quality of life autism research agenda focused on issues such as improved service-delivery
methodologies, social barriers to full participation and quality of life, effective systems change models, means of
effectively and respectfully addressing social, behavioral, emotional and other challenges, empowering
communication and other priorities.
▪ Mandate that the Inter-Agency Autism Coordinating Committee (IACC) include representation from autistic
self-advocacy organizations, such as the Autistic Self-Advocacy Network, and that there exist parity between the
number of parent, provider and self-advocate representatives in the public membership to the IACC.
▪ Fund research into Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) options for autistic people across the
lifespan, including Assistive Technology, so as to empower all autistic people to meaningfully communicate.
▪ Establish a moratorium on federally funded autism-related genetics research until ethical concerns
surrounding a possible pre-natal test and eugenic abortion are addressed to the satisfaction of the autistic
community.
▪ Allocate no less than one third of the federal autism research agenda towards the needs of adults on the autism
spectrum, addressing the near total lack of research funding towards the needs of this population to date.
▪Fund Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) models including autistic self-advocates as full
partners at every stage of the research process, from topic selection to study design and implementation. Look to
existing projects as models, such as the Academic Autistic Spectrum Partnership in Research and Education
(AASPIRE – http://www.aaspireproject.org).
▪ Provide for Student Loan Forgiveness for services-related and quality of life/participation-based researchers
that is comparable to the loan forgiveness offered for researchers who work on basic science research.
▪ Look to research funded by the National Institute of Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR) as a
model for autism research priorities.

http://www.autisticadvocacy.org/documen ... ations.pdf


_________________
Alis volat propriis
State Motto of Oregon


messygeek
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 23 Nov 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 106

08 Jan 2009, 1:59 am

Ari needs to go suck on a popsickle or something.



Woodpecker
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Oct 2008
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,625
Location: Europe

08 Jan 2009, 6:08 am

While I do not live in the US, I do agree with most of what was written in the letter.

I most strongly agree with the sections on making it clear that the aspie / autie community should be a stakeholder whose should be consulted when policy is made.

Also the section on research is very good, I think that the ethics boards which approve or disapprove of autism related research should have at least one member on them who is from the autism / aspie community. A autism organisation should not be able to take this role, many of us would hold the view that Autism Speaks as an organisation should not be allowed to send a person to sit in this capacity on such a panel but I think that a HFA or AS person from the Autistic Self-Advocacy Network or a related organisation should be allowed to sit on the panel.

As well as the ethics board a HFA or AS person should be recruited to the panel which makes the "fund / do not fund" choice for projects relating to autism / aspergers. I would suggest that that person should be a university academic.

Such a person could reduce the likelyhood of the panel approving a research program which is harmful to the interests of the autistic community.


_________________
Health is a state of physical, mental and social wellbeing and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity :alien: I am not a jigsaw, I am a free man !

Diagnosed under the DSM5 rules with autism spectrum disorder, under DSM4 psychologist said would have been AS (299.80) but I suspect that I am somewhere between 299.80 and 299.00 (Autism) under DSM4.


ASPowerations
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 8 Dec 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 69
Location: Manhattan, NY

08 Jan 2009, 11:22 am

messygeek wrote:
Ari needs to go suck on a popsickle or something.


What makes you say that?


_________________
The geeks shall rise!!


messygeek
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 23 Nov 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 106

08 Jan 2009, 11:38 am

ASPowerations wrote:
messygeek wrote:
Ari needs to go suck on a popsickle or something.


What makes you say that?


Ari is the self elected president of something that Advocates for a group of people whom he is not accountable to. While he does have the condition the way his organization is set up is no better then Autism Speaks.



KenG
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2006
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,126
Location: Israel

08 Jan 2009, 1:05 pm

messygeek wrote:
Ari is the self elected president of something that Advocates for a group of people whom he is not accountable to. While he does have the condition the way his organization is set up is no better then Autism Speaks.
Ari is accountable to ASAN's membership. After you join ASAN, he will be accountable to you. In addition, you could nominate yourself as ASAN's new president and call for general elections among ASAN's membership.
The more autistics join ASAN, the more it will become a representative organization of the wider autistic community.
(Alternatively, you could start a competing autistic self-advocacy organization, but I see no need for that).


_________________
AUsome Conference -- Autistic-run conference in Ireland
https://konfidentkidz.ie/seo/autism-tra ... onference/
AUTSCAPE -- Autistic-run conference and retreat in the UK
http://www.autscape.org/