kraftiekortie wrote:
In order for this to be feasible, the pictures would have to be the same quality as something like MRIs. Or at least 3-dimensional.
A 2-dimensional picture of a mole just won’t do it.
No, this is fallacy. The pictures need to be about the same quality as pictures in textbooks and tests they used in training how to differentiate ordinary, atypical and malignant moles. They can stare at photos as long as they need, there is no awkwardness or pressure, they can zoom in and out, tweak enhancement parameters, they can go back to take another look any time if they have a new idea or want to double check, they can run recognition software and compare pictures, ask opinion of their colleagues any time. None of that is possible when you are limited to like 30 seconds glance at a mole on the body of a patient in person.
kraftiekortie wrote:
Some people just like contact with other humans. We have to live with that. We have to accept that fact.
Yes, this is what I call emotional and irrational.