calandale wrote:
Sylvius wrote:
richardbenson wrote:
this is true! a throwback to ty cobb
More of a Wee Willie Keeler, I think.
Keeler, incidentally, held the record for most singles in one season (206 in 1898) until Ichiro broke that in 2004 (225 singles). Also, Keeler had 8 consecutive 200 hit seasons, also the major-league record. Ichiro has 6 straight to start his career (should make it 7 sometime in early September).
Though, your comparison is quite good. The American League record for most 200 hit seasons (consecutive or not) is 9, held by Ty Cobb (Pete Rose holds the major league record with 10).
But you can't compare them.
Ichiro gets at least 100 extra
at bats a year.
Let's investigate that, shall we?
You mentioned at-bats, but plate appearances is probably the more relevant measure. Let's not penalise either player for producing things other than hits or outs.
Over his 8 200 hit seasons, Keeler averaged 628 PA/season. Over Ichiro's 6 200-hit seasons, he has averaged 746 PA/season, so Ichiro has had, on average 19% more plate appearances.
There are a bunch of reasons for this. First, Ichiro plays a longer season. Also, Ichiro plays in an era where more runs are scored overall, which means games last long and he gets more plate appearances per game than Keeler would have.
But the circumstances don't all benefit Ichiro. Ichiro's batting average and on-base percentage over his 6 seasons are .331 and .379 respectively, while Keeler's are .378 and .430. But Keeler's are less remarkable than they appear relative to the league average. Ichiro's league (the American League 2001-2006) posted a batting average of .267, while Keeler's league (the National League 1894-1901) posted an average BA of .286, so Keeler only beats Ichiro relative to the league average by 28 points rather than the 47 points it first appears. 28 points is a difference of 16 hits over 600 at-bats.
Plus, the defenders of Keeler's era wore much smaller gloves, plus he played in a segregated game and thus only faced pitchers drawn from a much smaller pool of possible competitors. In addition, Keeler spent most of his career as a corner outfielder, which is a less demanding defensive position that Ichiro's centerfield (which admittedly he just switched to this season).
If you correct for defense and era, they're very similar players. Someone's actually already done this for us.
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/dt/keelewi01.php
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/dt/suzukic01.php
Adjusted for all time, Ichiro averages 34.7 batting runs above average in his 6 200-hit seasons, while Keeler averages only 31 batting runs above average. Adding defence to the equation, Ichiro averaged 9.25 wins above replacement position (WARP3 - adjusted for all-time) over his 6 seasons, while Keeler managed only 8.85 WARP3/season, on average.
They're remarkably similar players.