Page 1 of 1 [ 7 posts ] 


Are you in favor of the dsm v
Yes 47%  47%  [ 7 ]
No 53%  53%  [ 8 ]
Total votes : 15

pigsrock
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 1 Feb 2009
Age: 28
Gender: Female
Posts: 269
Location: st.louis

30 Apr 2014, 2:30 pm

I am not


_________________
I am a 26 year old Launch code Graduate with level 1 autism Ehlers Danlos syndrome and trisomy 12p, I like cubing, math, genetics, JavaScript, Pigs, my favorite medical procedure is a thoracotomy.


Raziel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Oct 2011
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,616
Location: Europe

30 Apr 2014, 4:25 pm

It depends which area.
Personality disorders: no
Autism spectrum disorders: mostly yes
Social communication disorder: no
ADHD: mostly yes
...


_________________
"I'm astounded by people who want to 'know' the universe when it's hard enough to find your way around Chinatown." - Woody Allen


justkillingtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,967
Location: Washington, D.C.

30 Apr 2014, 4:56 pm

I enjoy all the DSMs because I think it is really interesting to see how behavior is categorized. Since I am scent-oriented, I have to say the DSM-5 smells really good - better than DSM 3 and 4 :wink:


_________________
Impermanence.


OddDuckNash99
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,562

01 May 2014, 7:15 am

I think a lot of the changes are dumb. I can't believe they took OCD out of the anxiety disorders. I'm all for adding an OC spectrum category, but OCD itself has its roots in anxiety, and taking it out of the anxiety disorder categories makes little sense. I also think it's dumb that they removed the "mood disorders" category. Why do bipolar disorders need to be all by themselves? Depression is part and parcel of bipolar disorders, so why separate unipolar depression and bipolar disorder? :roll:


_________________
Helinger: Now, what do you see, John?
Nash: Recognition...
Helinger: Well, try seeing accomplishment!
Nash: Is there a difference?


KingdomOfRats
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,833
Location: f'ton,manchester UK

01 May 2014, 9:36 pm

am glad of the DSM V.

am greatful to be in the UK and diagnosed with 'learning disability' rather than mental retardation, its a truly outdated,offensive,incorret and very dehumanising term that doesnt even begin to represent our difficulties;we have a mental capacity that is significantly limited compared to average,and this has an impact on our basic functioning, its like comparing a computer dual processor to a single processor; obviously the dual processor will be able to do more but it doesnt mean the single processor is slow,it just cant handle complex stuff and much information very well like the average dual processor.

am not so glad that one year later;much of the autistic community have adapted to the ASD changes in the DSM very well but still use 'mental retardation' because they arent directly affected by it and think those of us who hate the term hate it because of political correctness.


_________________
>severely autistic.
>>the residential autist; http://theresidentialautist.blogspot.co.uk
blogging from the view of an ex institutionalised autism/ID activist now in community care.
>>>help to keep bullying off our community,report it!


pigsrock
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 1 Feb 2009
Age: 28
Gender: Female
Posts: 269
Location: st.louis

03 May 2014, 10:58 am

Although I do like how they changed "mental retardation" to intelectually disabled.


_________________
I am a 26 year old Launch code Graduate with level 1 autism Ehlers Danlos syndrome and trisomy 12p, I like cubing, math, genetics, JavaScript, Pigs, my favorite medical procedure is a thoracotomy.


Lumi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Sep 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,513
Location: Positive-minded

07 May 2014, 7:00 pm

Yes for ASD and intellectual disability. Confused on the other ones.


_________________
Slytherin/Thunderbird