Page 4 of 13 [ 196 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 13  Next

King_oni
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 232
Location: The Netherlands

05 Dec 2014, 8:03 pm

I would. Though; as with my taste in women, I have my preferences visually. So I guess it's a bit of "as long as she's pretty". As someone already pointed out in a sense "I'm not attracted to women with masculine features". Well, maybe I am to some extent...

That said; I do want to stress that I feel that getting along on a personal level and having matching interests is a good start, having physical attraction comes into play after that. If I can get along fine with someone on all those levels, I'm not going to be fussy about what might be going on down there (I think; never had any experiences with that).

But I suppose, as something I pointed out in another thread on sexual preference; I think I'm heteroflexible in that regard. I just have no interest in men or strong masculine features.



beneficii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,245

05 Dec 2014, 9:50 pm

I would not expect a heterosexual male to show any interest in me.


_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin


BorgPrince
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 6 Dec 2011
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 141
Location: Neptune

06 Dec 2014, 2:15 am

I personally wouldn't become involved romantically with a transsexual. There is more to attraction than psychological construction; physical construction matters as well. A transwoman is still physically a man, and a transman is still physically a woman. There is no method that can TRULY alter this fact.



King_oni
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 232
Location: The Netherlands

06 Dec 2014, 2:46 am

The topic of TG people brings me up to something else; What exactly is it that people think is unattractive to them? Is it a woman with masculine features (or in other cases, a man with feminine features).

Or is it merely the idea that, if you get involved with someone, that there might be something else going on down there which you have no interest in and would make you feel you're questioning your sexuality and preferences?

A friend of mine doesn't have any interest in TG people. He thinks most, if not all, look way too masculine. Then I showed him a picture of an adult TG star, just out of the blue, without telling him what the deal was. The topic of transgender didn't even come up at that moment. Sometimes I just browse Tumblr if my friend is around and we end up checking out some naked women for the heck of it; nothing wrong with 2 guys having beers and checking the meat market once in a while. By now I think that's what Tumblr is for, lol. Anyway; so I showed him a picture of her face, her upper body and all and asked him "would you tap that?" and right away he said "she's pretty cute". So then I showed him another pic of her, revealing she's actually a TG performer. I never saw someone so confused, lol. (the performer in question is Sarina Valentina; preference in women and looks aside, though one can argue she has a better porn look than some born females in the industry)

I also remember once having a discussion with someone about how he pointed out that he's fine with it as long as it has female private parts. I'll just say this; Buck Angel.

I'll show myself out again 8)



Magneto
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jun 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,086
Location: Blighty

06 Dec 2014, 5:00 am

BorgPrince wrote:
I personally wouldn't become involved romantically with a transsexual. There is more to attraction than psychological construction; physical construction matters as well. A transwoman is still physically a man, and a transman is still physically a woman. There is no method that can TRULY alter this fact.

What, exactly, do you mean by "physically"? If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck...



b9
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,003
Location: australia

06 Dec 2014, 5:25 am

Magneto wrote:
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck...
then it still may be a deformed goose.



Magneto
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jun 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,086
Location: Blighty

06 Dec 2014, 8:18 am

Do you check every apparent mallard you see, in case it's a deformed goose?



b9
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,003
Location: australia

06 Dec 2014, 8:46 am

Magneto wrote:
Do you check every apparent mallard you see, in case it's a deformed goose?

thankfully i am not interested in ducks in that way, so i would not bother.



Magneto
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jun 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,086
Location: Blighty

06 Dec 2014, 10:16 am

Who said anything about a duck fetish? If you saw a being that looks like a mallard, would you consider it to be a mallard, or would you say "oh, but it might be a goose"...

But if you find a woman attractive, you will check to see if she's trans, and if so will retcon yourself to have never found her attractive? :?



pjhighfield
Butterfly
Butterfly

User avatar

Joined: 10 Sep 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 16
Location: United States of America

06 Dec 2014, 11:24 am

I would and I wouldn't... Haven't been in enough relationships to give a true opinion.



wigglyspider
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Apr 2009
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,306
Location: WA, USA

06 Dec 2014, 2:14 pm

I have already. I think that I would only date a MTF that had not gotten bottom surgery though, (that's what she was) because I would not be sexually attracted to the others. I find the current surgically constructed penises unsatisfactory... or I would consider getting one myself. And I have no interested in vaginas. Er... vaginae.


_________________
"You gotta keep making decisions, even if they're wrong decisions, you know. If you don't make decisions, you're stuffed."
- Joe Simpson


BorgPrince
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 6 Dec 2011
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 141
Location: Neptune

06 Dec 2014, 7:33 pm

Magneto wrote:
BorgPrince wrote:
I personally wouldn't become involved romantically with a transsexual. There is more to attraction than psychological construction; physical construction matters as well. A transwoman is still physically a man, and a transman is still physically a woman. There is no method that can TRULY alter this fact.

What, exactly, do you mean by "physically"? If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck...


False analogy. A post-op transsexual may "look like a duck," but beyond that, it fails to meet the remaining criteria for being a duck. The limitations of modern medical technology only allow for, at best, a superficial modification of the human form. There is no means of actually altering one's sex. That is pure science fiction. To attempt to do so would merely render you, as b9 somewhat crudely put it, a "deformed goose."



ForeignObject
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 15 Nov 2014
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 208
Location: Underneath the ring.

06 Dec 2014, 11:55 pm

King_oni wrote:
The topic of TG people brings me up to something else; What exactly is it that people think is unattractive to them? Is it a woman with masculine features (or in other cases, a man with feminine features).


This.

Most straight people want men with heavy masculine features and women with heavy effeminate features.

I got told that I was too effeminate for gay men and too masculine for straight men, so that is why I choose bisexual men for relationships. They tend to be the ones that find us transgendered and transsexual people attractive.


_________________
Yes, I am transgendered! How'd you know?


Magneto
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jun 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,086
Location: Blighty

07 Dec 2014, 7:24 am

BorgPrince wrote:
Magneto wrote:
BorgPrince wrote:
I personally wouldn't become involved romantically with a transsexual. There is more to attraction than psychological construction; physical construction matters as well. A transwoman is still physically a man, and a transman is still physically a woman. There is no method that can TRULY alter this fact.

What, exactly, do you mean by "physically"? If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck...


False analogy. A post-op transsexual may "look like a duck," but beyond that, it fails to meet the remaining criteria for being a duck. The limitations of modern medical technology only allow for, at best, a superficial modification of the human form. There is no means of actually altering one's sex. That is pure science fiction. To attempt to do so would merely render you, as b9 somewhat crudely put it, a "deformed goose."

What, then, do you mean by sex?



BorgPrince
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 6 Dec 2011
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 141
Location: Neptune

07 Dec 2014, 7:06 pm

Magneto wrote:
What, then, do you mean by sex?


How about we focus on your definition of sex, since clearly your intention is to destroy mine.



ForeignObject
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 15 Nov 2014
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 208
Location: Underneath the ring.

07 Dec 2014, 9:14 pm

Image

That escalated quickly.


_________________
Yes, I am transgendered! How'd you know?