jk1 wrote:
I can relate to the initiator of the thread.
I am a male and I feel gender policing against men are worse. After all when people talk about equality, they tend to have women's interests in mind rather than both. So the term "equality" is used so that women benefit from it. For example, I noticed that at work, when a man says "It's a ladys' task", he gets in serious trouble for being sexist, but there are many tasks that only men have to do as if there's no such thing as gender equality. If a man complains about that, some will disapprove of him for being "unmanly". Whatever the cause of this sort of double standards, this is pure sexism in a true sense. There are other examples I could mention, but I don't to avoid being lengthy.
I think the liberation from gender roles has happened to a much greater extent for women than for men. That's why people are not even aware of a lot of sex discrimination against men. And those men who are aware of it cannot really say it because the society disapproves of them as being unmanly, whereas a woman who "stands up for women's rights" are regarded as "brave". So, at the moment men don't even have the means for achieving equality and liberation from gender role.
I want to write a bit more, but I don't want to be too lengthy. So I stop here.
I don't think women were liberated in a sense of having gained anything, or much more than you can gain from advancing yourself by trodding on others. The "liberation" of women did not come from any real progress other than the denigration of men, and that only goes so far. Many women reap what they sow on this, but won't let go of the present system, and get pretty much what they are bargaining for.