Actually, I didn't know it, and was taking the writing for granted. Apologies for the confusion.
I have often wondered if the confusion which OP has experienced is a byproduct of an overemphasis of stereotypical "Gender Roles."
Perhaps it is in the boundaries that we are most free? I am "bound by gender roles" only in the sense that I am a man. Which means that I am, among many things, supposed to be a breadwinner/laborer/crafter/artist, chaste (to protect women)--sounds archaic but so are gender roles--capable of functioning in this capacity in society, etc. These roles are restrictive in a sense that the feathers on the arrow restrict its flight--directly to the bullseye of the target, winning the match. Or the rails that the locomotive runs on keep it in the same direction, but make it free to do its job. I heard this argument in some form or another from someone I forgot, but it did make sense at least.
Stereotypical "gender roles," I think we can all agree--conservative, liberal, independent alike--are so problematic in the post-intelligence world we inhabit, that they tend to hurt people. I'd go a step further and say they cause a lot of gender dysphoria issues but I have zero proof of that, just a few surmises.
_________________
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 134 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 72 of 200
You are very likely neurodiverse (Aspie)