Fnord wrote:
Erisad wrote:
Okay, I was at an LGBT conference last month and I was talking with an open lesbian. She asked me what I identified myself as and I said, "A heterosexual Ally." She kinda snapped back at me with, "we don't need sympathy from breeders." I wasn't even sure what the term meant but I knew it was offensive and related to my being straight. I reply to her, "What? Why don't you want the support of heterosexuals? Seems kind of counterproductive doesn't it?" She muttered something and walked away. I was really confused. I talked to other Allies at the conference and they experienced similar things as well ...
This kind of behavior is what discourages me from supporting someone else's cause - at best I'm seen as a clueless intruder and treated with indifference, or at worst they see me an
agent provocateur for their opposition and they treat me with open hostility. In any case, their contempt for me as an "outsider" is obvious.
I don't blame you, Fnord. There will always be a few people who taint any organization. In the LGBT organization I am in, we don't tolerate those type of remarks. Putting someone down, for a part of who they are, is inexcusable.
Unfortunately, some LGBT members decided to be more militant and offensive in nature to protect themselves. They feel they have to be though and attack so people won't bother them. And it works. At my high school, the LGBT people organized and beat the crud out of anyone who messed with one of their "members". No one bothered them anymore.
Another example is the Stonewall riots where LGBT peoples fought against the police raids. It was only after that violence the police backed off and the US stopped persecuting them so heavily.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stonewall_riots