Jeez, some trans women can be extremely hateful to opponents

Page 4 of 5 [ 76 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,017
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

03 Feb 2015, 12:44 pm

I don't think one should really be for or against what someone does with their own body doesn't really make any sense to me and I certainly do not think it is any business of mine what someone chooses to do with their own body regardless of if I like the idea or not. Obviously hate and purposely trying to trigger people who have had traumatic experiences is certainly not a good way to handle things.


_________________
We won't go back.


Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,017
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

03 Feb 2015, 12:50 pm

MathIm wrote:
hmm. i need not to worry a lot?
transwomen's murdering at the same rate as males is uncertain.
hm. if so, i can be relieved a lot. (:


Does the blog have any evidence to back up that claim? because you cannot believe everything you read on a blog, I hope there is a link to some kind of study or something. Also even if that is the case that would still mean the majority are certainly not would be murderers.


_________________
We won't go back.


Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,017
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

03 Feb 2015, 12:56 pm

beneficii wrote:
Skibz888 wrote:
beneficii wrote:
Let's just say I'm a trans person who is reaching "peak trans."


You're a trans person reaching the peak of transphobia. Honestly, some of the comments I've seen coming from you I hear more from the likes of anti-trans bigots than I do actual trans people. Sometimes I have a few choice words of my own about the gay community and culture, but they're nowhere near to the extent of things you say time and time again on this website. At least, that's just the impression I'm continually getting from you.


Ah, yes, there's that word again: Transphobia.

What I've grown increasingly disgusted about is the actions of some in the trans community that are given a pass in the community, namely trans people who have taken no medical steps toward transition trying to get into opposite sex spaces, trying to say that somebody born with a penis was always a woman or somebody born with a vagina was always a man, the disregard for the concerns of women and girls regarding privacy, being ready to pull out the word "transphobia" whenever anyone expresses views opposing the goals of the trans community, the truly hateful tactics by trans activists verses opponents like mentioned in the OP where the trans person basically cheers on a woman having been raped, my own hateful actions toward opponents of goals the trans community has (such as funding sex reassignment), and many other things.

That is part of why I have reached trans peak.


Would you please stop trying to speak for all women and girls, I do not agree with any of your recent posts really and I have a freaking vagina and boobs alright. I do not feel my privacy is violated if transexual females who haven't had a sex change operation use the womens bathroom, I don't care to peek on people taking a piss. Also having taken psychology and sociology I am quite certain the brain and sex organs develop seperately to the extent you can in fact have someone with a female brain trapped in a males body and vice versa...thus they where born of the female 'gender' and male 'sex' or vice versa it is not hateful to say that.


_________________
We won't go back.


beneficii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,245

03 Feb 2015, 1:41 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
beneficii wrote:
Skibz888 wrote:
beneficii wrote:
Let's just say I'm a trans person who is reaching "peak trans."


You're a trans person reaching the peak of transphobia. Honestly, some of the comments I've seen coming from you I hear more from the likes of anti-trans bigots than I do actual trans people. Sometimes I have a few choice words of my own about the gay community and culture, but they're nowhere near to the extent of things you say time and time again on this website. At least, that's just the impression I'm continually getting from you.


Ah, yes, there's that word again: Transphobia.

What I've grown increasingly disgusted about is the actions of some in the trans community that are given a pass in the community, namely trans people who have taken no medical steps toward transition trying to get into opposite sex spaces, trying to say that somebody born with a penis was always a woman or somebody born with a vagina was always a man, the disregard for the concerns of women and girls regarding privacy, being ready to pull out the word "transphobia" whenever anyone expresses views opposing the goals of the trans community, the truly hateful tactics by trans activists verses opponents like mentioned in the OP where the trans person basically cheers on a woman having been raped, my own hateful actions toward opponents of goals the trans community has (such as funding sex reassignment), and many other things.

That is part of why I have reached trans peak.


Would you please stop trying to speak for all women and girls, I do not agree with any of your recent posts really and I have a freaking vagina and boobs alright. I do not feel my privacy is violated if transexual females who haven't had a sex change operation use the womens bathroom, I don't care to peek on people taking a piss. Also having taken psychology and sociology I am quite certain the brain and sex organs develop seperately to the extent you can in fact have someone with a female brain trapped in a males body and vice versa...thus they where born of the female 'gender' and male 'sex' or vice versa it is not hateful to say that.


Unfortunately, I have found many girls and women who do think it's a privacy violation. What if, in the course of using the women's bathroom, I ran into one of them?


_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin


LoveNotHate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,195
Location: USA

04 Feb 2015, 9:42 am

beneficii wrote:
She was a boy until undergoing medical transition.


If you deny the assertion that pre-transition trans people are the gender they claim, then it appears you left with labeling them as mentally ill (i.e., trans women who only partially transition are really mentally confused/disorded men)? So that they can be excluded from real women's facilities ?

Group I : non-passing / non-fully transitioned are mentally ill people, so Deny recognition
Group II: passing / fully transitioned / meets gender sterotypes are not mentally ill, so Grant recognition

So, I don't think this is workable, *unless* you are going to argue that pre-transition 'Gender Dysphoria' is a mental illness of disordered thinking.



beneficii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,245

04 Feb 2015, 10:51 am

LoveNotHate wrote:
beneficii wrote:
She was a boy until undergoing medical transition.


If you deny the assertion that pre-transition trans people are the gender they claim, then it appears you left with labeling them as mentally ill (i.e., trans women who only partially transition are really mentally confused/disorded men)? So that they can be excluded from real women's facilities ?

Group I : non-passing / non-fully transitioned are mentally ill people, so Deny recognition
Group II: passing / fully transitioned / meets gender sterotypes are not mentally ill, so Grant recognition

So, I don't think this is workable, *unless* you are going to argue that pre-transition 'Gender Dysphoria' is a mental illness of disordered thinking.


Gender dysphoria is considered a mental disorder by the psychiatric community or it would not have been listed in the DSM-5. The lack of the word "disorder" does not mean it's not a mental disorder. Take "schizophrenia" for example; it also does not have the word "disorder" in its name as listed in the DSM, but it's considered a mental disorder.

As for your post, what point are you trying to make? It is not evident to me from reading the post.


_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin


beneficii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,245

04 Feb 2015, 1:06 pm

beneficii wrote:
LoveNotHate wrote:
beneficii wrote:
She was a boy until undergoing medical transition.


If you deny the assertion that pre-transition trans people are the gender they claim, then it appears you left with labeling them as mentally ill (i.e., trans women who only partially transition are really mentally confused/disorded men)? So that they can be excluded from real women's facilities ?

Group I : non-passing / non-fully transitioned are mentally ill people, so Deny recognition
Group II: passing / fully transitioned / meets gender sterotypes are not mentally ill, so Grant recognition

So, I don't think this is workable, *unless* you are going to argue that pre-transition 'Gender Dysphoria' is a mental illness of disordered thinking.


Gender dysphoria is considered a mental disorder by the psychiatric community or it would not have been listed in the DSM-5. The lack of the word "disorder" does not mean it's not a mental disorder. Take "schizophrenia" for example; it also does not have the word "disorder" in its name as listed in the DSM, but it's considered a mental disorder.

As for your post, what point are you trying to make? It is not evident to me from reading the post.


From a comment on an article which tried to argue that since the word "disorder" would be removed from the name, treatment of gender dysphoria would no longer be medically necessary:

Quote:
A Rose by Any Other Name: Gender Identity Disorder to Be Renamed Gender Dysphoria but Retain Classification as Disorder in DSM-5

In Gender Identity disorder in prison: Depending on a diagnosis that is soon to disappear?, James Phillips succeeds in drawing attention to some of the conundrums posed by transsexualism; however, he exaggerates the significance of the proposal to change the name of the diagnosis, Gender Identity Disorder (GID) in DSM-IV, to Gender Dysphoria in DSM-5. Judge Wolf recently invoked the Eighth Amendment to require the State of Massachusetts to pay for sex reassignment surgery for a sentenced murderer. Phillips is concerned that this judgment was based on "a disputed psychiatric diagnosis that may disappear from the soon-to-appear DSM-5,"but his concern is unfounded. The name of the diagnosis is changing, but the diagnosis is not in danger of disappearing - at least not in DSM-V.

The Sex and Gender Identity Disorders workgroup of the DSM-5 considered whether or not the diagnosis should be deleted from the DSM and concluded that it should be retained because it meets the defining criteria for a psychiatric disorder that have been in place since DSM-III. The workgroup also proposed a less stigmatizing and more descriptive name for the diagnosis. While GID was open to interpretation as a disorder of gender identity, Gender Dysphoria better reflects the nature of the problem - dysphoria arising from incongruence between one's gender identity and one's physical sex characteristics. With the exception of eliminating the exclusionary criterion of physical intersex conditions, the diagnostic criteria are not substantially changed from those of DSM-IV (http://www.dsm5.org/proposedrevision/pa ... x?rid=192#). As has been the case since DSM-III not all transgender and transsexual individuals will meet criteria for the diagnosis - only those who experience clinically significant distress or impairment due to the incongruence between identity and body.

Phillips is concerned that the proposed name change implies that the diagnosis doesn't warrant designation as a "disorder." He asserts that "In their shift from GID to Gender Dysphoria, the DSM-5 authors have effectively removed its parity with major disorders like Schizophrenia." His deployment of Schizophrenia in this argument is ironic since Schizophrenia is one of the few other DSM diagnoses that also lacks the word "disorder" in its name. Whether or not "disorder" is in their names, both Gender Dysphoria and Schizophrenia will be categorized as disorders in DSM-5.

The American Psychiatric Association recently issued a position statement supporting access to medical and mental health services for persons with Gender Dysphoria in need of medically assisted gender transition http://www.psychiatry.org/practice/prof ... tyomna/.... The fact that Gender Dysphoria will be classified as a disorder in DSM-5 will continue to provide a diagnostic basis for these clinical services and facilitate access to care.

William Byne, M.D., Ph.D.
A. Evan Eyler, M.D., MPH


http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/gender- ... -disappear

The APA did a good job of pointing out that neither the gender identity nor the gender nonconformity is itself the issue, but the dysphoria, when they changed the name of the disorder. Also, they added the specifier post-transition, so that those who have completed transition can still have access to medically necessary treatments.


_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin


b9
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,003
Location: australia

04 Feb 2015, 1:14 pm

trans women can never compete with real women in the minds of people who like real women.
as much as everyone services their civic duty to be politically correct and tries to accommodate them, they will never be desired by those who are traditional.
i guess that makes them cranky.



LoveNotHate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,195
Location: USA

04 Feb 2015, 1:35 pm

beneficii wrote:

As for your post, what point are you trying to make? It is not evident to me from reading the post.


Taking a step back ...

You appear to propose that trans women are not women until they fully transition (i.e., they are their birth gender until they pass your set of qualifications)?



beneficii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,245

04 Feb 2015, 2:01 pm

LoveNotHate wrote:
beneficii wrote:

As for your post, what point are you trying to make? It is not evident to me from reading the post.


Taking a step back ...

You appear to propose that trans women are not women until they fully transition (i.e., they are their birth gender until they pass your set of qualifications)?


If they have not transitioned at all, then they should not be considered women. Beyond that, I don't really have a "set of qualifications."


_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin


Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,017
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

04 Feb 2015, 2:13 pm

beneficii wrote:

Unfortunately, I have found many girls and women who do think it's a privacy violation. What if, in the course of using the women's bathroom, I ran into one of them?


I don't know, what if...if you are identifying as a woman than you don't blurt out 'oh by the way I wasn't one before though' as that is un-needed information that you'd have every right to keep to yourself. It doesn't make sense for it to be a privacy violation was not aware hand washing was a private activity....But obviously some females would agree with you some would agree with me.


_________________
We won't go back.


Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,017
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

04 Feb 2015, 2:16 pm

beneficii wrote:
LoveNotHate wrote:
beneficii wrote:
She was a boy until undergoing medical transition.


If you deny the assertion that pre-transition trans people are the gender they claim, then it appears you left with labeling them as mentally ill (i.e., trans women who only partially transition are really mentally confused/disorded men)? So that they can be excluded from real women's facilities ?

Group I : non-passing / non-fully transitioned are mentally ill people, so Deny recognition
Group II: passing / fully transitioned / meets gender sterotypes are not mentally ill, so Grant recognition

So, I don't think this is workable, *unless* you are going to argue that pre-transition 'Gender Dysphoria' is a mental illness of disordered thinking.


Gender dysphoria is considered a mental disorder by the psychiatric community or it would not have been listed in the DSM-5. The lack of the word "disorder" does not mean it's not a mental disorder. Take "schizophrenia" for example; it also does not have the word "disorder" in its name as listed in the DSM, but it's considered a mental disorder.

As for your post, what point are you trying to make? It is not evident to me from reading the post.


It's a physiological disorder, meaning mental and physical that is why it is in the DSM there was nowhere else to really put it not everything in the DSM is a specific mental disorder. You should also look up what the treatments are...


_________________
We won't go back.


Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,017
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

04 Feb 2015, 2:18 pm

b9 wrote:
trans women can never compete with real women in the minds of people who like real women.
as much as everyone services their civic duty to be politically correct and tries to accommodate them, they will never be desired by those who are traditional.
i guess that makes them cranky.


Congratulations for the useless contribution that ads nothing to the conversation.


_________________
We won't go back.


beneficii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,245

04 Feb 2015, 10:23 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
beneficii wrote:
LoveNotHate wrote:
beneficii wrote:
She was a boy until undergoing medical transition.


If you deny the assertion that pre-transition trans people are the gender they claim, then it appears you left with labeling them as mentally ill (i.e., trans women who only partially transition are really mentally confused/disorded men)? So that they can be excluded from real women's facilities ?

Group I : non-passing / non-fully transitioned are mentally ill people, so Deny recognition
Group II: passing / fully transitioned / meets gender sterotypes are not mentally ill, so Grant recognition

So, I don't think this is workable, *unless* you are going to argue that pre-transition 'Gender Dysphoria' is a mental illness of disordered thinking.


Gender dysphoria is considered a mental disorder by the psychiatric community or it would not have been listed in the DSM-5. The lack of the word "disorder" does not mean it's not a mental disorder. Take "schizophrenia" for example; it also does not have the word "disorder" in its name as listed in the DSM, but it's considered a mental disorder.

As for your post, what point are you trying to make? It is not evident to me from reading the post.


It's a physiological disorder, meaning mental and physical that is why it is in the DSM there was nowhere else to really put it not everything in the DSM is a specific mental disorder. You should also look up what the treatments are...


Oh yes, I need to learn what the treatments of gender dysphoria are when I'm currently undergoing them. :roll:


_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin


LoveNotHate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,195
Location: USA

05 Feb 2015, 6:30 am

beneficii wrote:
LoveNotHate wrote:
beneficii wrote:

As for your post, what point are you trying to make? It is not evident to me from reading the post.


Taking a step back ...

You appear to propose that trans women are not women until they fully transition (i.e., they are their birth gender until they pass your set of qualifications)?


If they have not transitioned at all, then they should not be considered women. Beyond that, I don't really have a "set of qualifications."


At jobs I have worked, I have met non-HRT trans "women" who are recognized as women by the men and women at those jobs. This is the original point I was making.

Your assertion that these people should not be considered women goes against the reality I have experienced. The recognition is there before any medical transition.

Even before HRT I was considered "a women" because many can tell if a "guy" is not really a guy, and they can tell when the speech patterns don't match. I had one boss who asked me for my "girl name" even before I made any effort to do anything.

Also ...
-I have met a trans woman who looked like a guy but dressed as a woman, and made a effort to talk like a women, but did not appear on HRT.
-I met one trans woman who was recognized as a women with a huge beard and big belly.
-I met one trans woman with ASD and had visible discomfort communicating with others but was recognized as a woman.

I just see humans as shells for the personality.



beneficii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,245

05 Feb 2015, 12:28 pm

LoveNotHate wrote:
beneficii wrote:
LoveNotHate wrote:
beneficii wrote:

As for your post, what point are you trying to make? It is not evident to me from reading the post.


Taking a step back ...

You appear to propose that trans women are not women until they fully transition (i.e., they are their birth gender until they pass your set of qualifications)?


If they have not transitioned at all, then they should not be considered women. Beyond that, I don't really have a "set of qualifications."


At jobs I have worked, I have met non-HRT trans "women" who are recognized as women by the men and women at those jobs. This is the original point I was making.

Your assertion that these people should not be considered women goes against the reality I have experienced. The recognition is there before any medical transition.

Even before HRT I was considered "a women" because many can tell if a "guy" is not really a guy, and they can tell when the speech patterns don't match. I had one boss who asked me for my "girl name" even before I made any effort to do anything.

Also ...
-I have met a trans woman who looked like a guy but dressed as a woman, and made a effort to talk like a women, but did not appear on HRT.
-I met one trans woman who was recognized as a women with a huge beard and big belly.
-I met one trans woman with ASD and had visible discomfort communicating with others but was recognized as a woman.

I just see humans as shells for the personality.


It looks like those people have transitioned some. Those were not the people I was talking about when I said, "If they have not transitioned at all, then they should not be considered women."

You're basically just knocking down a misrepresentation of what I said.


_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin