donothing1979 wrote:
jk1 wrote:
I wasn't aware that there were negative connotations to homosexuality or autism. I'm not very up to date with what's going on in the world. Autism is new to me. Homosexuality has always been something positive for me, but I guess the majority of the world see it quite differently from the way I do. That's why I found the statement 'homosexuality is a "micro-form" of autism' rather interesting than offensive. Maybe I'm just being naive.
no, i don't think you're being naïve. I also think that homosexuality is a positive and healthy way of being... as is bisexuality, heterosexuality, and anywhere else on the sexuality spectrum. the reason this study is so harmful is that it's saying that homosexuality is a disease, something that most of the world's medical and psychological know to be false. relating homosexuality to autism is a way for this joker to justify his false claim that homosexuality is a disease, because most people know of autism as a disease. the very idea is offensive on many fronts.
...how is autism new to you?
I had always known "autism" since my childhood when we had a neighbor who had a severe case of autism. I was one of those ignorant people who thought autistic = Rain Man until late last year when I found out that autism is a spectrum disorder and that I'm myself possibly on that spectrum. That changed the whole idea of "autism" completely for me. So in that sense autism is something new that I'm still learning about since my old idea of autism was completely wrong. But is autism considered as a disease as you mentioned in your paragraph? This idea of neurodiversity goes against that negative view of autism, doesn't it?
As to homosexuality, I have always known that there are some ignorant bigoted trash people who falsely look down on homosexual people. Also those irrational religious people who cling to their delusional ideas. I really don't take notice of those people because they are really hopeless. I feel superior to those misinformed people.