madbutnotmad wrote:
Hey
just wondering, apart from sounding like a type of breakfast sandwich
I was wondering if anybody agreed with me that LGBT should instead be LGBTH
to include Heterosexuals as well. Otherwise isn't the whole LGBT thing a term that discriminates.
Why make a big distinction, why not just be all together as one, so there isn't a divide?
I feel sometimes its a bit like people who fight for race equality but then make a big deal about
belonging to a black and proud club that only allows people with black skin belong to, or a Mexican only club, or a white supremacy club.
Sorry if anyone finds offense here.
I personally see the world as made up people not groups of nationals. I am sorry if that offends anyone.
Don't you think the idea of having the label is to collectively refer to a specific class of people, i. e. sexual minorities? LGBTH would just mean something like sexuality and not point out a specific class of sexuality. And besides, look at all the literature that would have to be updated. But I do like the cooperative spirit of your idea.